Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

DXYZ vs ARCC vs GBDC vs GSBD vs HTGC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
DXYZ
Destiny Tech100 Inc.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.20B
5Y Perf.+118.4%
ARCC
Ares Capital Corporation

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$13.65B
5Y Perf.-8.7%
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC, Inc.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.43B
5Y Perf.-20.9%
GSBD
Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.04B
5Y Perf.-38.1%
HTGC
Hercules Capital, Inc.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.02B
5Y Perf.-12.5%

DXYZ vs ARCC vs GBDC vs GSBD vs HTGC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
DXYZ logoDXYZ
ARCC logoARCC
GBDC logoGBDC
GSBD logoGSBD
HTGC logoHTGC
IndustryAsset ManagementAsset ManagementAsset ManagementAsset ManagementAsset Management
Market Cap$1.20B$13.65B$3.43B$1.04B$3.02B
Revenue (TTM)$-13K$3.15B$871M$242M$547M
Net Income (TTM)$23M$1.15B$205M$112M$289M
Gross Margin-1538.7%75.7%81.5%75.4%87.2%
Operating Margin-1372.4%69.7%78.9%98.4%66.7%
Forward P/E34.1x9.9x9.5x7.5x8.4x
Total Debt$0.00$15.99B$4.90B$1.88B$2.30B
Cash & Equiv.$0.00$924M$24M$43M$57M

DXYZ vs ARCC vs GBDC vs GSBD vs HTGCLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

DXYZ
ARCC
GBDC
GSBD
HTGC
StockMar 24May 26Return
Destiny Tech100 Inc. (DXYZ)100218.4+118.4%
Ares Capital Corpor… (ARCC)10091.3-8.7%
Golub Capital BDC, … (GBDC)10079.1-20.9%
Goldman Sachs BDC, … (GSBD)10061.9-38.1%
Hercules Capital, I… (HTGC)10087.5-12.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: DXYZ vs ARCC vs GBDC vs GSBD vs HTGC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: GBDC and GSBD are tied at the top with 3 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. DXYZ also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
DXYZ
Destiny Tech100 Inc.
The Banking Pick

DXYZ ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 5.1% 10Y total return vs HTGC's 169.5%
  • +44.5% vs ARCC's -0.3%
Best for: long-term compounding
ARCC
Ares Capital Corporation
The Financial Play

ARCC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: financial services exposure
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
The Banking Pick

GBDC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 42.5%, EPS growth 4.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.61, current ratio 5.35x
  • PEG 0.31 vs ARCC's 0.97
  • Beta 0.61, yield 10.5%, current ratio 5.35x
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
GSBD
Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc.
The Banking Pick

GSBD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.46, yield 21.8%
  • Lower P/E (7.5x vs 8.4x)
  • Beta 0.46 vs DXYZ's 1.94
  • 21.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs GBDC's 10.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: income & stability
HTGC
Hercules Capital, Inc.
The Banking Pick

HTGC is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.

  • NIM 9.1% vs ARCC's 3.6%
Best for: bank quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGBDC logoGBDC42.5% NII/revenue growth vs DXYZ's -103.5%
ValueGSBD logoGSBDLower P/E (7.5x vs 8.4x)
Quality / MarginsGBDC logoGBDCEfficiency ratio 0.0% vs HTGC's 0.2% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyGSBD logoGSBDBeta 0.46 vs DXYZ's 1.94
DividendsGSBD logoGSBD21.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs GBDC's 10.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)DXYZ logoDXYZ+44.5% vs ARCC's -0.3%
Efficiency (ROA)GBDC logoGBDCEfficiency ratio 0.0% vs HTGC's 0.2%

DXYZ vs ARCC vs GBDC vs GSBD vs HTGC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLDXYZLAGGINGHTGC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — GSBD and HTGC each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

ARCC and DXYZ operate at a comparable scale, with $3.1B and -$12,698 in trailing revenue. HTGC is the more profitable business, keeping 62.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DXYZ's -1372.4%.

