Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DTI vs KLXE vs NESR vs DNOW vs BKR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
DTI vs KLXE vs NESR vs DNOW vs BKR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $118M | $58M | $2.24B | $1.54B | $63.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $155M | $637M | $1.27B | $3.40B | $27.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $-77M | $70M | $-141M | $3.12B |
| Gross Margin | 66.7% | 21.2% | 13.9% | 15.6% | 23.6% |
| Operating Margin | 6.6% | 10.2% | 8.8% | -2.5% | 25.3% |
| Forward P/E | 18.1x | — | 15.3x | 20.7x | 26.5x |
| Total Debt | $57M | $318M | $409M | $669M | $7.14B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $6M | $108M | $164M | $3.71B |
DTI vs KLXE vs NESR vs DNOW vs BKR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drilling Tools Inte… (DTI) | 100 | 33.9 | -66.1% |
| KLX Energy Services… (KLXE) | 100 | 105.2 | +5.2% |
| National Energy Ser… (NESR) | 100 | 247.1 | +147.1% |
| Dnow Inc. (DNOW) | 100 | 153.0 | +53.0% |
| Baker Hughes Company (BKR) | 100 | 264.0 | +164.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DTI vs KLXE vs NESR vs DNOW vs BKR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, DTI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
KLXE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.
- Beta 0.76 vs NESR's 1.18
NESR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 13.6%, EPS growth 5.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.1%
- Lower P/E (15.3x vs 26.5x)
- +286.0% vs DNOW's -10.8%
DNOW is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 29.9%, current ratio 2.34x
- Beta 0.83, current ratio 2.34x
- 18.8% revenue growth vs KLXE's -10.2%
BKR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 1.4%
- 186.8% 10Y total return vs NESR's 145.5%
- 11.2% margin vs KLXE's -12.1%
- 1.4% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% revenue growth vs KLXE's -10.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.3x vs 26.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.2% margin vs KLXE's -12.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs NESR's 1.18 | |
| Dividends | 1.4% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +286.0% vs DNOW's -10.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.3% ROA vs KLXE's -21.3%, ROIC 12.7% vs -9.4% |
DTI vs KLXE vs NESR vs DNOW vs BKR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DTI vs KLXE vs NESR vs DNOW vs BKR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BKR leads in 3 of 6 categories
NESR leads 1 • DTI leads 0 • KLXE leads 0 • DNOW leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKR is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.9B annually — 180.3x DTI's $155M. BKR is the more profitable business, keeping 11.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KLXE's -12.1%. On growth, DNOW holds the edge at +97.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $155M | $637M | $1.3B | $3.4B | $27.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $38M | $160M | $257M | -$44M | $4.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | -$77M | $70M | -$141M | $3.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9M | -$42M | $46M | $53M | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.7% | +21.2% | +13.9% | +15.6% | +23.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.6% | +10.2% | +8.8% | -2.5% | +25.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | -12.1% | +5.5% | -4.1% | +11.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.7% | -6.5% | +3.6% | +1.6% | +9.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.5% | -5.3% | -12.2% | +97.5% | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.7% | +13.3% | -18.2% | -2.2% | +132.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — DTI and DNOW each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.4x trailing earnings, BKR trades at a 16% valuation discount to NESR's 29.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DTI's 4.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BKR's 14.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $118M | $58M | $2.2B | $1.5B | $63.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $171M | $371M | $2.5B | $2.0B | $66.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -30.36x | -0.79x | 29.19x | -17.43x | 24.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.05x | — | 15.31x | 20.66x | 26.48x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.39x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.73x | 5.71x | 9.07x | — | 14.00x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.74x | 0.09x | 1.72x | 0.55x | 2.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.97x | — | 2.46x | 0.69x | 3.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 18.05x | 11.50x | 24.83x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BKR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BKR delivers a 16.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-8 for DNOW. DNOW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DTI's 0.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NESR scores 8/9 vs DNOW's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.0% | — | +7.3% | -8.4% | +16.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.6% | -21.3% | +3.9% | -5.0% | +7.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.6% | -9.4% | +8.4% | -3.3% | +12.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.6% | -11.4% | +10.9% | -3.9% | +13.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | — | 0.45x | 0.30x | 0.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $53M | $313M | $301M | $505M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $6M | $108M | $164M | $3.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $57M | $318M | $409M | $669M | $7.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.62x | -0.67x | 3.17x | — | 9.68x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NESR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BKR five years ago would be worth $27,526 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,717 for KLXE. Over the past 12 months, NESR leads with a +286.0% total return vs DNOW's -10.