Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
DKS vs RGS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Personal Products & Services
DKS vs RGS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Personal Products & Services |
| Market Cap | $20.22B | $68M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17.22B | $233M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $849M | $114M |
| Gross Margin | 32.9% | 47.6% |
| Operating Margin | 7.7% | 10.5% |
| Forward P/E | 15.6x | 0.6x |
| Total Debt | $4.49B | $351M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.69B | $35M |
DKS vs RGS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| DICK'S Sporting Goo… (DKS) | 100 | 616.4 | +516.4% |
| Regis Corporation (RGS) | 100 | 13.3 | -86.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DKS vs RGS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DKS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 1.45, yield 2.2%
- Rev growth 28.1%, EPS growth -29.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.7%
- 450.0% 10Y total return vs RGS's -89.7%
RGS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.
- Beta 0.79, current ratio 0.50x
- Lower P/E (0.6x vs 15.6x)
- 48.9% margin vs DKS's 4.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.1% revenue growth vs RGS's 3.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.6x vs 15.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 48.9% margin vs DKS's 4.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.79 vs DKS's 1.45 | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield; 11-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +49.9% vs DKS's +20.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.4% ROA vs DKS's 6.1%, ROIC 3.2% vs 0.0% |
DKS vs RGS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DKS vs RGS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — DKS and RGS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DKS is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.2B annually — 73.7x RGS's $233M. RGS is the more profitable business, keeping 48.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DKS's 4.9%. On growth, DKS holds the edge at +59.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $17.2B | $233M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.4B | $29M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $849M | $114M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $399.7B | $15M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.9% | +47.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | +10.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.9% | +48.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.2% | +6.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +59.9% | +22.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -61.0% | -94.1% |
Valuation Metrics
DKS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.6x trailing earnings, RGS trades at a 97% valuation discount to DKS's 22.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DKS's 12.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RGS's 16.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20.2B | $68M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $23.0B | $384M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.29x | 0.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.56x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.90x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.66x | 16.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.17x | 0.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 0.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.05x | 5.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RGS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RGS delivers a 60.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $60 in annual profit, vs $0 for DKS. DKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RGS's 1.89x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RGS scores 6/9 vs DKS's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.1% | +60.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.1% | +19.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.0% | +3.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.0% | +3.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 1.89x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.8B | $316M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.7B | $35M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.5B | $351M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 19.04x | 1.31x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DKS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DKS five years ago would be worth $27,378 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,447 for RGS. Over the past 12 months, RGS leads with a +49.9% total return vs DKS's +20.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DKS at 18.7% vs RGS's 10.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.6% | +4.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.6% | +49.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.2% | +35.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.8% | -85.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +450.0% | -89.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.7% | +10.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DKS and RGS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RGS is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DKS's 1.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DKS currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs RGS's 88.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.45x | 0.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $237.31 | $31.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $167.03 | $17.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.7% | +88.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.0 | 56.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 9K |
Analyst Outlook
DKS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
DKS is the only dividend payer here at 2.19% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $251.43 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 63 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.86 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | 0.0% |
DKS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). RGS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
DKS vs RGS: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DKS or RGS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.
(DKS) is the stronger pick with 28. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 5% for Regis Corporation (RGS). Regis Corporation (RGS) offers the better valuation at 0. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. (DKS) a "Buy" — based on 63 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DKS or RGS?
On trailing P/E, Regis Corporation (RGS) is the cheapest at 0.
6x versus DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. at 22. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DKS or RGS?
Over the past 5 years, DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.
(DKS) delivered a total return of +173. 8%, compared to -85. 5% for Regis Corporation (RGS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DKS returned +450. 0% versus RGS's -89. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DKS or RGS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Regis Corporation (RGS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
79β versus DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. 's 1. 45β — meaning DKS is approximately 85% more volatile than RGS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. (DKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 189% for Regis Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DKS or RGS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.
(DKS) is pulling ahead at 28. 1% versus 3. 5% for Regis Corporation (RGS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Regis Corporation grew EPS 13. 9% year-over-year, compared to -29. 0% for DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DKS leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DKS or RGS?
DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.
(DKS) is the more profitable company, earning 49. 3% net margin versus 58. 8% for Regis Corporation — meaning it keeps 49. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RGS leads at 9. 5% versus 7. 7% for DKS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RGS leads at 38. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — DKS or RGS?
In this comparison, DKS (2.
2% yield) pays a dividend. RGS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is DKS or RGS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.
(DKS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2. 2% yield, +450. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DKS: +450. 0%, RGS: -89. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between DKS and RGS?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DKS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RGS is a small-cap deep-value stock. DKS pays a dividend while RGS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.