Regulated Electric
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DTB vs GEV vs SO vs NEE vs PWR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Renewable Utilities
Regulated Electric
Regulated Electric
Engineering & Construction
DTB vs GEV vs SO vs NEE vs PWR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Electric | Renewable Utilities | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $3.55B | $281.02B | $104.20B | $194.60B | $112.65B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15.28B | $39.38B | $30.17B | $27.93B | $29.99B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.46B | $9.38B | $4.36B | $8.18B | $1.12B |
| Gross Margin | 16.9% | 19.9% | 43.1% | 47.8% | 13.6% |
| Operating Margin | 13.4% | 3.9% | 24.1% | 29.5% | 5.8% |
| Forward P/E | 2.2x | 37.6x | 20.2x | 23.1x | 57.4x |
| Total Debt | $26.52B | $0.00 | $65.82B | $95.62B | $1.19B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $250M | $8.85B | $1.64B | $2.81B | $440M |
DTB vs GEV vs SO vs NEE vs PWR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| DTE Energy Company … (DTB) | 100 | 82.9 | -17.1% |
| GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) | 100 | 764.7 | +664.7% |
| The Southern Company (SO) | 100 | 128.8 | +28.8% |
| NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) | 100 | 146.0 | +46.0% |
| Quanta Services, In… (PWR) | 100 | 289.0 | +189.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DTB vs GEV vs SO vs NEE vs PWR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DTB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.
- Beta 0.72, yield 24.6%, current ratio 0.80x
- 22.7% revenue growth vs GEV's 8.9%
- Lower P/E (2.2x vs 20.2x)
- 24.6% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs NEE's 2.4%
GEV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum and efficiency is your priority.
- +157.4% vs DTB's +3.5%
- 15.2% ROA vs SO's 2.8%, ROIC 27.9% vs 5.3%
SO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NEE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 30 yrs, beta 0.21, yield 2.4%
- PEG 1.33 vs SO's 3.45
- 29.3% margin vs PWR's 3.7%
- Beta 0.21 vs GEV's 1.76
PWR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 19.8%, EPS growth 12.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.4%
- 31.4% 10Y total return vs GEV's 7.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.30, Low D/E 13.2%, current ratio 1.14x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.7% revenue growth vs GEV's 8.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.2x vs 20.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.3% margin vs PWR's 3.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs GEV's 1.76 | |
| Dividends | 24.6% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs NEE's 2.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +157.4% vs DTB's +3.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.2% ROA vs SO's 2.8%, ROIC 27.9% vs 5.3% |
DTB vs GEV vs SO vs NEE vs PWR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DTB vs GEV vs SO vs NEE vs PWR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GEV leads in 2 of 6 categories
NEE leads 1 • DTB leads 1 • SO leads 0 • PWR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NEE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GEV is the larger business by revenue, generating $39.4B annually — 2.6x DTB's $15.3B. NEE is the more profitable business, keeping 29.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PWR's 3.7%. On growth, PWR holds the edge at +26.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $15.3B | $39.4B | $30.2B | $27.9B | $30.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.0B | $2.2B | $13.3B | $15.5B | $2.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.5B | $9.4B | $4.4B | $8.2B | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1.0B | $3.6B | -$3.8B | -$3.8B | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.9% | +19.9% | +43.1% | +47.8% | +13.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | +3.9% | +24.1% | +29.5% | +5.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.6% | +23.8% | +14.5% | +29.3% | +3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.6% | +9.2% | -12.7% | -13.6% | +5.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.4% | +16.1% | +8.0% | +7.3% | +26.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.0% | +18.2% | -0.8% | +160.0% | +51.0% |
Valuation Metrics
DTB leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.4x trailing earnings, DTB trades at a 98% valuation discount to PWR's 110.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NEE offers better value at 1.64x vs PWR's 6.40x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.5B | $281.0B | $104.2B | $194.6B | $112.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $29.8B | $272.2B | $168.4B | $287.4B | $113.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2.42x | 59.12x | 23.58x | 28.36x | 110.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 2.21x | 37.62x | 20.21x | 23.07x | 57.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 4.03x | 1.64x | 6.40x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.53x | 121.45x | 12.66x | 18.73x | 45.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.23x | 7.38x | 3.53x | 7.08x | 3.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.29x | 23.47x | 2.64x | 2.93x | 12.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 75.73x | — | — | 69.50x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GEV leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GEV delivers a 79.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $80 in annual profit, vs $11 for SO. PWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DTB's 2.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DTB scores 6/9 vs PWR's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.2% | +79.7% | +11.3% | +12.7% | +13.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.8% | +15.2% | +2.8% | +3.9% | +4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.2% | +27.9% | +5.3% | +4.1% | +11.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.4% | +6.6% | +5.4% | +4.7% | +11.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.16x | — | 1.69x | 1.44x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $26.3B | -$8.8B | $64.2B | $92.8B | $748M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $250M | $8.8B | $1.6B | $2.8B | $440M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $26.5B | $0 | $65.8B | $95.6B | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.94x | — | 2.51x | 1.99x | 6.27x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GEV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GEV five years ago would be worth $79,830 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,900 for DTB. Over the past 12 months, GEV leads with a +157.4% total return vs DTB's +3.