Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
ECBK logo
ECBK
MNSB logo
MNSB
NBTB logo
NBTB
CARE logo
CARE
KO logo
KO
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ECBK vs MNSB vs NBTB vs CARE vs KO vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ECBK
ECB Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$178M
5Y Perf.+45.3%
MNSB
MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$176M
5Y Perf.+3.1%
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.44B
5Y Perf.+15.1%
CARE
Carter Bankshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$686M
5Y Perf.+121.9%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$341.71B
5Y Perf.+23.7%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$908.57B
5Y Perf.+181.9%

ECBK vs MNSB vs NBTB vs CARE vs KO vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ECBK logoECBK
MNSB logoMNSB
NBTB logoNBTB
CARE logoCARE
KO logoKO
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBeverages - Non-AlcoholicBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$178M$176M$2.44B$686M$341.71B$908.57B
Revenue (TTM)$80M$135M$902M$252M$49.28B$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$8M$16M$169M$31M$13.70B$57.05B
Gross Margin39.9%54.3%73.6%61.2%61.7%60.0%
Operating Margin13.1%14.1%24.3%15.9%29.3%25.9%
Forward P/E21.6x10.6x11.2x5.7x24.3x14.6x
Total Debt$285M$70M$327M$179M$45.49B$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$95M$26M$185M$105M$10.27B$343.34B

ECBK vs MNSB vs NBTB vs CARE vs KO vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ECBK
MNSB
NBTB
CARE
KO
JPM
StockJul 22Jun 26Return
ECB Bancorp, Inc. (ECBK)100145.3+45.3%
MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB)100103.1+3.1%
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB)100115.1+15.1%
Carter Bankshares, … (CARE)100221.9+121.9%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100123.7+23.7%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100281.9+181.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ECBK vs MNSB vs NBTB vs CARE vs KO vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ECBK and KO are tied at the top with 2 categories each (6-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. The Coca-Cola Company is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. NBTB, CARE, and JPM also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ECBK
ECB Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

ECBK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 16.5%, EPS growth 95.8%
  • 16.5% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4%
  • Beta 0.44 vs JPM's 0.87, lower leverage
Best for: growth exposure
MNSB
MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

MNSB is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.

  • NIM 3.1% vs ECBK's 2.0%
Best for: bank quality
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.
The Banking Pick

NBTB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 3.1%
  • Beta 0.73, yield 3.1%, current ratio 1.60x
  • 3.1% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
CARE
Carter Bankshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CARE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 42.5%, current ratio 0.75x
  • +86.8% vs KO's +17.7%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Quality Compounder

KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • 27.8% margin vs ECBK's 9.8%
  • 13.1% ROA vs ECBK's 0.5%, ROIC 15.8% vs 1.8%
Best for: quality and efficiency
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 481.2% 10Y total return vs CARE's 150.2%
  • PEG 0.83 vs KO's 2.17
  • Lower P/E (14.6x vs 24.3x), PEG 0.83 vs 2.17
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthECBK logoECBK16.5% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4%
ValueJPM logoJPMLower P/E (14.6x vs 24.3x), PEG 0.83 vs 2.17
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs ECBK's 9.8%
Stability / SafetyECBK logoECBKBeta 0.44 vs JPM's 0.87, lower leverage
DividendsNBTB logoNBTB3.1% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)CARE logoCARE+86.8% vs KO's +17.7%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs ECBK's 0.5%, ROIC 15.8% vs 1.8%

ECBK vs MNSB vs NBTB vs CARE vs KO vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ECBKECB Bancorp, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

MNSBMainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Core Banking Segment
100.0%$134M
NBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
FY 2025
Insurance Revenue
100.0%$18M
CARECarter Bankshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Bank Owned Life Insurance Income
74.0%$2M
Other Revenue
26.0%$532,000
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

ECBK vs MNSB vs NBTB vs CARE vs KO vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGJPM

Who Leads Where

KO leads in 2 of 6 categories

MNSB leads 1 • ECBK leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • CARE leads 0 • JPM leads 0 • 3 tied

Explore the data ↓
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
0leads
CARECarter Bankshares, In…
0leads
NBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
0leads
ECBKECB Bancorp, Inc.
0leads
MNSBMainStreet Bancshares…
1leads
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
2leads
6 Total Categories

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 3525.9x ECBK's $80M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ECBK's 9.8%.

