Chemicals - Specialty
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ECVT vs ASIX vs TROX vs MEOH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals
Chemicals
Chemicals
ECVT vs ASIX vs TROX vs MEOH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals | Chemicals | Chemicals |
| Market Cap | $1.53B | $796M | $1.34B | $4.75B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $819M | $1.52B | $2.92B | $3.59B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-63M | $49M | $-359M | $80M |
| Gross Margin | 22.6% | 10.8% | 5.8% | 25.3% |
| Operating Margin | 15.4% | 4.2% | -4.8% | 12.9% |
| Forward P/E | 22.9x | 15.7x | — | 8.2x |
| Total Debt | $431M | $381M | $3.59B | $3.50B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $197M | $20M | $211M | $428M |
ECVT vs ASIX vs TROX vs MEOH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ecovyst Inc. (ECVT) | 100 | 111.3 | +11.3% |
| AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) | 100 | 202.8 | +102.8% |
| Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) | 100 | 126.7 | +26.7% |
| Methanex Corporation (MEOH) | 100 | 381.0 | +281.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ECVT vs ASIX vs TROX vs MEOH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ECVT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 2.7%, EPS growth -9.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.1%
- 2.7% revenue growth vs TROX's -5.7%
- +102.7% vs ASIX's +8.2%
ASIX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 3.2% margin vs TROX's -12.3%
- 2.9% ROA vs TROX's -7.7%, ROIC 4.4% vs -0.3%
TROX is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 2.37, yield 3.6%, current ratio 2.46x
- 3.6% yield, vs MEOH's 1.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
MEOH is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.39, yield 1.2%
- 135.7% 10Y total return vs TROX's 116.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, current ratio 2.06x
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.7% revenue growth vs TROX's -5.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs TROX's -12.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs TROX's 2.37, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, vs MEOH's 1.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +102.7% vs ASIX's +8.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.9% ROA vs TROX's -7.7%, ROIC 4.4% vs -0.3% |
ECVT vs ASIX vs TROX vs MEOH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ECVT vs ASIX vs TROX vs MEOH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ECVT leads in 1 of 6 categories
ASIX leads 1 • MEOH leads 1 • TROX leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ECVT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MEOH is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.6B annually — 4.4x ECVT's $819M. ASIX is the more profitable business, keeping 3.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TROX's -12.3%. On growth, ECVT holds the edge at +32.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $819M | $1.5B | $2.9B | $3.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $136M | $143M | $166M | $909M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$63M | $49M | -$359M | $80M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $84M | $6M | -$139M | $748M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.6% | +10.8% | +5.8% | +25.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.4% | +4.2% | -4.8% | +12.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.7% | +3.2% | -12.3% | +2.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.2% | +0.4% | -4.8% | +20.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.6% | +9.4% | +3.0% | +2.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.3% | -8.8% | +7.1% | -2.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ASIX and MEOH each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.3x trailing earnings, ASIX trades at a 80% valuation discount to MEOH's 65.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ASIX's 7.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TROX's 16.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $796M | $1.3B | $4.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $1.2B | $4.7B | $7.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -22.90x | 13.34x | -2.83x | 65.30x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.87x | 15.74x | — | 8.21x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 7.10x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.28x | 7.86x | 16.80x | 8.60x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.11x | 0.52x | 0.46x | 1.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.68x | 0.80x | 0.92x | 1.64x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.87x | 124.10x | — | 6.49x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ASIX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ASIX delivers a 6.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-30 for TROX. ASIX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.47x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TROX's 2.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ECVT scores 6/9 vs TROX's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.2% | +6.0% | -30.4% | +2.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.2% | +2.9% | -7.7% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.2% | +4.4% | -0.3% | +6.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.6% | +5.3% | -0.4% | +7.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.71x | 0.47x | 2.48x | 1.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $234M | $361M | $3.4B | $3.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $197M | $20M | $211M | $428M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $431M | $381M | $3.6B | $3.