MetricDXYZ logoDXYZDestiny Tech100 I…ARCC logoARCCAres Capital Corp…GBDC logoGBDCGolub Capital BDC…GSBD logoGSBDGoldman Sachs BDC…HTGC logoHTGCHercules Capital,…
RevenueTrailing 12 months-$12,698$3.1B$871M$242M$547M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$14M$2.0B$431M$191M$381M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$23M$1.1B$205M$112M$289M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$8M$1.1B$313M$202M-$352M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-1538.7%+75.7%+81.5%+75.4%+87.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-1372.4%+69.7%+78.9%+98.4%+66.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-1372.4%+41.3%+43.2%+49.2%+62.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-27.4%+36.3%-13.0%+134.3%-77.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+10.2%-63.9%-160.0%-144.4%-20.7%
Evenly matched — GSBD and HTGC each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — GBDC and GSBD each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 8.7x trailing earnings, HTGC trades at a 74% valuation discount to DXYZ's 34.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GBDC offers better value at 0.30x vs ARCC's 0.99x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricDXYZ logoDXYZDestiny Tech100 I…ARCC logoARCCAres Capital Corp…GBDC logoGBDCGolub Capital BDC…GSBD logoGSBDGoldman Sachs BDC…HTGC logoHTGCHercules Capital,…
Market CapShares × price$1.2B$13.6B$3.4B$1.0B$3.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.2B$28.7B$8.3B$2.9B$5.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS34.13x10.22x9.27x9.01x8.73x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.9.94x9.53x7.52x8.36x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.99x0.30x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple68.87x13.11x12.08x12.26x14.41x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.34x3.94x4.31x5.52x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share8.48x0.93x0.88x0.75x1.42x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF3452.95x11.95x3.21x
Evenly matched — GBDC and GSBD each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

DXYZ leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

DXYZ delivers a 33.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $5 for GBDC. HTGC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GSBD's 1.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GSBD scores 6/9 vs GBDC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricDXYZ logoDXYZDestiny Tech100 I…ARCC logoARCCAres Capital Corp…GBDC logoGBDCGolub Capital BDC…GSBD logoGSBDGoldman Sachs BDC…HTGC logoHTGCHercules Capital,…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+33.5%+8.1%+5.2%+7.8%+13.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+32.8%+3.8%+2.3%+3.3%+6.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+21.3%+5.7%+5.9%+5.3%+6.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+27.9%+7.5%+7.8%+7.0%+8.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–944465
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.12x1.23x1.32x1.04x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$0$15.1B$4.9B$1.8B$2.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$0$924M$24M$43M$57M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$16.0B$4.9B$1.9B$2.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense90.58x2.98x1.62x1.28x4.34x
DXYZ leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

DXYZ leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in DXYZ five years ago would be worth $60,678 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,320 for GSBD. Over the past 12 months, DXYZ leads with a +44.5% total return vs ARCC's -0.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DXYZ at 82.4% vs GSBD's 3.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricDXYZ logoDXYZDestiny Tech100 I…ARCC logoARCCAres Capital Corp…GBDC logoGBDCGolub Capital BDC…GSBD logoGSBDGoldman Sachs BDC…HTGC logoHTGCHercules Capital,…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+76.6%-4.6%-0.6%+3.8%-11.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+44.5%-0.3%+2.0%+3.8%+3.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+506.8%+34.5%+35.4%+12.2%+62.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+506.8%+48.0%+33.9%-6.8%+46.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+506.8%+139.6%+61.1%+41.3%+169.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+82.4%+10.4%+10.6%+3.9%+17.5%
DXYZ leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — DXYZ and GSBD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

GSBD is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DXYZ's 1.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DXYZ currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs GSBD's 77.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricDXYZ logoDXYZDestiny Tech100 I…ARCC logoARCCAres Capital Corp…GBDC logoGBDCGolub Capital BDC…GSBD logoGSBDGoldman Sachs BDC…HTGC logoHTGCHercules Capital,…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.94x0.75x0.61x0.46x0.68x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$55.00$23.42$15.63$12.03$19.67
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$19.71$17.40$11.77$8.66$13.70
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.3%+81.2%+84.2%+77.1%+82.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10083.752.949.159.663.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.0M7.4M2.3M1.4M2.4M
Evenly matched — DXYZ and GSBD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

GSBD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: ARCC as "Buy", GBDC as "Buy", GSBD as "Hold", HTGC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.4% upside for HTGC (target: $19) vs -3.0% for GSBD (target: $9). For income investors, GSBD offers the higher dividend yield at 21.77% vs ARCC's 2.02%.

