Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

DTSS vs BTBT vs NVDA vs MARA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
DTSS
Datasea Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$9M
5Y Perf.-99.0%
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$589M
5Y Perf.+91.6%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.14T
5Y Perf.+2281.7%
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.83B
5Y Perf.+1714.3%

DTSS vs BTBT vs NVDA vs MARA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
DTSS logoDTSS
BTBT logoBTBT
NVDA logoNVDA
MARA logoMARA
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureFinancial - Capital MarketsSemiconductorsFinancial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$9M$589M$5.14T$4.83B
Revenue (TTM)$57M$164M$215.94B$907M
Net Income (TTM)$-3M$137M$120.07B$-1.31B
Gross Margin7.4%61.9%71.1%-47.7%
Operating Margin-4.7%16.8%60.4%-90.6%
Forward P/E9.2x25.6x
Total Debt$3M$14M$11.41B$3.65B
Cash & Equiv.$621K$95M$10.61B$547M

DTSS vs BTBT vs NVDA vs MARALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

DTSS
BTBT
NVDA
MARA
StockMay 20May 26Return
Datasea Inc. (DTSS)1001.0-99.0%
Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT)100191.6+91.6%
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)1002381.7+2281.7%
Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA)1001814.3+1714.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: DTSS vs BTBT vs NVDA vs MARA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BTBT and NVDA are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. NVIDIA Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. DTSS also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
DTSS
Datasea Inc.
The Defensive Choice

DTSS is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.

  • Beta 1.67 vs BTBT's 3.37
Best for: stability
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and defensive.

  • Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
  • Beta 3.37, yield 0.3%, current ratio 5.39x
  • NIM 0.1% vs MARA's 0.1%
  • 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs MARA's 38.2%
Best for: growth exposure and defensive
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
The Income Pick

NVDA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.73, yield 0.0%
  • 239.0% 10Y total return vs MARA's -51.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.73, Low D/E 7.3%, current ratio 3.91x
  • 55.6% margin vs MARA's -144.6%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
The Financial Play

MARA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: financial services exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBTBT logoBTBT264.6% NII/revenue growth vs MARA's 38.2%
ValueBTBT logoBTBTBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsNVDA logoNVDA55.6% margin vs MARA's -144.6%
Stability / SafetyDTSS logoDTSSBeta 1.67 vs BTBT's 3.37
DividendsBTBT logoBTBT0.3% yield, vs NVDA's 0.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)NVDA logoNVDA+80.7% vs DTSS's -58.2%
Efficiency (ROA)NVDA logoNVDA58.1% ROA vs DTSS's -48.7%, ROIC 81.8% vs -135.0%

DTSS vs BTBT vs NVDA vs MARA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

DTSSDatasea Inc.
FY 2025
Other Member
100.0%$23,716
BTBTBit Digital, Inc.
FY 2024
Other Member
100.0%$550,260
NVDANVIDIA Corporation
FY 2026
Data Center
89.7%$193.7B
Gaming
7.4%$16.0B
Professional Visualization
1.5%$3.2B
Automotive
1.1%$2.3B
OEM And Other
0.3%$619M
MARAMarathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Hosting Services
100.0%$5M

DTSS vs BTBT vs NVDA vs MARA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNVDALAGGINGMARA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

NVDA is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.9B annually — 3795.9x DTSS's $57M. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MARA's -144.6%. On growth, NVDA holds the edge at +73.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricDTSS logoDTSSDatasea Inc.BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.NVDA logoNVDANVIDIA CorporationMARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$57M$164M$215.9B$907M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$1M$166M$133.2B$627M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$3M$137M$120.1B-$1.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$5M-$448M$96.7B-$312M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+7.4%+61.9%+71.1%-47.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-4.7%+16.8%+60.4%-90.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-4.8%+17.3%+55.6%-144.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+8.1%-65.3%+44.8%-34.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-36.5%+73.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+62.5%+2.8%+97.8%-4.8%
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BTBT leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

At 9.2x trailing earnings, BTBT trades at a 79% valuation discount to NVDA's 43.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BTBT's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NVDA's 38.6x.