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.08x | 7.92x | -1.16x | 1.93x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MEOH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MEOH five years ago would be worth $16,215 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,493 for TROX. Over the past 12 months, ECVT leads with a +102.7% total return vs ASIX's +8.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MEOH at 12.8% vs ASIX's -9.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +40.9% | +40.3% | +98.1% | +51.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +102.7% | +8.2% | +76.9% | +91.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +32.9% | -25.6% | -23.6% | +43.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.4% | -15.9% | -55.1% | +62.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.9% | +60.6% | +116.1% | +135.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.9% | -9.4% | -8.6% | +12.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ECVT and MEOH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MEOH is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TROX's 2.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ECVT currently trades 93.5% from its 52-week high vs TROX's 79.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 0.81x | 2.37x | 0.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.94 | $26.73 | $10.59 | $66.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.69 | $14.10 | $2.86 | $31.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.5% | +89.8% | +79.4% | +92.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.9 | 60.6 | 58.5 | 54.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.2M | 453K | 3.1M | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TROX and MEOH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ECVT as "Buy", ASIX as "Buy", TROX as "Buy", MEOH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 0.6% upside for MEOH (target: $62) vs -30.8% for ECVT (target: $10). For income investors, TROX offers the higher dividend yield at 3.60% vs MEOH's 1.22%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.67 | $22.00 | $7.25 | $61.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 6 | 17 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.6% | +3.6% | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.63 | $0.30 | $0.75 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.1% | +0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ECVT leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). ASIX leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
ECVT vs ASIX vs TROX vs MEOH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ECVT or ASIX or TROX or MEOH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ecovyst Inc.
(ECVT) is the stronger pick with 2. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 7% for Tronox Holdings plc (TROX). AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) offers the better valuation at 13. 3x trailing P/E (15. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ecovyst Inc. (ECVT) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ECVT or ASIX or TROX or MEOH?
On trailing P/E, AdvanSix Inc.
(ASIX) is the cheapest at 13. 3x versus Methanex Corporation at 65. 3x. On forward P/E, Methanex Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ECVT or ASIX or TROX or MEOH?
Over the past 5 years, Methanex Corporation (MEOH) delivered a total return of +62.
2%, compared to -55. 1% for Tronox Holdings plc (TROX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MEOH returned +135. 7% versus ECVT's +9. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ECVT or ASIX or TROX or MEOH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Methanex Corporation (MEOH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
39β versus Tronox Holdings plc's 2. 37β — meaning TROX is approximately 506% more volatile than MEOH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 47% versus 2% for Tronox Holdings plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ECVT or ASIX or TROX or MEOH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ecovyst Inc.
(ECVT) is pulling ahead at 2. 7% versus -5. 7% for Tronox Holdings plc (TROX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AdvanSix Inc. grew EPS 11. 1% year-over-year, compared to -916. 7% for Ecovyst Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ECVT leads at -4. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ECVT or ASIX or TROX or MEOH?
AdvanSix Inc.
(ASIX) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 2% net margin versus -16. 2% for Tronox Holdings plc — meaning it keeps 3. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MEOH leads at 12. 9% versus -0. 7% for TROX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MEOH leads at 25. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ECVT or ASIX or TROX or MEOH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Methanex Corporation (MEOH) trades at 8.
2x forward P/E versus 22. 9x for Ecovyst Inc. — 14. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MEOH: 0. 6% to $61. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — ECVT or ASIX or TROX or MEOH?
In this comparison, TROX (3.
6% yield), ASIX (2. 6% yield), MEOH (1. 2% yield) pay a dividend. ECVT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ECVT or ASIX or TROX or MEOH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Methanex Corporation (MEOH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
39), 1. 2% yield, +135. 7% 10Y return). Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) carries a higher beta of 2. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MEOH: +135. 7%, TROX: +116. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ECVT and ASIX and TROX and MEOH?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ECVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ASIX is a small-cap deep-value stock; TROX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MEOH is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ASIX, TROX, MEOH pay a dividend while ECVT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.