Chemicals - Specialty
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ECL vs CHD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Household & Personal Products
ECL vs CHD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Household & Personal Products |
| Market Cap | $72.77B | $22.15B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16.08B | $6.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.08B | $733M |
| Gross Margin | 44.5% | 45.1% |
| Operating Margin | 17.7% | 17.3% |
| Forward P/E | 30.8x | 24.9x |
| Total Debt | $9.43B | $2.21B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $646M | $409M |
ECL vs CHD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ecolab Inc. (ECL) | 100 | 121.2 | +21.2% |
| Church & Dwight Co.… (CHD) | 100 | 124.6 | +24.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ECL vs CHD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ECL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 2.2%, EPS growth -1.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.3%
- 141.3% 10Y total return vs CHD's 117.3%
- 2.2% revenue growth vs CHD's 1.6%
CHD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 0.14, yield 1.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.14, Low D/E 55.1%, current ratio 1.07x
- Beta 0.14, yield 1.3%, current ratio 1.07x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.2% revenue growth vs CHD's 1.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (24.9x vs 30.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.9% margin vs CHD's 11.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.14 vs ECL's 0.63, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs ECL's 1.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +2.1% vs ECL's +2.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.8% ROA vs CHD's 8.2%, ROIC 12.7% vs 13.9% |
ECL vs CHD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ECL vs CHD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ECL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ECL is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.1B annually — 2.6x CHD's $6.2B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 12.9% (ECL) to 11.8% (CHD). On growth, ECL holds the edge at +4.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16.1B | $6.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.5B | $1.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.1B | $733M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.9B | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.5% | +45.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.7% | +17.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.9% | +11.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | +17.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.8% | +0.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.3% | +2.2% |
Valuation Metrics
CHD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 31.0x trailing earnings, CHD trades at a 12% valuation discount to ECL's 35.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CHD's 18.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ECL's 22.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $72.8B | $22.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $81.5B | $24.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 35.39x | 30.97x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 30.77x | 24.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.75x | 18.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.52x | 3.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.49x | 5.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 38.21x | 20.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CHD leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ECL delivers a 22.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $17 for CHD. CHD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.55x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ECL's 0.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHD scores 7/9 vs ECL's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +22.0% | +17.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.8% | +8.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.7% | +13.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.8% | +14.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.96x | 0.55x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8.8B | $1.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $646M | $409M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9.4B | $2.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.82x | 15.59x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ECL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ECL five years ago would be worth $11,806 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,219 for CHD. Over the past 12 months, CHD leads with a +2.1% total return vs ECL's +2.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ECL at 15.1% vs CHD's -0.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.6% | +13.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.1% | +2.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.6% | -0.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.1% | +12.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +141.3% | +117.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.1% | -0.2% |
Risk & Volatility
CHD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CHD is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ECL's 0.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CHD currently trades 88.2% from its 52-week high vs ECL's 83.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 0.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $309.27 | $106.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $249.04 | $81.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.3% | +88.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.4 | 41.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
CHD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ECL as "Buy" and CHD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.0% upside for ECL (target: $327) vs 6.5% for CHD (target: $100). For income investors, CHD offers the higher dividend yield at 1.26% vs ECL's 1.03%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $327.11 | $99.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 37 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 23 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.64 | $1.18 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | +4.1% |
CHD leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). ECL leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns).
ECL vs CHD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ECL or CHD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ecolab Inc.
(ECL) is the stronger pick with 2. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 6% for Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. (CHD). Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. (CHD) offers the better valuation at 31. 0x trailing P/E (24. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ecolab Inc. (ECL) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ECL or CHD?
On trailing P/E, Church & Dwight Co.
, Inc. (CHD) is the cheapest at 31. 0x versus Ecolab Inc. at 35. 4x. On forward P/E, Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. is actually cheaper at 24. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ECL or CHD?
Over the past 5 years, Ecolab Inc.
(ECL) delivered a total return of +18. 1%, compared to +12. 2% for Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. (CHD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ECL returned +141. 3% versus CHD's +117. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ECL or CHD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Church & Dwight Co.
, Inc. (CHD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 14β versus Ecolab Inc. 's 0. 63β — meaning ECL is approximately 349% more volatile than CHD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. (CHD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 55% versus 96% for Ecolab Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ECL or CHD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ecolab Inc.
(ECL) is pulling ahead at 2. 2% versus 1. 6% for Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. (CHD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. grew EPS 27. 4% year-over-year, compared to -1. 2% for Ecolab Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CHD leads at 4. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ECL or CHD?
Ecolab Inc.
(ECL) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 9% net margin versus 11. 9% for Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ECL leads at 18. 1% versus 17. 4% for CHD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CHD leads at 44. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ECL or CHD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Church & Dwight Co.
, Inc. (CHD) trades at 24. 9x forward P/E versus 30. 8x for Ecolab Inc. — 5. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ECL: 27. 0% to $327. 11.
08Which pays a better dividend — ECL or CHD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. (CHD) offers the highest yield at 1. 3%, versus 1. 0% for Ecolab Inc. (ECL).
09Is ECL or CHD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Church & Dwight Co.
, Inc. (CHD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 14), 1. 3% yield, +117. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CHD: +117. 3%, ECL: +141. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ECL and CHD?
These companies operate in different sectors (ECL (Basic Materials) and CHD (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.