Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
EGBN vs FUNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
EGBN vs FUNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $808M | $244M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $634M | $112M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-128M | $25M |
| Gross Margin | 3.2% | 68.8% |
| Operating Margin | -26.9% | 24.4% |
| Forward P/E | 15.9x | 8.5x |
| Total Debt | $147M | $188M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $78M |
EGBN vs FUNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eagle Bancorp, Inc. (EGBN) | 100 | 81.9 | -18.1% |
| First United Corpor… (FUNC) | 100 | 272.6 | +172.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EGBN vs FUNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EGBN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.21, Low D/E 12.9%, current ratio 0.33x
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FUNC's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
- +46.2% vs FUNC's +27.7%
FUNC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.72, yield 2.2%
- Rev growth 16.9%, EPS growth 40.0%
- 283.2% 10Y total return vs EGBN's -30.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.9% NII/revenue growth vs EGBN's -10.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.5x vs 15.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FUNC's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.72 vs EGBN's 1.21 | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs EGBN's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.2% vs FUNC's +27.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FUNC's 0.4% |
EGBN vs FUNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
EGBN vs FUNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FUNC leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EGBN is the larger business by revenue, generating $634M annually — 5.7x FUNC's $112M. FUNC is the more profitable business, keeping 18.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EGBN's -20.2%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $634M | $112M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$168M | $36M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$128M | $25M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | $16M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +3.2% | +68.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -26.9% | +24.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -20.2% | +18.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | +18.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -50.0% | +20.2% |
Valuation Metrics
EGBN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $808M | $244M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $944M | $353M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.30x | 11.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.91x | 8.53x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.06x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.27x | 2.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.70x | 1.37x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 38.94x | 11.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FUNC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FUNC delivers a 12.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-11 for EGBN. EGBN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUNC's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FUNC scores 6/9 vs EGBN's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.9% | +12.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.2% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.2% | +5.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.9% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 1.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $135M | $109M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $78M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $147M | $188M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.51x | 1.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FUNC five years ago would be worth $22,977 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,967 for EGBN. Over the past 12 months, EGBN leads with a +46.2% total return vs FUNC's +27.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUNC at 46.3% vs EGBN's 14.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.2% | +2.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.2% | +27.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.7% | +213.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.3% | +129.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.8% | +283.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.1% | +46.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EGBN and FUNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FUNC is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EGBN's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.21x | 0.72x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.26 | $41.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.03 | $28.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.6% | +89.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.4 | 49.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 282K | 11K |
Analyst Outlook
FUNC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates EGBN as "Hold" and FUNC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.1% upside for EGBN (target: $29) vs -33.4% for FUNC (target: $25). For income investors, FUNC offers the higher dividend yield at 2.19% vs EGBN's 1.91%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.67 | $25.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.51 | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.7% |
FUNC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). EGBN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
EGBN vs FUNC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EGBN or FUNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger pick with 16.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 4% for Eagle Bancorp, Inc. (EGBN). First United Corporation (FUNC) offers the better valuation at 11. 9x trailing P/E (8. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First United Corporation (FUNC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EGBN or FUNC?
On forward P/E, First United Corporation is actually cheaper at 8.
5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EGBN or FUNC?
Over the past 5 years, First United Corporation (FUNC) delivered a total return of +129.
8%, compared to -40. 3% for Eagle Bancorp, Inc. (EGBN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUNC returned +283. 2% versus EGBN's -30. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EGBN or FUNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First United Corporation (FUNC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
72β versus Eagle Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 21β — meaning EGBN is approximately 70% more volatile than FUNC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Eagle Bancorp, Inc. (EGBN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 105% for First United Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EGBN or FUNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First United Corporation (FUNC) is pulling ahead at 16.
9% versus -10. 4% for Eagle Bancorp, Inc. (EGBN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First United Corporation grew EPS 40. 0% year-over-year, compared to -169. 9% for Eagle Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EGBN or FUNC?
First United Corporation (FUNC) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
4% net margin versus -20. 2% for Eagle Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FUNC leads at 24. 4% versus -26. 9% for EGBN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUNC leads at 68. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EGBN or FUNC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, First United Corporation (FUNC) trades at 8.
5x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for Eagle Bancorp, Inc. — 7. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EGBN: 8. 1% to $28. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — EGBN or FUNC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
First United Corporation (FUNC) offers the highest yield at 2. 2%, versus 1. 9% for Eagle Bancorp, Inc. (EGBN).
09Is EGBN or FUNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
72), 2. 2% yield, +283. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FUNC: +283. 2%, EGBN: -30. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EGBN and FUNC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: EGBN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FUNC is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.