Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
DOCS vs NVCR vs INVA vs HIMS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Biotechnology
Medical - Equipment & Services
DOCS vs NVCR vs INVA vs HIMS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Biotechnology | Medical - Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $5.23B | $2.04B | $1.69B | $7.30B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $638M | $674M | $424M | $2.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $239M | $-173M | $504M | $128M |
| Gross Margin | 89.7% | 75.2% | 76.2% | 69.7% |
| Operating Margin | 37.4% | -27.2% | 14.8% | 4.6% |
| Forward P/E | 16.8x | — | 7.3x | 58.3x |
| Total Debt | $12M | $290M | $269M | $1.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $210M | $103M | $551M | $229M |
DOCS vs NVCR vs INVA vs HIMS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) | 100 | 44.6 | -55.4% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 8.1 | -91.9% |
| Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) | 100 | 170.7 | +70.7% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 259.6 | +159.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DOCS vs NVCR vs INVA vs HIMS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DOCS is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.21 vs INVA's 0.71
NVCR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
INVA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.11
- Lower volatility, beta 0.11, Low D/E 22.9%, current ratio 14.64x
- Beta 0.11, current ratio 14.64x
- Lower P/E (7.3x vs 58.3x)
HIMS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
- 188.5% 10Y total return vs INVA's 95.6%
- 59.0% revenue growth vs NVCR's 8.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.0% revenue growth vs NVCR's 8.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.3x vs 58.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 118.9% margin vs NVCR's -25.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.11 vs HIMS's 2.48, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +23.2% vs DOCS's -56.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 32.4% ROA vs NVCR's -16.5%, ROIC 14.2% vs -16.4% |
DOCS vs NVCR vs INVA vs HIMS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
DOCS vs NVCR vs INVA vs HIMS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DOCS leads in 2 of 6 categories
INVA leads 2 • HIMS leads 1 • NVCR leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DOCS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HIMS is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.3B annually — 5.5x INVA's $424M. INVA is the more profitable business, keeping 118.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NVCR's -25.7%. On growth, HIMS holds the edge at +28.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $638M | $674M | $424M | $2.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $250M | -$165M | $86M | $164M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $239M | -$173M | $504M | $128M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $314M | -$48M | $181M | $73M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +89.7% | +75.2% | +76.2% | +69.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.4% | -27.2% | +14.8% | +4.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +37.5% | -25.7% | +118.9% | +5.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +49.2% | -7.1% | +42.6% | +3.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.8% | +12.3% | +10.6% | +28.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.2% | -100.0% | +4.0% | -27.3% |
Valuation Metrics
INVA leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.9x trailing earnings, INVA trades at a 87% valuation discount to HIMS's 55.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DOCS offers better value at 0.29x vs INVA's 0.67x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.2B | $2.0B | $1.7B | $7.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.0B | $2.2B | $1.4B | $8.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.41x | -14.66x | 6.94x | 55.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.80x | — | 7.31x | 58.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.29x | — | 0.67x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.09x | — | 6.90x | 46.50x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.16x | 3.11x | 3.97x | 3.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.83x | 5.86x | 1.65x | 13.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.60x | — | 8.63x | 98.70x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DOCS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INVA delivers a 47.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $-51 for NVCR. DOCS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DOCS scores 9/9 vs HIMS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +24.4% | -50.8% | +47.6% | +23.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +20.7% | -16.5% | +32.4% | +6.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +20.0% | -16.4% | +14.2% | +10.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +22.3% | -28.9% | +12.4% | +10.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.85x | 0.23x | 2.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$197M | $187M | -$282M | $892M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $210M | $103M | $551M | $229M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12M | $290M | $269M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -96.80x | 63.45x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HIMS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HIMS five years ago would be worth $27,393 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $983 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, INVA leads with a +23.2% total return vs DOCS's -56.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HIMS at 33.6% vs NVCR's -36.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -40.0% | +36.4% | +15.2% | -15.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -56.2% | +2.6% | +23.2% | -45.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.3% | -74.2% | +96.0% | +138.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.0% | -90.2% | +94.5% | +173.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.0% | +38.5% | +95.6% | +188.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.9% | -36.4% | +25.1% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
INVA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INVA is the less volatile stock with a 0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INVA currently trades 91.0% from its 52-week high vs DOCS's 34.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.99x | 2.15x | 0.11x | 2.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $76.51 | $20.06 | $25.15 | $70.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.55 | $9.82 | $16.52 | $13.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +34.0% | +89.2% | +91.0% | +40.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.2 | 70.9 | 44.7 | 50.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.7M | 1.4M | 604K | 34.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DOCS as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", INVA as "Buy", HIMS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 87.3% upside for NVCR (target: $34) vs -7.3% for HIMS (target: $26).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $42.79 | $33.50 | $40.00 | $26.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 15 | 10 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.3% | 0.0% | +0.3% | +1.2% |
DOCS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). INVA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
DOCS vs NVCR vs INVA vs HIMS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DOCS or NVCR or INVA or HIMS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) offers the better valuation at 6. 9x trailing P/E (7. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DOCS or NVCR or INVA or HIMS?
On trailing P/E, Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the cheapest at 6. 9x versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. at 55. 4x. On forward P/E, Innoviva, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Doximity, Inc. wins at 0. 21x versus Innoviva, Inc. 's 0. 71x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DOCS or NVCR or INVA or HIMS?
Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) delivered a total return of +173. 9%, compared to -90. 2% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HIMS returned +188. 5% versus DOCS's -51. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DOCS or NVCR or INVA or HIMS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 11β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 48β — meaning HIMS is approximately 2078% more volatile than INVA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DOCS or NVCR or INVA or HIMS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus 8. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Innoviva, Inc. grew EPS 816. 7% year-over-year, compared to -3. 8% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DOCS or NVCR or INVA or HIMS?
Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the more profitable company, earning 63. 8% net margin versus -20. 8% for NovoCure Limited — meaning it keeps 63. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DOCS leads at 39. 9% versus -23. 5% for NVCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DOCS leads at 90. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DOCS or NVCR or INVA or HIMS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 21x versus Innoviva, Inc. 's 0. 71x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) trades at 7. 3x forward P/E versus 58. 3x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 51. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVCR: 87. 3% to $33. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — DOCS or NVCR or INVA or HIMS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is DOCS or NVCR or INVA or HIMS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 11)). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (INVA: +95. 6%, NVCR: +38. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DOCS and NVCR and INVA and HIMS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DOCS is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; INVA is a small-cap high-growth stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.