Restaurants
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
DPZ vs JACK vs YUM vs WEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
Restaurants
Restaurants
DPZ vs JACK vs YUM vs WEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $11.18B | $266M | $43.48B | $1.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.98B | $1.35B | $8.48B | $2.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $592M | $-69M | $1.74B | $186M |
| Gross Margin | 40.1% | 27.6% | 45.7% | 35.6% |
| Operating Margin | 19.6% | -2.8% | 31.5% | 16.8% |
| Forward P/E | 16.8x | 4.0x | 22.5x | 12.7x |
| Total Debt | $5.23B | $3.12B | $11.91B | $4.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $434M | $52M | $709M | $451M |
DPZ vs JACK vs YUM vs WEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domino's Pizza, Inc. (DPZ) | 100 | 83.8 | -16.2% |
| Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK) | 100 | 20.6 | -79.4% |
| Yum! Brands, Inc. (YUM) | 100 | 169.3 | +69.3% |
| The Wendy's Company (WEN) | 100 | 34.3 | -65.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DPZ vs JACK vs YUM vs WEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DPZ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.32, yield 2.1%
- 205.7% 10Y total return vs YUM's 200.9%
- 33.3% ROA vs JACK's -2.7%, ROIC 73.5% vs -0.6%
JACK is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (4.0x vs 22.5x)
YUM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 8.8%, EPS growth 6.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.19, current ratio 1.35x
- 8.8% revenue growth vs JACK's -6.7%
- 20.5% margin vs JACK's -5.2%
WEN is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and defensive.
- PEG 1.23 vs DPZ's 2.32
- Beta 0.52, yield 14.3%, current ratio 1.85x
- 14.3% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs DPZ's 2.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.8% revenue growth vs JACK's -6.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.0x vs 22.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.5% margin vs JACK's -5.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.19 vs JACK's 1.69 | |
| Dividends | 14.3% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs DPZ's 2.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.1% vs JACK's -47.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 33.3% ROA vs JACK's -2.7%, ROIC 73.5% vs -0.6% |
DPZ vs JACK vs YUM vs WEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DPZ vs JACK vs YUM vs WEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
YUM leads in 3 of 6 categories
JACK leads 1 • DPZ leads 1 • WEN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
YUM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
YUM is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.5B annually — 6.3x JACK's $1.3B. YUM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JACK's -5.2%. On growth, YUM holds the edge at +15.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.0B | $1.3B | $8.5B | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $999M | $16M | $2.8B | $530M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $592M | -$69M | $1.7B | $186M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $654M | -$10M | $1.6B | $238M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.1% | +27.6% | +45.7% | +35.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.6% | -2.8% | +31.5% | +16.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | -5.2% | +20.5% | +8.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.1% | -0.7% | +19.4% | +10.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.5% | -25.5% | +15.2% | -3.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.6% | +33.7% | +72.2% | -8.0% |
Valuation Metrics
JACK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.3x trailing earnings, WEN trades at a 74% valuation discount to YUM's 28.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WEN offers better value at 0.71x vs DPZ's 2.62x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11.2B | $266M | $43.5B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16.0B | $3.3B | $54.7B | $5.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.93x | -3.29x | 28.29x | 7.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.79x | 4.02x | 22.46x | 12.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.62x | — | 2.08x | 0.71x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.25x | 82.92x | 19.98x | 9.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.26x | 0.18x | 5.29x | 0.59x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | — | 5.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.65x | 3.58x | 26.53x | 5.07x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DPZ leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DPZ scores 8/9 vs JACK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | — | — | +170.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +33.3% | -2.7% | +22.8% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +73.5% | -0.6% | +48.1% | +7.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +137.8% | -0.8% | +41.7% | +7.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | — | 15.78x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.8B | $3.1B | $11.2B | $3.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $434M | $52M | $709M | $451M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.2B | $3.1B | $11.9B | $4.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.62x | -0.51x | 5.26x | 2.86x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
