Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DYCQ vs ACIC vs GFAI vs TPVG vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Security & Protection Services
Asset Management
Specialty Retail
DYCQ vs ACIC vs GFAI vs TPVG vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Security & Protection Services | Asset Management | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $23M | $525M | $10M | $243M | $2.92T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $335M | $72M | $97M | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1M | $107M | $-24M | $-12M | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | — | 63.8% | 15.1% | 83.5% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | 42.6% | -27.4% | 77.9% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 28.7x | 7.5x | — | 6.2x | 31.4x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $152M | $3M | $469M | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $152K | $199M | $22M | $20M | $86.81B |
DYCQ vs ACIC vs GFAI vs TPVG vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 24 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| DT Cloud Acquisitio… (DYCQ) | 100 | 110.3 | +10.3% |
| American Coastal In… (ACIC) | 100 | 120.6 | +20.6% |
| Guardforce AI Co., … (GFAI) | 100 | 19.4 | -80.6% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 69.6 | -30.4% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 131.9 | +31.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DYCQ vs ACIC vs GFAI vs TPVG vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DYCQ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends and efficiency is your priority.
- 4.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs TPVG's 17.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
- 66.5% ROA vs GFAI's -50.2%, ROIC -1.6% vs -41.6%
ACIC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 13.1%, EPS growth 40.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 48.0%, current ratio 1.22x
- Beta 0.39, current ratio 1.22x
- Beta 0.39 vs GFAI's 2.31
Among these 5 stocks, GFAI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TPVG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 17.1%
- 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs DYCQ's -81.8%
- Better valuation composite
- 50.6% margin vs GFAI's -32.9%
AMZN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs ACIC's -22.2%
- PEG 1.12 vs TPVG's 6.14
- +43.7% vs GFAI's -53.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs DYCQ's -81.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 50.6% margin vs GFAI's -32.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs GFAI's 2.31 | |
| Dividends | 4.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs TPVG's 17.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.7% vs GFAI's -53.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 66.5% ROA vs GFAI's -50.2%, ROIC -1.6% vs -41.6% |
DYCQ vs ACIC vs GFAI vs TPVG vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
DYCQ vs ACIC vs GFAI vs TPVG vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TPVG leads in 1 of 6 categories
GFAI leads 1 • ACIC leads 1 • DYCQ leads 0 • AMZN leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN and DYCQ operate at a comparable scale, with $742.8B and $0 in trailing revenue. TPVG is the more profitable business, keeping 50.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GFAI's -32.9%. On growth, AMZN holds the edge at +16.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $335M | $72M | $97M | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | $154M | -$12M | -$22M | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1M | $107M | -$24M | -$12M | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$663,248 | $71M | -$6M | $35M | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +63.8% | +15.1% | +83.5% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +42.6% | -27.4% | +77.9% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +31.9% | -32.9% | +50.6% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +21.1% | -8.8% | -58.7% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +9.3% | +3.6% | — | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.1% | +4.3% | +38.9% | -2.3% | +74.8% |
Valuation Metrics
GFAI leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, TPVG trades at a 87% valuation discount to AMZN's 37.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMZN offers better value at 1.35x vs TPVG's 4.84x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $23M | $525M | $10M | $243M | $2.92T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $23M | $478M | -$9M | $691M | $2.98T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 28.67x | 5.05x | -0.89x | 4.91x | 37.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.49x | — | 6.23x | 31.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 4.84x | 1.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.11x | 2.93x | — | 9.13x | 20.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.56x | 0.28x | 2.50x | 4.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.93x | 1.70x | 0.16x | 0.68x | 7.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.40x | — | — | 378.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACIC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACIC delivers a 35.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-70 for GFAI. GFAI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TPVG's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACIC scores 6/9 vs DYCQ's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.4% | +35.7% | -69.7% | -3.4% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +66.5% | +9.0% | -50.2% | -1.5% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.6% | +41.0% | -41.6% | +7.2% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.0% | +26.0% | -19.1% | +9.4% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.48x | 0.08x | 1.33x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$152,021 | -$46M | -$19M | $449M | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $152,021 | $199M | $22M | $20M | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $152M | $3M | $469M | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 14.20x | -167.24x | -1.02x | 39.