Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DUO vs KE vs COMP vs OPEN vs HOUS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Software - Application
Real Estate - Services
Real Estate - Services
DUO vs KE vs COMP vs OPEN vs HOUS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Software - Application | Real Estate - Services | Real Estate - Services |
| Market Cap | $14M | $659M | $4.08B | $4.99B | $1.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $403M | $1.44B | $8.31B | $4.37B | $5.87B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-25M | $26M | $14M | $-1.30B | $-128M |
| Gross Margin | 15.6% | 8.0% | 10.8% | 8.0% | 47.3% |
| Operating Margin | -32.0% | 4.0% | -4.2% | -6.6% | 20.3% |
| Forward P/E | 3.2x | 19.7x | 44.4x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $1M | $147M | $454M | $193M | $3.06B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $75M | $89M | $199M | $962M | $118M |
DUO vs KE vs COMP vs OPEN vs HOUS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fangdd Network Grou… (DUO) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Kimball Electronics… (KE) | 100 | 117.7 | +17.7% |
| Compass, Inc. (COMP) | 100 | 38.2 | -61.8% |
| Opendoor Technologi… (OPEN) | 100 | 25.8 | -74.2% |
| Anywhere Real Estat… (HOUS) | 100 | 81.9 | -18.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DUO vs KE vs COMP vs OPEN vs HOUS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DUO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.69
- Lower volatility, beta 1.69, Low D/E 0.4%, current ratio 1.68x
- Beta 1.69, current ratio 1.68x
- Better valuation composite
KE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 155.7% 10Y total return vs HOUS's -36.7%
- 1.8% margin vs OPEN's -29.7%
- 2.4% ROA vs OPEN's -54.0%, ROIC 4.9% vs -16.6%
COMP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 23.7%, EPS growth 67.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
- 23.7% revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2%
OPEN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +6.1% vs DUO's -57.8%
HOUS is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 0.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.7% revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.8% margin vs OPEN's -29.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.69 vs OPEN's 3.09, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.1% vs DUO's -57.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.4% ROA vs OPEN's -54.0%, ROIC 4.9% vs -16.6% |
DUO vs KE vs COMP vs OPEN vs HOUS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
DUO vs KE vs COMP vs OPEN vs HOUS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KE leads in 2 of 6 categories
HOUS leads 1 • DUO leads 0 • COMP leads 0 • OPEN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — COMP and HOUS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COMP is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.3B annually — 20.6x DUO's $403M. KE is the more profitable business, keeping 1.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OPEN's -29.7%. On growth, COMP holds the edge at +99.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $403M | $1.4B | $8.3B | $4.4B | $5.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$128M | $85M | -$100M | -$287M | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$25M | $26M | $14M | -$1.3B | -$128M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$85M | $98M | $16M | $1.0B | -$41M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.6% | +8.0% | +10.8% | +8.0% | +47.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -32.0% | +4.0% | -4.2% | -6.6% | +20.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.1% | +1.8% | +0.2% | -29.7% | -2.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -21.0% | +6.8% | +0.2% | +23.7% | -0.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +45.3% | -5.8% | +99.4% | -32.1% | +5.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.7% | +53.3% | +133.3% | -7.9% | -2.9% |
Valuation Metrics
KE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.2x trailing earnings, DUO trades at a 92% valuation discount to KE's 39.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KE's 8.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than COMP's 52.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $659M | $4.1B | $5.0B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3M | $717M | $4.3B | $4.2B | $4.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 3.17x | 39.82x | -72.60x | -3.08x | -15.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 19.66x | 44.40x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.69x | 51.99x | — | 18.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.29x | 0.44x | 0.59x | 1.14x | 0.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.25x | 1.19x | 5.27x | 3.99x | 1.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 4.39x | 20.07x | 4.81x | 76.08x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KE delivers a 6.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-129 for OPEN. DUO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HOUS's 1.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DUO scores 5/9 vs HOUS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.5% | +6.0% | +1.1% | -129.4% | -8.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.6% | +2.4% | +0.4% | -54.0% | -2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -49.7% | +4.9% | -2.5% | -16.6% | +1.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -40.2% | +5.7% | -2.9% | -12.3% | +1.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.26x | 0.58x | 0.19x | 1.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$74M | $58M | $255M | -$769M | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $75M | $89M | $199M | $962M | $118M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $147M | $454M | $193M | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 7.36x | -0.12x | — | 0.42x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HOUS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KE five years ago would be worth $11,779 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for DUO. Over the past 12 months, OPEN leads with a +607.7% total return vs DUO's -57.