REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
EFC vs MFA vs EARN vs MITT vs IVR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
Asset Management
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
EFC vs MFA vs EARN vs MITT vs IVR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | Asset Management | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $1.35B | $995M | $183M | $249M | $577M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $429M | $650M | $51M | $493M | $335M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $147M | $135M | $-5M | $34M | $101M |
| Gross Margin | 88.6% | 59.3% | 31.3% | 94.2% | 50.5% |
| Operating Margin | 63.0% | 41.0% | 14.0% | 93.3% | 47.1% |
| Forward P/E | 7.5x | 7.1x | 4.6x | 7.2x | 3.7x |
| Total Debt | $16.96B | $10.99B | $563M | $8.10B | $5.62B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $202M | $213M | $32M | $76M | $56M |
EFC vs MFA vs EARN vs MITT vs IVR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ellington Financial… (EFC) | 100 | 133.2 | +33.2% |
| MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) | 100 | 144.2 | +44.2% |
| Ellington Credit Co… (EARN) | 100 | 51.4 | -48.6% |
| TPG Mortgage Invest… (MITT) | 100 | 106.2 | +6.2% |
| Invesco Mortgage Ca… (IVR) | 100 | 30.5 | -69.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EFC vs MFA vs EARN vs MITT vs IVR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EFC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 139.0%, EPS growth -12.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 150.0%
- 77.3% 10Y total return vs MFA's 7.8%
- 34.2% margin vs MITT's 6.8%
- Beta 0.47 vs MITT's 0.90, lower leverage
MFA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.77, yield 18.4%
- Beta 0.77, yield 18.4%, current ratio 2.18x
- 213.0% FFO/revenue growth vs IVR's -24.6%
- 18.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs IVR's 20.1%
EARN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.63, current ratio 0.13x
Among these 5 stocks, MITT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
IVR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and momentum.
- Lower P/E (3.7x vs 7.2x)
- +29.9% vs EARN's +8.0%
- 1.7% ROA vs EARN's -0.6%, ROIC 4.0% vs 0.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 213.0% FFO/revenue growth vs IVR's -24.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.7x vs 7.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.2% margin vs MITT's 6.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs MITT's 0.90, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 18.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs IVR's 20.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.9% vs EARN's +8.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.7% ROA vs EARN's -0.6%, ROIC 4.0% vs 0.7% |
EFC vs MFA vs EARN vs MITT vs IVR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
EFC vs MFA vs EARN vs MITT vs IVR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EARN leads in 1 of 6 categories
EFC leads 1 • MFA leads 0 • MITT leads 0 • IVR leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — EFC and MITT and IVR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MFA is the larger business by revenue, generating $650M annually — 12.8x EARN's $51M. EFC is the more profitable business, keeping 34.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MITT's 6.8%. On growth, EFC holds the edge at +123.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $429M | $650M | $51M | $493M | $335M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $301M | $268M | -$5M | $457M | $158M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $147M | $135M | -$5M | $34M | $101M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$925M | $91M | $20M | $68M | $157M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +88.6% | +59.3% | +31.3% | +94.2% | +50.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +63.0% | +41.0% | +14.0% | +93.3% | +47.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +34.2% | +20.7% | +13.0% | +6.8% | +30.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | +14.0% | +18.0% | +13.8% | +46.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +123.0% | +118.9% | — | +20.9% | -58.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -44.0% | -103.0% | -2.1% | -2.3% | +9.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MITT and IVR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.2x trailing earnings, IVR trades at a 74% valuation discount to EARN's 20.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MFA's 17.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EARN's 100.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $995M | $183M | $249M | $577M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18.1B | $11.8B | $714M | $8.3B | $6.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.42x | 5.80x | 20.29x | 8.71x | 5.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.47x | 7.11x | 4.62x | 7.20x | 3.67x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.46x | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 39.45x | 17.07x | 100.63x | 18.25x | 19.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.00x | 1.14x | 3.61x | 0.53x | 1.70x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.72x | 0.56x | 0.68x | 0.43x | 0.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.66x | 13.06x | 20.07x | 4.18x | 3.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EARN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IVR delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-3 for EARN. EARN carries lower financial leverage with a 2.91x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MITT's 14.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EARN scores 8/9 vs MITT's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.4% | +7.4% | -2.8% | +6.1% | +13.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +1.1% | -0.6% | +0.4% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.1% | +4.4% | +0.7% | +4.5% | +4.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.7% | +5.8% | +3.7% | +6.5% | +40.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 9.07x | 6.01x | 2.91x | 14.45x | 7.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $16.8B | $10.8B | $531M | $8.0B | $5.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $202M | $213M | $32M | $76M | $56M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $17.0B | $11.0B | $563M | $8.1B | $5.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.51x | 1.34x | -0.16x | 1.12x | 1.46x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — EFC and MITT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EFC five years ago would be worth $12,153 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,499 for IVR. Over the past 12 months, IVR leads with a +29.9% total return vs EARN's +8.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MITT at 23.4% vs EARN's 3.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.1% | +6.1% | -2.1% | -5.6% | +0.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.5% | +19.2% | +8.0% | +29.0% | +29.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +51.9% | +34.1% | +11.7% | +87.9% | +30.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.5% | -0.6% | -17.4% | -3.5% | -45.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +77.3% | +7.8% | +31.3% | -16.9% | -31.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.0% | +10.3% | +3.7% | +23.4% | +9.4% |