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ACIC and AMZN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACIC five years ago would be worth $20,705 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $46 for GFAI. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +43.7% total return vs GFAI's -53.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACIC at 37.3% vs GFAI's -60.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | 0.0% | +1.9% | -26.3% | -6.3% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.4% | -0.3% | -53.2% | +19.3% | +43.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.7% | +159.1% | -93.8% | -3.4% | +156.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.7% | +107.0% | -99.5% | -13.5% | +64.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.7% | -22.2% | -99.5% | +93.3% | +697.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.4% | +37.3% | -60.4% | -1.2% | +36.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DYCQ and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DYCQ is the less volatile stock with a -0.17 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GFAI's 2.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs GFAI's 31.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.17x | 0.24x | 2.36x | 0.77x | 1.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.30 | $13.06 | $1.50 | $7.53 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.67 | $9.79 | $0.38 | $4.48 | $185.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.2% | +83.1% | +31.5% | +79.5% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.8 | 31.0 | 47.0 | 58.3 | 81.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 990 | 188K | 378K | 504K | 45.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — DYCQ and ACIC and TPVG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ACIC as "Hold", TPVG as "Hold", AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.4% upside for TPVG (target: $9) vs -82.5% for ACIC (target: $2). For income investors, TPVG offers the higher dividend yield at 17.11% vs DYCQ's 4.56%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $1.90 | — | $8.95 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 | — | 12 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.6% | — | — | +17.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.51 | — | — | $1.02 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TPVG leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). GFAI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
DYCQ vs ACIC vs GFAI vs TPVG vs AMZN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DYCQ or ACIC or GFAI or TPVG or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger pick with 36. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 2% for Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (6. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) a "Buy" — based on 94 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DYCQ or ACIC or GFAI or TPVG or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the cheapest at 4. 9x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 37. 8x. On forward P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Amazon. com, Inc. wins at 1. 12x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 6. 14x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DYCQ or ACIC or GFAI or TPVG or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) delivered a total return of +107.
0%, compared to -99. 5% for Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +702. 2% versus GFAI's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DYCQ or ACIC or GFAI or TPVG or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), DT Cloud Acquisition Corporation (DYCQ) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
17β versus Guardforce AI Co. , Limited's 2. 36β — meaning GFAI is approximately -1518% more volatile than DYCQ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 133% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DYCQ or ACIC or GFAI or TPVG or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is pulling ahead at 36. 6% versus 0. 2% for Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DT Cloud Acquisition Corporation grew EPS 35. 8% year-over-year, compared to 29. 7% for Amazon. com, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACIC leads at 15. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DYCQ or ACIC or GFAI or TPVG or AMZN?
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus -16. 1% for Guardforce AI Co. , Limited — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus -18. 5% for GFAI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACIC leads at 86. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DYCQ or ACIC or GFAI or TPVG or AMZN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 12x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 6. 14x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 31. 4x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 25. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TPVG: 49. 4% to $8. 95.
08Which pays a better dividend — DYCQ or ACIC or GFAI or TPVG or AMZN?
In this comparison, TPVG (17.
1% yield), DYCQ (4. 6% yield) pay a dividend. ACIC, GFAI, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DYCQ or ACIC or GFAI or TPVG or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, DT Cloud Acquisition Corporation (DYCQ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
17), 4. 6% yield). Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI) carries a higher beta of 2. 36 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DYCQ: +10. 7%, GFAI: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DYCQ and ACIC and GFAI and TPVG and AMZN?
These companies operate in different sectors (DYCQ (Financial Services) and ACIC (Financial Services) and GFAI (Industrials) and TPVG (Financial Services) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DYCQ is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ACIC is a small-cap deep-value stock; GFAI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. DYCQ, TPVG pay a dividend while ACIC, GFAI, AMZN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.