Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ECL vs CHD

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ECL
Ecolab Inc.

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$72.77B
5Y Perf.+21.2%
CHD
Church & Dwight Co., Inc.

Household & Personal Products

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$22.15B
5Y Perf.+24.6%

ECL vs CHD — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ECL logoECL
CHD logoCHD
IndustryChemicals - SpecialtyHousehold & Personal Products
Market Cap$72.77B$22.15B
Revenue (TTM)$16.08B$6.21B
Net Income (TTM)$2.08B$733M
Gross Margin44.5%45.1%
Operating Margin17.7%17.3%
Forward P/E30.8x24.9x
Total Debt$9.43B$2.21B
Cash & Equiv.$646M$409M

ECL vs CHDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ECL
CHD
StockMay 20May 26Return
Ecolab Inc. (ECL)100121.2+21.2%
Church & Dwight Co.… (CHD)100124.6+24.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ECL vs CHD

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CHD leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. Ecolab Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ECL
Ecolab Inc.
The Growth Play

ECL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 2.2%, EPS growth -1.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.3%
  • 141.3% 10Y total return vs CHD's 117.3%
  • 2.2% revenue growth vs CHD's 1.6%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
CHD
Church & Dwight Co., Inc.
The Income Pick

CHD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 0.14, yield 1.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.14, Low D/E 55.1%, current ratio 1.07x
  • Beta 0.14, yield 1.3%, current ratio 1.07x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthECL logoECL2.2% revenue growth vs CHD's 1.6%
ValueCHD logoCHDLower P/E (24.9x vs 30.8x)
Quality / MarginsECL logoECL12.9% margin vs CHD's 11.8%
Stability / SafetyCHD logoCHDBeta 0.14 vs ECL's 0.63, lower leverage
DividendsCHD logoCHD1.3% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs ECL's 1.0%
Momentum (1Y)CHD logoCHD+2.1% vs ECL's +2.1%
Efficiency (ROA)ECL logoECL8.8% ROA vs CHD's 8.2%, ROIC 12.7% vs 13.9%

ECL vs CHD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ECLEcolab Inc.
FY 2025
Global Water
49.6%$8.0B
Global Institutional and Specialty
38.0%$6.1B
Global Pest Elimination
7.8%$1.2B
Global Life Sciences
4.7%$748M
CHDChurch & Dwight Co., Inc.
FY 2025
Specialty Products Division
100.0%$299M

ECL vs CHD — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCHDLAGGINGECL

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ECL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

ECL is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.1B annually — 2.6x CHD's $6.2B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 12.9% (ECL) to 11.8% (CHD). On growth, ECL holds the edge at +4.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricECL logoECLEcolab Inc.CHD logoCHDChurch & Dwight C…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$16.1B$6.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$3.5B$1.3B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$2.1B$733M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$1.9B$1.1B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+44.5%+45.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+17.7%+17.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+12.9%+11.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+11.8%+17.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.8%+0.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+19.3%+2.2%
ECL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CHD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 31.0x trailing earnings, CHD trades at a 12% valuation discount to ECL's 35.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CHD's 18.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ECL's 22.7x.

MetricECL logoECLEcolab Inc.CHD logoCHDChurch & Dwight C…
Market CapShares × price$72.8B$22.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$81.5B$24.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS35.39x30.97x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.30.77x24.91x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple22.75x18.08x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.52x3.57x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share7.49x5.71x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF38.21x20.27x
CHD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CHD leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

ECL delivers a 22.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $17 for CHD. CHD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.55x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ECL's 0.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHD scores 7/9 vs ECL's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricECL logoECLEcolab Inc.CHD logoCHDChurch & Dwight C…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+22.0%+17.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+8.8%+8.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+12.7%+13.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+15.8%+14.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–957
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.96x0.55x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$8.8B$1.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$646M$409M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$9.4B$2.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense9.82x15.59x
CHD leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ECL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ECL five years ago would be worth $11,806 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,219 for CHD. Over the past 12 months, CHD leads with a +2.1% total return vs ECL's +2.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ECL at 15.1% vs CHD's -0.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricECL logoECLEcolab Inc.CHD logoCHDChurch & Dwight C…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-1.6%+13.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+2.1%+2.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+52.6%-0.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+18.1%+12.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+141.3%+117.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+15.1%-0.2%
ECL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

CHD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

CHD is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ECL's 0.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CHD currently trades 88.2% from its 52-week high vs ECL's 83.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricECL logoECLEcolab Inc.CHD logoCHDChurch & Dwight C…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.63x0.14x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$309.27$106.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$249.04$81.33
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+83.3%+88.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10035.441.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.4M1.9M
CHD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CHD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates ECL as "Buy" and CHD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.0% upside for ECL (target: $327) vs 6.5% for CHD (target: $100). For income investors, CHD offers the higher dividend yield at 1.26% vs ECL's 1.03%.

MetricECL logoECLEcolab Inc.CHD logoCHDChurch & Dwight C…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$327.11$99.60
# AnalystsCovering analysts3734
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.0%+1.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1223
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.64$1.18
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.1%+4.1%
CHD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CHD leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). ECL leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns).

Best OverallChurch & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ECL vs CHD: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ECL or CHD a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Ecolab Inc.

(ECL) is the stronger pick with 2. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 6% for Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. (CHD). Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. (CHD) offers the better valuation at 31. 0x trailing P/E (24. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ecolab Inc. (ECL) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ECL or CHD?

On trailing P/E, Church & Dwight Co.

, Inc. (CHD) is the cheapest at 31. 0x versus Ecolab Inc. at 35. 4x. On forward P/E, Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. is actually cheaper at 24. 9x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ECL or CHD?

Over the past 5 years, Ecolab Inc.

(ECL) delivered a total return of +18. 1%, compared to +12. 2% for Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. (CHD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ECL returned +141. 3% versus CHD's +117. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ECL or CHD?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Church & Dwight Co.

, Inc. (CHD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 14β versus Ecolab Inc. 's 0. 63β — meaning ECL is approximately 349% more volatile than CHD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. (CHD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 55% versus 96% for Ecolab Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ECL or CHD?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ecolab Inc.

(ECL) is pulling ahead at 2. 2% versus 1. 6% for Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. (CHD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. grew EPS 27. 4% year-over-year, compared to -1. 2% for Ecolab Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CHD leads at 4. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ECL or CHD?

Ecolab Inc.

(ECL) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 9% net margin versus 11. 9% for Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ECL leads at 18. 1% versus 17. 4% for CHD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CHD leads at 44. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ECL or CHD more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Church & Dwight Co.

, Inc. (CHD) trades at 24. 9x forward P/E versus 30. 8x for Ecolab Inc. — 5. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ECL: 27. 0% to $327. 11.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ECL or CHD?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. (CHD) offers the highest yield at 1. 3%, versus 1. 0% for Ecolab Inc. (ECL).

09

Is ECL or CHD better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Church & Dwight Co.

, Inc. (CHD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 14), 1. 3% yield, +117. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CHD: +117. 3%, ECL: +141. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ECL and CHD?

These companies operate in different sectors (ECL (Basic Materials) and CHD (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

ECL

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CHD

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ECL and CHD on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ECL: 4.8% · CHD: 0.1%)
Net Margin>
%
(ECL: 12.9% · CHD: 11.8%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(ECL: 35.4x · CHD: 31.0x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.