Risk & Volatility
EFC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EFC is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MITT's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EFC currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs EARN's 80.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.47x | 0.77x | 0.63x | 0.90x | 0.78x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.12 | $10.57 | $6.08 | $9.27 | $9.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.28 | $8.78 | $4.27 | $6.52 | $7.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.2% | +92.2% | +80.1% | +84.6% | +84.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.7 | 43.8 | 61.4 | 50.5 | 43.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 1.4M | 483K | 277K | 2.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MFA and MITT and IVR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EFC as "Buy", MFA as "Hold", EARN as "Hold", MITT as "Buy", IVR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 23.2% upside for EARN (target: $6) vs -0.7% for EFC (target: $14). For income investors, IVR offers the higher dividend yield at 20.08% vs MITT's 10.04%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.50 | $10.25 | $6.00 | $9.63 | $9.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 22 | 7 | 18 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +13.6% | +18.4% | +16.8% | +10.0% | +20.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.85 | $1.79 | $0.82 | $0.79 | $1.61 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.5% |
EARN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). EFC leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 4 tied.
EFC vs MFA vs EARN vs MITT vs IVR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EFC or MFA or EARN or MITT or IVR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MFA Financial, Inc.
(MFA) is the stronger pick with 213. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 6% for Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. (IVR). Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. (IVR) offers the better valuation at 5. 2x trailing P/E (3. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EFC or MFA or EARN or MITT or IVR?
On trailing P/E, Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc.
(IVR) is the cheapest at 5. 2x versus Ellington Credit Company at 20. 3x. On forward P/E, Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. is actually cheaper at 3. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EFC or MFA or EARN or MITT or IVR?
Over the past 5 years, Ellington Financial Inc.
(EFC) delivered a total return of +21. 5%, compared to -45. 0% for Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. (IVR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EFC returned +77. 3% versus IVR's -31. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EFC or MFA or EARN or MITT or IVR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ellington Financial Inc.
(EFC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc's 0. 90β — meaning MITT is approximately 92% more volatile than EFC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ellington Credit Company (EARN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 14% for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EFC or MFA or EARN or MITT or IVR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MFA Financial, Inc.
(MFA) is pulling ahead at 213. 0% versus -24. 6% for Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. (IVR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. grew EPS 135. 4% year-over-year, compared to -26. 8% for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc. Over a 3-year CAGR, EFC leads at 150. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EFC or MFA or EARN or MITT or IVR?
Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc.
(IVR) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 8% net margin versus 10. 3% for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc — meaning it keeps 29. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MITT leads at 96. 9% versus 14. 0% for EARN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IVR leads at 96. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EFC or MFA or EARN or MITT or IVR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc.
(IVR) trades at 3. 7x forward P/E versus 7. 5x for Ellington Financial Inc. — 3. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EARN: 23. 2% to $6. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — EFC or MFA or EARN or MITT or IVR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. (IVR) offers the highest yield at 20. 1%, versus 10. 0% for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc (MITT).
09Is EFC or MFA or EARN or MITT or IVR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ellington Financial Inc.
(EFC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 47), 13. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EFC: +77. 3%, MITT: -16. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EFC and MFA and EARN and MITT and IVR?
These companies operate in different sectors (EFC (Real Estate) and MFA (Unknown) and EARN (Financial Services) and MITT (Real Estate) and IVR (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: EFC is a small-cap high-growth stock; MFA is a small-cap high-growth stock; EARN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MITT is a small-cap deep-value stock; IVR is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.