Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
EFXT vs GE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
EFXT vs GE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $3.46B | $316.20B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.35B | $48.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $111M | $8.66B |
| Gross Margin | 21.9% | 34.8% |
| Operating Margin | 12.2% | 18.5% |
| Forward P/E | 14.6x | 40.0x |
| Total Debt | $702M | $20.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $81M | $12.39B |
EFXT vs GE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enerflex Ltd. (EFXT) | 100 | 701.0 | +601.0% |
| GE Aerospace (GE) | 100 | 925.2 | +825.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EFXT vs GE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EFXT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.97, yield 0.5%
- 299.5% 10Y total return vs GE's 121.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.97, Low D/E 64.4%, current ratio 1.13x
GE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.5%, EPS growth 36.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.3%
- 18.5% revenue growth vs EFXT's 8.3%
- 17.9% margin vs EFXT's 3.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.5% revenue growth vs EFXT's 8.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.6x vs 40.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.9% margin vs EFXT's 3.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.97 vs GE's 1.14, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs GE's 0.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +318.6% vs GE's +44.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.8% ROA vs EFXT's 3.6%, ROIC 24.7% vs 13.7% |
EFXT vs GE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EFXT vs GE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GE is the larger business by revenue, generating $48.4B annually — 14.4x EFXT's $3.4B. GE is the more profitable business, keeping 17.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EFXT's 3.3%. On growth, GE holds the edge at +24.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.4B | $48.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $456M | $9.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $111M | $8.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $259M | $7.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.9% | +34.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | +18.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | +17.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | +15.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.9% | +24.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.0% | -1.1% |
Valuation Metrics
EFXT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 37.1x trailing earnings, GE trades at a 31% valuation discount to EFXT's 53.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EFXT's 16.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GE's 32.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.5B | $316.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.1B | $324.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 53.57x | 37.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.58x | 40.02x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.14x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.38x | 32.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.32x | 6.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.20x | 17.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.79x | 43.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EFXT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GE delivers a 45.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $9 for EFXT. EFXT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.64x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GE's 1.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EFXT scores 8/9 vs GE's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.0% | +45.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.6% | +6.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.7% | +24.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.1% | +9.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.64x | 1.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $621M | $8.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $81M | $12.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $702M | $20.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.52x | 11.69x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EFXT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EFXT five years ago would be worth $47,084 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $46,249 for GE. Over the past 12 months, EFXT leads with a +318.6% total return vs GE's +44.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EFXT at 64.9% vs GE's 56.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +78.3% | -5.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +318.6% | +44.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +348.6% | +280.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +370.8% | +362.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +299.5% | +121.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +64.9% | +56.0% |
Risk & Volatility
EFXT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EFXT is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GE's 1.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EFXT currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs GE's 86.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.97x | 1.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.53 | $348.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.46 | $208.22 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.5% | +86.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.2 | 56.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 437K | 5.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — EFXT and GE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates EFXT as "Buy" and GE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.6% upside for GE (target: $386) vs -19.9% for EFXT (target: $23). For income investors, EFXT offers the higher dividend yield at 0.49% vs GE's 0.45%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.75 | $386.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.5% | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.14 | $1.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | +2.4% |
EFXT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). GE leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
EFXT vs GE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EFXT or GE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, GE Aerospace (GE) is the stronger pick with 18.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 3% for Enerflex Ltd. (EFXT). GE Aerospace (GE) offers the better valuation at 37. 1x trailing P/E (40. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Enerflex Ltd. (EFXT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EFXT or GE?
On trailing P/E, GE Aerospace (GE) is the cheapest at 37.
1x versus Enerflex Ltd. at 53. 6x. On forward P/E, Enerflex Ltd. is actually cheaper at 14. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EFXT or GE?
Over the past 5 years, Enerflex Ltd.
(EFXT) delivered a total return of +370. 8%, compared to +362. 5% for GE Aerospace (GE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EFXT returned +299. 5% versus GE's +121. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EFXT or GE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Enerflex Ltd.
(EFXT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 97β versus GE Aerospace's 1. 14β — meaning GE is approximately 17% more volatile than EFXT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Enerflex Ltd. (EFXT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 64% versus 108% for GE Aerospace — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EFXT or GE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), GE Aerospace (GE) is pulling ahead at 18.
5% versus 8. 3% for Enerflex Ltd. (EFXT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Enerflex Ltd. grew EPS 103. 8% year-over-year, compared to 36. 2% for GE Aerospace. Over a 3-year CAGR, GE leads at 16. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EFXT or GE?
GE Aerospace (GE) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
0% net margin versus 2. 5% for Enerflex Ltd. — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GE leads at 19. 1% versus 12. 1% for EFXT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GE leads at 36. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EFXT or GE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Enerflex Ltd.
(EFXT) trades at 14. 6x forward P/E versus 40. 0x for GE Aerospace — 25. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GE: 27. 6% to $386. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — EFXT or GE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Enerflex Ltd. (EFXT) offers the highest yield at 0. 5%, versus 0. 4% for GE Aerospace (GE).
09Is EFXT or GE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Enerflex Ltd.
(EFXT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 97), +299. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EFXT: +299. 5%, GE: +121. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EFXT and GE?
These companies operate in different sectors (EFXT (Energy) and GE (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: EFXT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GE is a large-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.