Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

EFC vs MFA vs EARN vs MITT vs IVR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
EFC
Ellington Financial Inc.

REIT - Mortgage

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.35B
5Y Perf.+33.2%
MFA
MFA Financial, Inc.

REIT - Mortgage

NYSE • US
Market Cap$995M
5Y Perf.+44.2%
EARN
Ellington Credit Company

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$183M
5Y Perf.-48.6%
MITT
TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc

REIT - Mortgage

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$249M
5Y Perf.+6.2%
IVR
Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc.

REIT - Mortgage

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$577M
5Y Perf.-69.5%

EFC vs MFA vs EARN vs MITT vs IVR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
EFC logoEFC
MFA logoMFA
EARN logoEARN
MITT logoMITT
IVR logoIVR
IndustryREIT - MortgageREIT - MortgageAsset ManagementREIT - MortgageREIT - Mortgage
Market Cap$1.35B$995M$183M$249M$577M
Revenue (TTM)$429M$650M$51M$493M$335M
Net Income (TTM)$147M$135M$-5M$34M$101M
Gross Margin88.6%59.3%31.3%94.2%50.5%
Operating Margin63.0%41.0%14.0%93.3%47.1%
Forward P/E7.5x7.1x4.6x7.2x3.7x
Total Debt$16.96B$10.99B$563M$8.10B$5.62B
Cash & Equiv.$202M$213M$32M$76M$56M

EFC vs MFA vs EARN vs MITT vs IVRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

EFC
MFA
EARN
MITT
IVR
StockMay 20May 26Return
Ellington Financial… (EFC)100133.2+33.2%
MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA)100144.2+44.2%
Ellington Credit Co… (EARN)10051.4-48.6%
TPG Mortgage Invest… (MITT)100106.2+6.2%
Invesco Mortgage Ca… (IVR)10030.5-69.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: EFC vs MFA vs EARN vs MITT vs IVR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: IVR leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. Ellington Financial Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. MFA also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
EFC
Ellington Financial Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

EFC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 139.0%, EPS growth -12.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 150.0%
  • 77.3% 10Y total return vs MFA's 7.8%
  • 34.2% margin vs MITT's 6.8%
  • Beta 0.47 vs MITT's 0.90, lower leverage
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
MFA
MFA Financial, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

MFA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.77, yield 18.4%
  • Beta 0.77, yield 18.4%, current ratio 2.18x
  • 213.0% FFO/revenue growth vs IVR's -24.6%
  • 18.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs IVR's 20.1%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
EARN
Ellington Credit Company
The Banking Pick

EARN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.63, current ratio 0.13x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
MITT
TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc
The REIT Holding

Among these 5 stocks, MITT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: real estate exposure
IVR
Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

IVR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and momentum.

  • Lower P/E (3.7x vs 7.2x)
  • +29.9% vs EARN's +8.0%
  • 1.7% ROA vs EARN's -0.6%, ROIC 4.0% vs 0.7%
Best for: value and momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMFA logoMFA213.0% FFO/revenue growth vs IVR's -24.6%
ValueIVR logoIVRLower P/E (3.7x vs 7.2x)
Quality / MarginsEFC logoEFC34.2% margin vs MITT's 6.8%
Stability / SafetyEFC logoEFCBeta 0.47 vs MITT's 0.90, lower leverage
DividendsMFA logoMFA18.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs IVR's 20.1%
Momentum (1Y)IVR logoIVR+29.9% vs EARN's +8.0%
Efficiency (ROA)IVR logoIVR1.7% ROA vs EARN's -0.6%, ROIC 4.0% vs 0.7%

EFC vs MFA vs EARN vs MITT vs IVR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

EFCEllington Financial Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

MFAMFA Financial, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

EARNEllington Credit Company

Segment breakdown not available.

MITTTPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc
FY 2018
Single Family Rental Properties Segment
100.0%$4M
Corporate Segment
0.0%$0
Securities And Loans Segment
0.0%$0
IVRInvesco Mortgage Capital Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

EFC vs MFA vs EARN vs MITT vs IVR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLEFCLAGGINGIVR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — EFC and MITT and IVR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

MFA is the larger business by revenue, generating $650M annually — 12.8x EARN's $51M. EFC is the more profitable business, keeping 34.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MITT's 6.8%. On growth, EFC holds the edge at +123.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricEFC logoEFCEllington Financi…MFA logoMFAMFA Financial, In…EARN logoEARNEllington Credit …MITT logoMITTTPG Mortgage Inve…IVR logoIVRInvesco Mortgage …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$429M$650M$51M$493M$335M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$301M$268M-$5M$457M$158M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$147M$135M-$5M$34M$101M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$925M$91M$20M$68M$157M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+88.6%+59.3%+31.3%+94.2%+50.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+63.0%+41.0%+14.0%+93.3%+47.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+34.2%+20.7%+13.0%+6.8%+30.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-2.2%+14.0%+18.0%+13.8%+46.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+123.0%+118.9%+20.9%-58.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-44.0%-103.0%-2.1%-2.3%+9.7%
Evenly matched — EFC and MITT and IVR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — MITT and IVR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 5.2x trailing earnings, IVR trades at a 74% valuation discount to EARN's 20.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MFA's 17.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EARN's 100.6x.

MetricEFC logoEFCEllington Financi…MFA logoMFAMFA Financial, In…EARN logoEARNEllington Credit …MITT logoMITTTPG Mortgage Inve…IVR logoIVRInvesco Mortgage …
Market CapShares × price$1.4B$995M$183M$249M$577M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$18.1B$11.8B$714M$8.3B$6.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS11.42x5.80x20.29x8.71x5.25x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.7.47x7.11x4.62x7.20x3.67x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.46x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple39.45x17.07x100.63x18.25x19.12x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.00x1.14x3.61x0.53x1.70x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.72x0.56x0.68x0.43x0.67x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF2.66x13.06x20.07x4.18x3.67x
Evenly matched — MITT and IVR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

EARN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

IVR delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-3 for EARN. EARN carries lower financial leverage with a 2.91x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MITT's 14.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EARN scores 8/9 vs MITT's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricEFC logoEFCEllington Financi…MFA logoMFAMFA Financial, In…EARN logoEARNEllington Credit …MITT logoMITTTPG Mortgage Inve…IVR logoIVRInvesco Mortgage …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+8.4%+7.4%-2.8%+6.1%+13.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.8%+1.1%-0.6%+0.4%+1.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+3.1%+4.4%+0.7%+4.5%+4.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.7%+5.8%+3.7%+6.5%+40.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965835
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage9.07x6.01x2.91x14.45x7.05x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$16.8B$10.8B$531M$8.0B$5.6B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$202M$213M$32M$76M$56M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$17.0B$11.0B$563M$8.1B$5.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.51x1.34x-0.16x1.12x1.46x
EARN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — EFC and MITT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in EFC five years ago would be worth $12,153 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,499 for IVR. Over the past 12 months, IVR leads with a +29.9% total return vs EARN's +8.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MITT at 23.4% vs EARN's 3.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricEFC logoEFCEllington Financi…MFA logoMFAMFA Financial, In…EARN logoEARNEllington Credit …MITT logoMITTTPG Mortgage Inve…IVR logoIVRInvesco Mortgage …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+3.1%+6.1%-2.1%-5.6%+0.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+18.5%+19.2%+8.0%+29.0%+29.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+51.9%+34.1%+11.7%+87.9%+30.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+21.5%-0.6%-17.4%-3.5%-45.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+77.3%+7.8%+31.3%-16.9%-31.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+15.0%+10.3%+3.7%+23.4%+9.4%
Evenly matched — EFC and MITT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

EFC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

EFC is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MITT's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EFC currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs EARN's 80.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricEFC logoEFCEllington Financi…MFA logoMFAMFA Financial, In…EARN logoEARNEllington Credit …MITT logoMITTTPG Mortgage Inve…IVR logoIVRInvesco Mortgage …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.47x0.77x0.63x0.90x0.78x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$14.12$10.57$6.08$9.27$9.50
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$11.28$8.78$4.27$6.52$7.10
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+96.2%+92.2%+80.1%+84.6%+84.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10069.743.861.450.543.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.6M1.4M483K277K2.2M
EFC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — MFA and MITT and IVR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: EFC as "Buy", MFA as "Hold", EARN as "Hold", MITT as "Buy", IVR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 23.2% upside for EARN (target: $6) vs -0.7% for EFC (target: $14). For income investors, IVR offers the higher dividend yield at 20.08% vs MITT's 10.04%.