MetricECBK logoECBKECB Bancorp, Inc.MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$80M$135M$902M$252M$49.3B$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$11M$23M$241M$46M$15.5B$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$8M$16M$169M$31M$13.7B$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$9M$11M$225M$30M$12.6B$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+39.9%+54.3%+73.6%+61.2%+61.7%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+13.1%+14.1%+24.3%+15.9%+29.3%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+9.8%+11.5%+18.8%+12.5%+27.8%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+11.3%+7.9%+24.9%+11.9%+25.5%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+82.4%+120.9%+39.5%+8.3%+18.2%+16.0%
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MNSB leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 13.6x trailing earnings, MNSB trades at a 48% valuation discount to KO's 26.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.92x vs KO's 2.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricECBK logoECBKECB Bancorp, Inc.MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$178M$176M$2.4B$686M$341.7B$908.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$368M$219M$2.6B$759M$376.9B$1.51T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS21.61x13.56x14.02x22.11x26.12x16.22x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.56x11.18x5.67x24.27x14.60x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.16x1.99x2.34x0.92x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple35.47x11.48x10.70x18.98x25.45x18.52x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.24x1.29x2.81x2.69x7.13x3.25x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.98x0.84x1.25x1.66x9.99x2.51x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF19.80x16.52x11.13x21.57x64.52x9.01x
MNSB leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $5 for ECBK. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CARE scores 8/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricECBK logoECBKECB Bancorp, Inc.MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+4.6%+7.3%+9.5%+7.6%+41.1%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.5%+0.7%+1.1%+0.7%+13.1%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+1.8%+5.0%+7.9%+5.7%+15.8%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.3%+6.0%+2.4%+1.5%+17.3%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9757875
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.66x0.32x0.17x0.43x1.33x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$190M$43M$142M$73M$35.2B$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$95M$26M$185M$105M$10.3B$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$285M$70M$327M$179M$45.5B$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.22x0.31x1.05x0.39x10.70x0.74x
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — CARE and JPM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CARE five years ago would be worth $23,985 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,777 for MNSB. Over the past 12 months, CARE leads with a +86.8% total return vs KO's +17.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.7% vs MNSB's 2.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricECBK logoECBKECB Bancorp, Inc.MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+17.3%+21.1%+14.0%+59.9%+16.4%+0.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+34.3%+33.1%+20.5%+86.8%+17.7%+20.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+55.6%+8.4%+49.9%+103.8%+39.3%+138.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+44.1%+17.8%+46.9%+139.8%+65.3%+135.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+44.1%+126.0%+103.1%+150.2%+115.0%+481.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+15.9%+2.7%+14.5%+26.8%+11.7%+33.7%
Evenly matched — CARE and JPM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ECBK and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ECBK currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs KO's 94.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricECBK logoECBKECB Bancorp, Inc.MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.45x0.57x0.73x0.50x-0.24x0.87x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$20.50$25.19$48.81$31.40$84.04$338.09
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$14.82$17.86$39.20$16.27$65.35$269.72
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.1%+94.7%+95.6%+98.6%+94.5%+96.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10059.450.351.076.849.272.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded11K45K277K323K13.6M7.4M
Evenly matched — ECBK and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — NBTB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: MNSB as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", CARE as "Hold", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.5% upside for KO (target: $86) vs -7.9% for CARE (target: $29). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.06% vs MNSB's 1.67%.

MetricECBK logoECBKECB Bancorp, Inc.MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$46.00$28.50$86.13$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts11054861
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.7%+3.1%+2.6%+1.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01305615
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.40$1.43$2.04$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.6%+2.5%+0.4%+2.9%+0.2%+3.8%
Evenly matched — NBTB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MNSB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ECBK vs MNSB vs NBTB vs CARE vs KO vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ECBK or MNSB or NBTB or CARE or KO or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, ECB Bancorp, Inc.

(ECBK) is the stronger pick with 16. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB) offers the better valuation at 13. 6x trailing P/E (10. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Coca-Cola Company (KO) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ECBK or MNSB or NBTB or CARE or KO or JPM?

On trailing P/E, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.

(MNSB) is the cheapest at 13. 6x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 26. 1x. On forward P/E, Carter Bankshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 83x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 17x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ECBK or MNSB or NBTB or CARE or KO or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, Carter Bankshares, Inc.

(CARE) delivered a total return of +139. 8%, compared to +17. 8% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +481. 2% versus ECBK's +44. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ECBK or MNSB or NBTB or CARE or KO or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

24β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 87β — meaning JPM is approximately -468% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ECBK or MNSB or NBTB or CARE or KO or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ECB Bancorp, Inc.

(ECBK) is pulling ahead at 16. 5% versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ECBK or MNSB or NBTB or CARE or KO or JPM?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus 9. 8% for ECB Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 13. 1% for ECBK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ECBK or MNSB or NBTB or CARE or KO or JPM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 83x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 17x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Carter Bankshares, Inc. (CARE) trades at 5. 7x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 18. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KO: 8. 5% to $86. 13.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ECBK or MNSB or NBTB or CARE or KO or JPM?

In this comparison, NBTB (3.

1% yield), KO (2. 6% yield), JPM (1. 8% yield), MNSB (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. ECBK, CARE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is ECBK or MNSB or NBTB or CARE or KO or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

24), 2. 6% yield, +115. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +115. 0%, ECBK: +44. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ECBK and MNSB and NBTB and CARE and KO and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (ECBK (Financial Services) and MNSB (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and CARE (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ECBK is a small-cap high-growth stock; MNSB is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CARE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. MNSB, NBTB, KO, JPM pay a dividend while ECBK, CARE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.