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NESR at 94.0% vs KLXE's -31.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +29.5% | +68.0% | +47.9% | -2.2% | +35.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +51.1% | +65.5% | +286.0% | -10.8% | +77.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.3% | -68.3% | +629.7% | +38.3% | +136.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.1% | -72.8% | +72.6% | +13.4% | +175.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.1% | -97.6% | +145.5% | -22.8% | +186.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -31.8% | -31.8% | +94.0% | +11.4% | +33.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KLXE and BKR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KLXE is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NESR's 1.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BKR currently trades 90.2% from its 52-week high vs DTI's 71.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.99x | 0.76x | 1.18x | 0.83x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.69 | $4.06 | $26.85 | $17.26 | $70.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.65 | $1.46 | $5.47 | $10.94 | $35.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.2% | +80.3% | +87.0% | +75.7% | +90.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.1 | 56.9 | 58.8 | 68.2 | 57.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 440K | 307K | 2.1M | 3.2M | 9.1M |
Analyst Outlook
BKR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DTI as "Buy", NESR as "Buy", DNOW as "Buy", BKR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.1% upside for DTI (target: $7) vs 13.3% for BKR (target: $72). BKR is the only dividend payer here at 1.44% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.65 | — | $26.80 | $17.00 | $72.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | — | 6 | 16 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.92 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.4% | +0.6% |
BKR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NESR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
DTI vs KLXE vs NESR vs DNOW vs BKR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DTI or KLXE or NESR or DNOW or BKR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Dnow Inc.
(DNOW) is the stronger pick with 18. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 2% for KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. (KLXE). Baker Hughes Company (BKR) offers the better valuation at 24. 4x trailing P/E (26. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Drilling Tools International Corp. (DTI) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DTI or KLXE or NESR or DNOW or BKR?
On trailing P/E, Baker Hughes Company (BKR) is the cheapest at 24.
4x versus National Energy Services Reunited Corp. at 29. 2x. On forward P/E, National Energy Services Reunited Corp. is actually cheaper at 15. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DTI or KLXE or NESR or DNOW or BKR?
Over the past 5 years, Baker Hughes Company (BKR) delivered a total return of +175.
3%, compared to -72. 8% for KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. (KLXE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BKR returned +186. 8% versus KLXE's -97. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DTI or KLXE or NESR or DNOW or BKR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc.
(KLXE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus National Energy Services Reunited Corp. 's 1. 18β — meaning NESR is approximately 54% more volatile than KLXE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Dnow Inc. (DNOW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 46% for Drilling Tools International Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DTI or KLXE or NESR or DNOW or BKR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dnow Inc.
(DNOW) is pulling ahead at 18. 8% versus -10. 2% for KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. (KLXE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: National Energy Services Reunited Corp. grew EPS 515. 4% year-over-year, compared to -217. 9% for Drilling Tools International Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NESR leads at 14. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DTI or KLXE or NESR or DNOW or BKR?
Baker Hughes Company (BKR) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
3% net margin versus -12. 1% for KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BKR leads at 12. 8% versus -4. 8% for KLXE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DTI leads at 57. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DTI or KLXE or NESR or DNOW or BKR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, National Energy Services Reunited Corp.
(NESR) trades at 15. 3x forward P/E versus 26. 5x for Baker Hughes Company — 11. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DTI: 99. 1% to $6. 65.
08Which pays a better dividend — DTI or KLXE or NESR or DNOW or BKR?
In this comparison, BKR (1.
4% yield) pays a dividend. DTI, KLXE, NESR, DNOW do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DTI or KLXE or NESR or DNOW or BKR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Baker Hughes Company (BKR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
83), 1. 4% yield, +186. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BKR: +186. 8%, NESR: +145. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DTI and KLXE and NESR and DNOW and BKR?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DTI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KLXE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NESR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DNOW is a small-cap high-growth stock; BKR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. BKR pays a dividend while DTI, KLXE, NESR, DNOW do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.