YUM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in YUM five years ago would be worth $14,002 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,723 for JACK. Over the past 12 months, YUM leads with a +7.1% total return vs JACK's -47.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors YUM at 6.6% vs JACK's -42.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -21.3% | -25.9% | +5.0% | -13.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -28.7% | -47.8% | +7.1% | -36.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.7% | -81.2% | +21.1% | -58.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.9% | -82.8% | +40.0% | -53.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +205.7% | -59.5% | +200.9% | +10.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.4% | -42.7% | +6.6% | -25.3% |
Risk & Volatility
YUM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
YUM is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JACK's 1.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. YUM currently trades 92.9% from its 52-week high vs JACK's 47.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.29x | 1.71x | 0.19x | 0.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $499.08 | $29.40 | $169.39 | $12.52 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $322.17 | $8.91 | $137.33 | $6.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.6% | +47.2% | +92.9% | +55.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 30.9 | 58.4 | 44.9 | 42.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 962K | 837K | 1.6M | 7.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — DPZ and WEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DPZ as "Buy", JACK as "Hold", YUM as "Hold", WEN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 43.6% upside for JACK (target: $20) vs 11.2% for WEN (target: $8). For income investors, WEN offers the higher dividend yield at 14.31% vs YUM's 1.80%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $427.06 | $19.92 | $175.91 | $7.73 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 52 | 41 | 51 | 51 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +6.3% | +1.8% | +14.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 0 | 8 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $6.92 | $0.87 | $2.84 | $0.99 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.2% | +1.9% | +1.3% | +5.8% |
YUM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). JACK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
DPZ vs JACK vs YUM vs WEN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DPZ or JACK or YUM or WEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Yum!
Brands, Inc. (YUM) is the stronger pick with 8. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 7% for Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK). The Wendy's Company (WEN) offers the better valuation at 7. 3x trailing P/E (12. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Domino's Pizza, Inc. (DPZ) a "Buy" — based on 52 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DPZ or JACK or YUM or WEN?
On trailing P/E, The Wendy's Company (WEN) is the cheapest at 7.
3x versus Yum! Brands, Inc. at 28. 3x. On forward P/E, Jack in the Box Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Wendy's Company wins at 1. 23x versus Domino's Pizza, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DPZ or JACK or YUM or WEN?
Over the past 5 years, Yum!
Brands, Inc. (YUM) delivered a total return of +40. 0%, compared to -82. 8% for Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DPZ returned +198. 2% versus JACK's -59. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DPZ or JACK or YUM or WEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Yum!
Brands, Inc. (YUM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 19β versus Jack in the Box Inc. 's 1. 71β — meaning JACK is approximately 810% more volatile than YUM relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — DPZ or JACK or YUM or WEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Yum!
Brands, Inc. (YUM) is pulling ahead at 8. 8% versus -6. 7% for Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Yum! Brands, Inc. grew EPS 6. 5% year-over-year, compared to -127. 6% for Jack in the Box Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, YUM leads at 6. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DPZ or JACK or YUM or WEN?
Yum!
Brands, Inc. (YUM) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 0% net margin versus -5. 5% for Jack in the Box Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: YUM leads at 30. 8% versus -1. 2% for JACK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — YUM leads at 46. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DPZ or JACK or YUM or WEN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Wendy's Company (WEN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 23x versus Domino's Pizza, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK) trades at 4. 0x forward P/E versus 22. 5x for Yum! Brands, Inc. — 18. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JACK: 43. 6% to $19. 92.
08Which pays a better dividend — DPZ or JACK or YUM or WEN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
The Wendy's Company (WEN) offers the highest yield at 14. 3%, versus 1. 8% for Yum! Brands, Inc. (YUM).
09Is DPZ or JACK or YUM or WEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Yum!
Brands, Inc. (YUM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 19), 1. 8% yield, +191. 8% 10Y return). Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK) carries a higher beta of 1. 71 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (YUM: +191. 8%, JACK: -59. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DPZ and JACK and YUM and WEN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DPZ is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; JACK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; YUM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; WEN is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.