Asset Management
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
EARN vs MITT vs EFC vs MFA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
EARN vs MITT vs EFC vs MFA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $183M | $249M | $1.35B | $995M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $51M | $493M | $429M | $650M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $34M | $147M | $135M |
| Gross Margin | 31.3% | 94.2% | 88.6% | 59.3% |
| Operating Margin | 14.0% | 93.3% | 63.0% | 41.0% |
| Forward P/E | 4.6x | 7.2x | 7.5x | 7.1x |
| Total Debt | $563M | $8.10B | $16.96B | $10.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $32M | $76M | $202M | $213M |
EARN vs MITT vs EFC vs MFA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ellington Credit Co… (EARN) | 100 | 51.4 | -48.6% |
| TPG Mortgage Invest… (MITT) | 100 | 106.2 | +6.2% |
| Ellington Financial… (EFC) | 100 | 133.2 | +33.2% |
| MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) | 100 | 144.2 | +44.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EARN vs MITT vs EFC vs MFA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EARN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.63, current ratio 0.13x
- Lower P/E (4.6x vs 7.1x)
MITT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +29.0% vs EARN's +8.0%
EFC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 139.0%, EPS growth -12.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 150.0%
- 77.3% 10Y total return vs MFA's 7.8%
- 34.2% margin vs MITT's 6.8%
- Beta 0.47 vs MITT's 0.90, lower leverage
MFA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.77, yield 18.4%
- Beta 0.77, yield 18.4%, current ratio 2.18x
- 213.0% FFO/revenue growth vs EARN's -8.4%
- 18.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs EARN's 16.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 213.0% FFO/revenue growth vs EARN's -8.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.6x vs 7.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.2% margin vs MITT's 6.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs MITT's 0.90, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 18.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs EARN's 16.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.0% vs EARN's +8.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.1% ROA vs EARN's -0.6%, ROIC 4.4% vs 0.7% |
EARN vs MITT vs EFC vs MFA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
EARN vs MITT vs EFC vs MFA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EFC leads in 2 of 6 categories
EARN leads 1 • MITT leads 1 • MFA leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EFC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MFA is the larger business by revenue, generating $650M annually — 12.8x EARN's $51M. EFC is the more profitable business, keeping 34.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MITT's 6.8%. On growth, EFC holds the edge at +123.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $51M | $493M | $429M | $650M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | $457M | $301M | $268M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | $34M | $147M | $135M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $20M | $68M | -$925M | $91M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.3% | +94.2% | +88.6% | +59.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.0% | +93.3% | +63.0% | +41.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.0% | +6.8% | +34.2% | +20.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +13.8% | -2.2% | +14.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +20.9% | +123.0% | +118.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.1% | -2.3% | -44.0% | -103.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MITT and MFA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.8x trailing earnings, MFA trades at a 71% valuation discount to EARN's 20.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MFA's 17.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EARN's 100.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $183M | $249M | $1.4B | $995M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $714M | $8.3B | $18.1B | $11.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.29x | 8.71x | 11.42x | 5.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 4.62x | 7.20x | 7.47x | 7.11x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.46x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 100.63x | 18.25x | 39.45x | 17.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.61x | 0.53x | 2.00x | 1.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.68x | 0.43x | 0.72x | 0.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.07x | 4.18x | 2.66x | 13.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EARN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EFC delivers a 8.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-3 for EARN. EARN carries lower financial leverage with a 2.91x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MITT's 14.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EARN scores 8/9 vs MITT's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.8% | +6.1% | +8.4% | +7.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.6% | +0.4% | +0.8% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.7% | +4.5% | +3.1% | +4.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.7% | +6.5% | +2.7% | +5.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.91x | 14.45x | 9.07x | 6.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $531M | $8.0B | $16.8B | $10.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $32M | $76M | $202M | $213M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $563M | $8.1B | $17.0B | $11.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.16x | 1.12x | 1.51x | 1.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MITT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EFC five years ago would be worth $12,153 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,259 for EARN. Over the past 12 months, MITT leads with a +29.0% total return vs EARN's +8.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MITT at 23.4% vs EARN's 3.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.1% | -5.6% | +3.1% | +6.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.0% | +29.0% | +18.5% | +19.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.7% | +87.9% | +51.9% | +34.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.4% | -3.5% | +21.5% | -0.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.3% | -16.9% | +77.3% | +7.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.7% | +23.4% | +15.0% | +10.3% |
Risk & Volatility
EFC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EFC is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MITT's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EFC currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs EARN's 80.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 0.90x | 0.47x | 0.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.08 | $9.27 | $14.12 | $10.57 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.27 | $6.52 | $11.28 | $8.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.1% | +84.6% | +96.2% | +92.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.4 | 50.5 | 69.7 | 43.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 483K | 277K | 1.6M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
MFA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EARN as "Hold", MITT as "Buy", EFC as "Buy", MFA as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 23.2% upside for EARN (target: $6) vs -0.7% for EFC (target: $14). For income investors, MFA offers the higher dividend yield at 18.36% vs MITT's 10.04%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.00 | $9.63 | $13.50 | $10.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 18 | 13 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +16.8% | +10.0% | +13.6% | +18.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.82 | $0.79 | $1.85 | $1.79 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.5% |
EFC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). EARN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
EARN vs MITT vs EFC vs MFA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EARN or MITT or EFC or MFA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MFA Financial, Inc.
(MFA) is the stronger pick with 213. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 4% for Ellington Credit Company (EARN). MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) offers the better valuation at 5. 8x trailing P/E (7. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc (MITT) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EARN or MITT or EFC or MFA?
On trailing P/E, MFA Financial, Inc.
(MFA) is the cheapest at 5. 8x versus Ellington Credit Company at 20. 3x. On forward P/E, Ellington Credit Company is actually cheaper at 4. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EARN or MITT or EFC or MFA?
Over the past 5 years, Ellington Financial Inc.
(EFC) delivered a total return of +21. 5%, compared to -17. 4% for Ellington Credit Company (EARN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EFC returned +77. 3% versus MITT's -16. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EARN or MITT or EFC or MFA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ellington Financial Inc.
(EFC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc's 0. 90β — meaning MITT is approximately 92% more volatile than EFC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ellington Credit Company (EARN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 14% for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EARN or MITT or EFC or MFA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MFA Financial, Inc.
(MFA) is pulling ahead at 213. 0% versus -8. 4% for Ellington Credit Company (EARN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MFA Financial, Inc. grew EPS 104. 9% year-over-year, compared to -26. 8% for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc. Over a 3-year CAGR, EFC leads at 150. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EARN or MITT or EFC or MFA?
Ellington Financial Inc.
(EFC) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 8% net margin versus 10. 3% for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc — meaning it keeps 21. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MITT leads at 96. 9% versus 14. 0% for EARN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MFA leads at 96. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EARN or MITT or EFC or MFA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ellington Credit Company (EARN) trades at 4.
6x forward P/E versus 7. 5x for Ellington Financial Inc. — 2. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EARN: 23. 2% to $6. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — EARN or MITT or EFC or MFA?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) offers the highest yield at 18. 4%, versus 10. 0% for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc (MITT).
09Is EARN or MITT or EFC or MFA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ellington Financial Inc.
(EFC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 47), 13. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EFC: +77. 3%, MITT: -16. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EARN and MITT and EFC and MFA?
These companies operate in different sectors (EARN (Financial Services) and MITT (Real Estate) and EFC (Real Estate) and MFA (Unknown)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: EARN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MITT is a small-cap deep-value stock; EFC is a small-cap high-growth stock; MFA is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.