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HOUS at 50.7% vs DUO's -81.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.9% | -5.9% | -30.9% | -13.8% | +26.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -57.8% | +84.6% | -8.2% | +607.7% | +365.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.3% | +31.5% | +191.6% | +192.2% | +242.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +17.8% | -57.5% | -72.4% | +1.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +155.7% | -64.0% | -51.6% | -36.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -81.3% | +9.6% | +42.9% | +43.0% | +50.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DUO and HOUS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DUO is the less volatile stock with a 1.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPEN's 3.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HOUS currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs DUO's 26.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.69x | 1.83x | 1.79x | 3.09x | 1.86x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.08 | $33.19 | $13.96 | $10.87 | $18.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.01 | $14.31 | $5.66 | $0.51 | $3.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +26.3% | +81.6% | +52.0% | +48.1% | +97.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.7 | 55.7 | 38.4 | 49.6 | 77.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 49K | 131K | 14.1M | 36.4M | 11.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KE as "Buy", COMP as "Buy", OPEN as "Hold", HOUS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 96.8% upside for COMP (target: $14) vs 7.7% for HOUS (target: $19). HOUS is the only dividend payer here at 0.15% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $32.00 | $14.29 | $6.50 | $19.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 | 10 | 26 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.8% | 0.0% | +23.7% | +0.2% |
KE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). HOUS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
DUO vs KE vs COMP vs OPEN vs HOUS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DUO or KE or COMP or OPEN or HOUS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Compass, Inc.
(COMP) is the stronger pick with 23. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). Fangdd Network Group Ltd. (DUO) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kimball Electronics, Inc. (KE) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DUO or KE or COMP or OPEN or HOUS?
On trailing P/E, Fangdd Network Group Ltd.
(DUO) is the cheapest at 3. 2x versus Kimball Electronics, Inc. at 39. 8x. On forward P/E, Kimball Electronics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 19. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DUO or KE or COMP or OPEN or HOUS?
Over the past 5 years, Kimball Electronics, Inc.
(KE) delivered a total return of +17. 8%, compared to -100. 0% for Fangdd Network Group Ltd. (DUO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KE returned +155. 7% versus DUO's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DUO or KE or COMP or OPEN or HOUS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fangdd Network Group Ltd.
(DUO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 69β versus Opendoor Technologies Inc. 's 3. 09β — meaning OPEN is approximately 83% more volatile than DUO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fangdd Network Group Ltd. (DUO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 195% for Anywhere Real Estate Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DUO or KE or COMP or OPEN or HOUS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Compass, Inc.
(COMP) is pulling ahead at 23. 7% versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fangdd Network Group Ltd. grew EPS 115. 2% year-over-year, compared to -203. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, COMP leads at 5. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DUO or KE or COMP or OPEN or HOUS?
Fangdd Network Group Ltd.
(DUO) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 1% net margin versus -29. 7% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KE leads at 3. 1% versus -37. 1% for DUO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HOUS leads at 34. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DUO or KE or COMP or OPEN or HOUS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Kimball Electronics, Inc.
(KE) trades at 19. 7x forward P/E versus 44. 4x for Compass, Inc. — 24. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COMP: 96. 8% to $14. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — DUO or KE or COMP or OPEN or HOUS?
In this comparison, HOUS (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. DUO, KE, COMP, OPEN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DUO or KE or COMP or OPEN or HOUS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kimball Electronics, Inc.
(KE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+155. 7% 10Y return). Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN) carries a higher beta of 3. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KE: +155. 7%, OPEN: -51. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DUO and KE and COMP and OPEN and HOUS?
These companies operate in different sectors (DUO (Real Estate) and KE (Industrials) and COMP (Technology) and OPEN (Real Estate) and HOUS (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DUO is a small-cap high-growth stock; KE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; COMP is a small-cap high-growth stock; OPEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HOUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.