Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DKS vs PRPL vs BBY vs AMZN vs WMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
DKS vs PRPL vs BBY vs AMZN vs WMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $20.54B | $55M | $12.47B | $2.93T | $1.04T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17.22B | $505M | $41.69B | $742.78B | $703.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $849M | $-35M | $1.07B | $90.80B | $22.91B |
| Gross Margin | 32.9% | 40.9% | 22.5% | 50.6% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | 7.7% | -6.1% | 3.3% | 11.5% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 15.8x | — | 9.2x | 31.4x | 44.8x |
| Total Debt | $4.49B | $204M | $4.13B | $152.99B | $67.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.69B | $24M | $1.74B | $86.81B | $10.73B |
DKS vs PRPL vs BBY vs AMZN vs WMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| DICK'S Sporting Goo… (DKS) | 100 | 626.2 | +526.2% |
| Purple Innovation, … (PRPL) | 100 | 3.5 | -96.5% |
| Best Buy Co., Inc. (BBY) | 100 | 76.1 | -23.9% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 223.3 | +123.3% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 315.3 | +215.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DKS vs PRPL vs BBY vs AMZN vs WMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DKS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.46, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 1530.03x
- 28.1% revenue growth vs PRPL's -3.9%
Among these 5 stocks, PRPL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
BBY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 1.08, yield 6.4%
- Beta 1.08, yield 6.4%, current ratio 1.11x
- Lower P/E (9.2x vs 44.8x)
- 6.4% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
AMZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth 29.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.7%
- PEG 1.12 vs WMT's 4.07
- 12.2% margin vs PRPL's -7.0%
- +42.0% vs PRPL's -38.1%
WMT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 5.0% 10Y total return vs AMZN's 7.0%
- Beta 0.11 vs AMZN's 1.50
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.1% revenue growth vs PRPL's -3.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.2x vs 44.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs PRPL's -7.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.11 vs AMZN's 1.50 | |
| Dividends | 6.4% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.0% vs PRPL's -38.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs PRPL's -12.1%, ROIC 14.7% vs -15.8% |
DKS vs PRPL vs BBY vs AMZN vs WMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DKS vs PRPL vs BBY vs AMZN vs WMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMZN leads in 1 of 6 categories
BBY leads 1 • DKS leads 0 • PRPL leads 0 • WMT leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 1470.1x PRPL's $505M. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRPL's -7.0%. On growth, DKS holds the edge at +59.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $17.2B | $505M | $41.7B | $742.8B | $703.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.4B | -$12M | $1.9B | $155.9B | $42.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $849M | -$35M | $1.1B | $90.8B | $22.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $399.7B | -$15M | $1.3B | -$2.5B | $15.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.9% | +40.9% | +22.5% | +50.6% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | -6.1% | +3.3% | +11.5% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.9% | -7.0% | +2.6% | +12.2% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.2% | -3.0% | +3.0% | -0.3% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +59.9% | +35.1% | -1.0% | +16.6% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -61.0% | -55.6% | +3.7% | +74.8% | +35.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — DKS and PRPL and BBY each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.8x trailing earnings, BBY trades at a 75% valuation discount to WMT's 47.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMZN offers better value at 1.36x vs WMT's 4.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20.5B | $55M | $12.5B | $2.93T | $1.04T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $23.3B | $234M | $14.9B | $3.00T | $1.10T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.65x | -1.04x | 11.79x | 38.03x | 47.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.81x | — | 9.16x | 31.41x | 44.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.93x | — | — | 1.36x | 4.34x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.84x | — | 6.70x | 20.58x | 24.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.19x | 0.12x | 0.30x | 4.09x | 1.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | — | 3.61x | 7.18x | 10.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.05x | — | 9.92x | 381.09x | 25.00x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BBY leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BBY delivers a 36.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $0 for DKS. DKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BBY's 1.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BBY scores 7/9 vs PRPL's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.1% | — | +36.8% | +23.3% | +22.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.1% | -12.1% | +7.0% | +11.5% | +7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.0% | -15.8% | +18.7% | +14.7% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.0% | -15.8% | +20.2% | +15.3% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | — | 1.18x | 0.37x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.8B | $180M | $2.4B | $66.2B | $56.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.7B | $24M | $1.7B | $86.8B | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.5B | $204M | $4.1B | $153.0B | $67.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 19.04x | -0.32x | 19.90x | 39.96x | 11.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — AMZN and WMT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,660 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $175 for PRPL. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +42.0% total return vs PRPL's -38.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.7% vs PRPL's -44.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.4% | -30.4% | -12.7% | +20.4% | +16.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.6% | -38.1% | -8.9% | +42.0% | +35.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.7% | -83.2% | -2.5% | +157.7% | +161.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +179.8% | -98.2% | -38.6% | +70.9% | +186.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +457.8% | -94.9% | +163.7% | +702.2% | +501.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.3% | -44.9% | -0.8% | +37.1% | +37.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMZN and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs PRPL's 39.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.46x | 1.18x | 1.08x | 1.50x | 0.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $237.31 | $1.26 | $84.99 | $278.56 | $134.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $167.03 | $0.47 | $56.68 | $188.82 | $91.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.2% | +39.8% | +69.9% | +97.9% | +96.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.7 | 36.6 | 39.8 | 74.2 | 56.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 322K | 4.2M | 45.2M | 17.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BBY and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DKS as "Buy", BBY as "Hold", AMZN as "Buy", WMT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.4% upside for BBY (target: $75) vs 5.2% for WMT (target: $137). For income investors, BBY offers the higher dividend yield at 6.36% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $251.43 | — | $74.50 | $306.77 | $137.22 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 63 | — | 41 | 94 | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | — | +6.4% | — | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 0 | 8 | — | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.86 | — | $3.78 | — | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | 0.0% | +2.2% | 0.0% | +0.8% |
AMZN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). BBY leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 4 tied.
DKS vs PRPL vs BBY vs AMZN vs WMT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DKS or PRPL or BBY or AMZN or WMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.
(DKS) is the stronger pick with 28. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 9% for Purple Innovation, Inc. (PRPL). Best Buy Co. , Inc. (BBY) offers the better valuation at 11. 8x trailing P/E (9. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. (DKS) a "Buy" — based on 63 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DKS or PRPL or BBY or AMZN or WMT?
On trailing P/E, Best Buy Co.
, Inc. (BBY) is the cheapest at 11. 8x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 8x. On forward P/E, Best Buy Co. , Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Amazon. com, Inc. wins at 1. 12x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 07x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DKS or PRPL or BBY or AMZN or WMT?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +186. 6%, compared to -98. 2% for Purple Innovation, Inc. (PRPL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +702. 2% versus PRPL's -94. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DKS or PRPL or BBY or AMZN or WMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 11β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 50β — meaning AMZN is approximately 1301% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. (DKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 118% for Best Buy Co. , Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DKS or PRPL or BBY or AMZN or WMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.
(DKS) is pulling ahead at 28. 1% versus -3. 9% for Purple Innovation, Inc. (PRPL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Purple Innovation, Inc. grew EPS 47. 3% year-over-year, compared to -29. 0% for DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMZN leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DKS or PRPL or BBY or AMZN or WMT?
DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.
(DKS) is the more profitable company, earning 49. 3% net margin versus -11. 0% for Purple Innovation, Inc. — meaning it keeps 49. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMZN leads at 11. 2% versus -6. 8% for PRPL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMZN leads at 50. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DKS or PRPL or BBY or AMZN or WMT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 12x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 07x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Best Buy Co. , Inc. (BBY) trades at 9. 2x forward P/E versus 44. 8x for Walmart Inc. — 35. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BBY: 25. 4% to $74. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — DKS or PRPL or BBY or AMZN or WMT?
In this comparison, BBY (6.
4% yield), DKS (2. 2% yield), WMT (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. PRPL, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DKS or PRPL or BBY or AMZN or WMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 11), 0. 7% yield, +501. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +501. 4%, PRPL: -94. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DKS and PRPL and BBY and AMZN and WMT?
These companies operate in different sectors (DKS (Consumer Cyclical) and PRPL (Consumer Cyclical) and BBY (Consumer Cyclical) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and WMT (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DKS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PRPL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BBY is a mid-cap deep-value stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. DKS, BBY, WMT pay a dividend while PRPL, AMZN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.