MetricDTSS logoDTSSDatasea Inc.BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.NVDA logoNVDANVIDIA CorporationMARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
Market CapShares × price$9M$589M$5.14T$4.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$11M$508M$5.14T$7.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.16x9.15x43.16x-3.44x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.25.55x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.45x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.49x38.59x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.13x3.60x23.80x5.32x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.01x0.56x32.85x1.30x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF53.17x
BTBT leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $-5 for DTSS. BTBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MARA's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTBT scores 6/9 vs MARA's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricDTSS logoDTSSDatasea Inc.BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.NVDA logoNVDANVIDIA CorporationMARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-5.0%+21.4%+76.3%-30.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-48.7%+19.0%+58.1%-17.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-135.0%+6.5%+81.8%-9.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-3.7%+8.5%+97.2%-12.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–95643
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.91x0.03x0.07x1.05x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$2M-$81M$807M$3.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$620,807$95M$10.6B$547M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3M$14M$11.4B$3.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense545.03x4.73x
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $142,893 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $223 for DTSS. Over the past 12 months, NVDA leads with a +80.7% total return vs DTSS's -58.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 93.6% vs DTSS's -62.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricDTSS logoDTSSDatasea Inc.BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.NVDA logoNVDANVIDIA CorporationMARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+30.8%-10.3%+12.0%+28.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-58.2%-9.0%+80.7%-4.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-94.7%-19.7%+625.9%+36.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.8%-84.6%+1328.9%-59.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%-60.4%+23902.3%-51.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-62.5%-7.1%+93.6%+10.8%
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — DTSS and NVDA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

DTSS is the less volatile stock with a 1.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVDA currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs DTSS's 32.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricDTSS logoDTSSDatasea Inc.BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.NVDA logoNVDANVIDIA CorporationMARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.67x3.37x1.73x3.11x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.80$4.55$216.80$23.45
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.64$1.25$112.28$6.66
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+32.0%+40.2%+97.6%+54.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10042.869.160.769.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded80K18.5M164.5M47.6M
Evenly matched — DTSS and NVDA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — BTBT and NVDA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: BTBT as "Buy", NVDA as "Buy", MARA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 173.2% upside for BTBT (target: $5) vs 27.0% for MARA (target: $16). BTBT is the only dividend payer here at 0.31% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricDTSS logoDTSSDatasea Inc.BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.NVDA logoNVDANVIDIA CorporationMARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$5.00$278.83$16.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts27919
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.3%+0.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises02
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.01$0.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.8%+1.0%
Evenly matched — BTBT and NVDA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BTBT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallNVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

DTSS vs BTBT vs NVDA vs MARA: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is DTSS or BTBT or NVDA or MARA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 38. 2% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — DTSS or BTBT or NVDA or MARA?

On trailing P/E, Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the cheapest at 9. 2x versus NVIDIA Corporation at 43. 2x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — DTSS or BTBT or NVDA or MARA?

Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1329%, compared to -97.

8% for Datasea Inc. (DTSS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +239. 0% versus DTSS's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — DTSS or BTBT or NVDA or MARA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Datasea Inc.

(DTSS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 67β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 37β — meaning BTBT is approximately 102% more volatile than DTSS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 105% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — DTSS or BTBT or NVDA or MARA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus 38. 2% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -314. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVDA leads at 100. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — DTSS or BTBT or NVDA or MARA?

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.

6% net margin versus -144. 6% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus -90. 6% for MARA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVDA leads at 71. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is DTSS or BTBT or NVDA or MARA more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BTBT: 173.

2% to $5. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — DTSS or BTBT or NVDA or MARA?

In this comparison, BTBT (0.

3% yield) pays a dividend. DTSS, NVDA, MARA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is DTSS or BTBT or NVDA or MARA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+239.

0% 10Y return). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NVDA: +239. 0%, BTBT: -60. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between DTSS and BTBT and NVDA and MARA?

These companies operate in different sectors (DTSS (Technology) and BTBT (Financial Services) and NVDA (Technology) and MARA (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

DTSS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BTBT

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 132%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NVDA

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 36%
  • Net Margin > 33%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MARA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform DTSS and BTBT and NVDA and MARA on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(DTSS: -36.5% · BTBT: 264.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.