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GEV at 99.9% vs DTB's 0.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.4% | +54.0% | +6.9% | +16.1% | +70.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.5% | +157.4% | +3.6% | +42.0% | +132.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.4% | +698.3% | +35.5% | +31.0% | +345.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.0% | +698.3% | +60.6% | +38.2% | +651.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.7% | +698.3% | +137.8% | +266.0% | +3143.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.4% | +99.9% | +10.7% | +9.4% | +64.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SO and PWR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SO is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GEV's 1.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PWR currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs GEV's 88.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.72x | 1.76x | -0.15x | 0.21x | 1.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.18 | $1181.95 | $100.84 | $98.75 | $788.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.29 | $387.03 | $83.09 | $63.88 | $315.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.0% | +88.5% | +91.7% | +94.5% | +95.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.9 | 66.5 | 43.5 | 54.3 | 87.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 17K | 2.4M | 4.5M | 8.7M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — DTB and NEE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GEV as "Buy", SO as "Hold", NEE as "Buy", PWR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.8% upside for SO (target: $100) vs -13.8% for PWR (target: $647). For income investors, DTB offers the higher dividend yield at 24.65% vs NEE's 2.40%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $1119.95 | $99.62 | $98.13 | $647.23 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 28 | 33 | 36 | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +24.6% | +0.1% | +2.9% | +2.4% | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 1 | 1 | 30 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.21 | $1.00 | $2.72 | $2.24 | $0.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% |
GEV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). NEE leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
DTB vs GEV vs SO vs NEE vs PWR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DTB or GEV or SO or NEE or PWR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DTE Energy Company 2020 Series (DTB) is the stronger pick with 22.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 9% for GE Vernova Inc. (GEV). DTE Energy Company 2020 Series (DTB) offers the better valuation at 2. 4x trailing P/E (2. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DTB or GEV or SO or NEE or PWR?
On trailing P/E, DTE Energy Company 2020 Series (DTB) is the cheapest at 2.
4x versus Quanta Services, Inc. at 110. 4x. On forward P/E, DTE Energy Company 2020 Series is actually cheaper at 2. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NextEra Energy, Inc. wins at 1. 33x versus The Southern Company's 3. 45x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DTB or GEV or SO or NEE or PWR?
Over the past 5 years, GE Vernova Inc.
(GEV) delivered a total return of +698. 3%, compared to -11. 0% for DTE Energy Company 2020 Series (DTB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PWR returned +31. 4% versus DTB's -9. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DTB or GEV or SO or NEE or PWR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Southern Company (SO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
15β versus GE Vernova Inc. 's 1. 76β — meaning GEV is approximately -1258% more volatile than SO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 2% for DTE Energy Company 2020 Series — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DTB or GEV or SO or NEE or PWR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DTE Energy Company 2020 Series (DTB) is pulling ahead at 22.
7% versus 8. 9% for GE Vernova Inc. (GEV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GE Vernova Inc. grew EPS 217. 0% year-over-year, compared to -2. 4% for NextEra Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PWR leads at 18. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DTB or GEV or SO or NEE or PWR?
NextEra Energy, Inc.
(NEE) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 9% net margin versus 3. 6% for Quanta Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NEE leads at 30. 1% versus 3. 6% for GEV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NEE leads at 62. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DTB or GEV or SO or NEE or PWR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 33x versus The Southern Company's 3. 45x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, DTE Energy Company 2020 Series (DTB) trades at 2. 2x forward P/E versus 57. 4x for Quanta Services, Inc. — 55. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SO: 7. 8% to $99. 62.
08Which pays a better dividend — DTB or GEV or SO or NEE or PWR?
In this comparison, DTB (24.
6% yield), SO (2. 9% yield), NEE (2. 4% yield) pay a dividend. GEV, PWR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DTB or GEV or SO or NEE or PWR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Southern Company (SO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
15), 2. 9% yield, +137. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SO: +137. 8%, PWR: +31. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DTB and GEV and SO and NEE and PWR?
These companies operate in different sectors (DTB (Utilities) and GEV (Utilities) and SO (Utilities) and NEE (Utilities) and PWR (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DTB is a small-cap high-growth stock; GEV is a large-cap quality compounder stock; SO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NEE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock. DTB, SO, NEE pay a dividend while GEV, PWR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.