MetricDXYZ logoDXYZDestiny Tech100 I…ARCC logoARCCAres Capital Corp…GBDC logoGBDCGolub Capital BDC…GSBD logoGSBDGoldman Sachs BDC…HTGC logoHTGCHercules Capital,…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$21.88$14.25$9.00$18.63
# AnalystsCovering analysts3211931
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.0%+10.5%+21.8%+8.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10010
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.38$1.38$2.02$1.42
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+2.3%+5.0%+0.2%
GSBD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

DXYZ leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). GSBD leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 3 tied.

Best OverallDestiny Tech100 Inc. (DXYZ)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

DXYZ vs ARCC vs GBDC vs GSBD vs HTGC: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is DXYZ or ARCC or GBDC or GSBD or HTGC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Golub Capital BDC, Inc.

(GBDC) is the stronger pick with 42. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -103. 5% for Destiny Tech100 Inc. (DXYZ). Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC) offers the better valuation at 8. 7x trailing P/E (8. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — DXYZ or ARCC or GBDC or GSBD or HTGC?

On trailing P/E, Hercules Capital, Inc.

(HTGC) is the cheapest at 8. 7x versus Destiny Tech100 Inc. at 34. 1x. On forward P/E, Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Golub Capital BDC, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus Ares Capital Corporation's 0. 97x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — DXYZ or ARCC or GBDC or GSBD or HTGC?

Over the past 5 years, Destiny Tech100 Inc.

(DXYZ) delivered a total return of +506. 8%, compared to -6. 8% for Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. (GSBD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DXYZ returned +506. 8% versus GSBD's +41. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — DXYZ or ARCC or GBDC or GSBD or HTGC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc.

(GSBD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Destiny Tech100 Inc. 's 1. 94β — meaning DXYZ is approximately 321% more volatile than GSBD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 104% versus 132% for Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — DXYZ or ARCC or GBDC or GSBD or HTGC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Golub Capital BDC, Inc.

(GBDC) is pulling ahead at 42. 5% versus -103. 5% for Destiny Tech100 Inc. (DXYZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Destiny Tech100 Inc. grew EPS 521. 1% year-over-year, compared to -23. 8% for Ares Capital Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — DXYZ or ARCC or GBDC or GSBD or HTGC?

Hercules Capital, Inc.

(HTGC) is the more profitable company, earning 62. 1% net margin versus -1372. 4% for Destiny Tech100 Inc. — meaning it keeps 62. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GSBD leads at 98. 4% versus -1372. 4% for DXYZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HTGC leads at 87. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is DXYZ or ARCC or GBDC or GSBD or HTGC more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus Ares Capital Corporation's 0. 97x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. (GSBD) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 9. 9x for Ares Capital Corporation — 2. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HTGC: 15. 4% to $18. 63.

08

Which pays a better dividend — DXYZ or ARCC or GBDC or GSBD or HTGC?

In this comparison, GSBD (21.

8% yield), GBDC (10. 5% yield), HTGC (8. 8% yield), ARCC (2. 0% yield) pay a dividend. DXYZ does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is DXYZ or ARCC or GBDC or GSBD or HTGC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc.

(GSBD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 21. 8% yield). Destiny Tech100 Inc. (DXYZ) carries a higher beta of 1. 94 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GSBD: +41. 3%, DXYZ: +506. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between DXYZ and ARCC and GBDC and GSBD and HTGC?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: DXYZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARCC is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GBDC is a small-cap high-growth stock; GSBD is a small-cap high-growth stock; HTGC is a small-cap high-growth stock. ARCC, GBDC, GSBD, HTGC pay a dividend while DXYZ does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

DXYZ

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ARCC

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 16%
  • Net Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GBDC

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 21%
  • Net Margin > 25%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GSBD

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 12%
  • Net Margin > 29%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HTGC

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Net Margin > 37%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform DXYZ and ARCC and GBDC and GSBD and HTGC on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(DXYZ: -103.5% · ARCC: 32.9%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(DXYZ: 34.1x · ARCC: 10.2x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.