MetricEFC logoEFCEllington Financi…MFA logoMFAMFA Financial, In…EARN logoEARNEllington Credit …MITT logoMITTTPG Mortgage Inve…IVR logoIVRInvesco Mortgage …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$13.50$10.25$6.00$9.63$9.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts132271820
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+13.6%+18.4%+16.8%+10.0%+20.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01010
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.85$1.79$0.82$0.79$1.61
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.5%0.0%0.0%+1.5%
Evenly matched — MFA and MITT and IVR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

EARN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). EFC leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 4 tied.

Best OverallEllington Financial Inc. (EFC)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

EFC vs MFA vs EARN vs MITT vs IVR: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is EFC or MFA or EARN or MITT or IVR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, MFA Financial, Inc.

(MFA) is the stronger pick with 213. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 6% for Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. (IVR). Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. (IVR) offers the better valuation at 5. 2x trailing P/E (3. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — EFC or MFA or EARN or MITT or IVR?

On trailing P/E, Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc.

(IVR) is the cheapest at 5. 2x versus Ellington Credit Company at 20. 3x. On forward P/E, Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. is actually cheaper at 3. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — EFC or MFA or EARN or MITT or IVR?

Over the past 5 years, Ellington Financial Inc.

(EFC) delivered a total return of +21. 5%, compared to -45. 0% for Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. (IVR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EFC returned +77. 3% versus IVR's -31. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — EFC or MFA or EARN or MITT or IVR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ellington Financial Inc.

(EFC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc's 0. 90β — meaning MITT is approximately 92% more volatile than EFC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ellington Credit Company (EARN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 14% for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — EFC or MFA or EARN or MITT or IVR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), MFA Financial, Inc.

(MFA) is pulling ahead at 213. 0% versus -24. 6% for Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. (IVR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. grew EPS 135. 4% year-over-year, compared to -26. 8% for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc. Over a 3-year CAGR, EFC leads at 150. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — EFC or MFA or EARN or MITT or IVR?

Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc.

(IVR) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 8% net margin versus 10. 3% for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc — meaning it keeps 29. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MITT leads at 96. 9% versus 14. 0% for EARN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IVR leads at 96. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is EFC or MFA or EARN or MITT or IVR more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc.

(IVR) trades at 3. 7x forward P/E versus 7. 5x for Ellington Financial Inc. — 3. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EARN: 23. 2% to $6. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — EFC or MFA or EARN or MITT or IVR?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. (IVR) offers the highest yield at 20. 1%, versus 10. 0% for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc (MITT).

09

Is EFC or MFA or EARN or MITT or IVR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Ellington Financial Inc.

(EFC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 47), 13. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EFC: +77. 3%, MITT: -16. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between EFC and MFA and EARN and MITT and IVR?

These companies operate in different sectors (EFC (Real Estate) and MFA (Unknown) and EARN (Financial Services) and MITT (Real Estate) and IVR (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: EFC is a small-cap high-growth stock; MFA is a small-cap high-growth stock; EARN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MITT is a small-cap deep-value stock; IVR is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

EFC

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 61%
  • Net Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MFA

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 59%
  • Net Margin > 12%
  • Dividend Yield > 7.3%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EARN

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 6.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MITT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IVR

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 18%
  • Dividend Yield > 8.0%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform EFC and MFA and EARN and MITT and IVR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(EFC: 123.0% · MFA: 118.9%)
Net Margin>
%
(EFC: 34.2% · MFA: 20.7%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(EFC: 11.4x · MFA: 5.8x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.