Medical - Care Facilities
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
EHAB vs UNH vs CVS vs ELV vs HUM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Healthcare Plans
Medical - Healthcare Plans
Medical - Healthcare Plans
Medical - Healthcare Plans
EHAB vs UNH vs CVS vs ELV vs HUM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Healthcare Plans | Medical - Healthcare Plans | Medical - Healthcare Plans | Medical - Healthcare Plans |
| Market Cap | $706M | $335.60B | $111.40B | $80.98B | $29.67B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.06B | $449.71B | $407.90B | $200.41B | $137.20B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $12.04B | $2.93B | $5.24B | $1.13B |
| Gross Margin | 34.5% | 18.8% | 13.9% | 23.2% | 14.0% |
| Operating Margin | 7.2% | 4.2% | 1.5% | 3.8% | 1.0% |
| Forward P/E | 22.8x | 20.2x | 12.2x | 13.9x | 27.7x |
| Total Debt | $500M | $78.39B | $93.59B | $33.23B | $12.94B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $44M | $24.36B | $8.51B | $9.49B | $4.20B |
EHAB vs UNH vs CVS vs ELV vs HUM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enhabit, Inc. (EHAB) | 100 | 60.0 | -40.0% |
| UnitedHealth Group … (UNH) | 100 | 72.0 | -28.0% |
| CVS Health Corporat… (CVS) | 100 | 89.9 | -10.1% |
| Elevance Health Inc. (ELV) | 100 | 78.0 | -22.0% |
| Humana Inc. (HUM) | 100 | 50.5 | -49.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EHAB vs UNH vs CVS vs ELV vs HUM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EHAB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.44, Low D/E 88.6%, current ratio 1.63x
- +68.0% vs ELV's -9.0%
UNH is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 220.6% 10Y total return vs ELV's 202.1%
- 2.7% margin vs EHAB's -0.3%
CVS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.05, yield 3.1%
- Beta 0.05, yield 3.1%, current ratio 0.84x
- Lower P/E (12.2x vs 27.7x)
- Beta 0.05 vs UNH's 0.59
ELV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 12.6%, EPS growth -2.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.3%
- 12.6% revenue growth vs EHAB's 2.4%
- 4.3% ROA vs EHAB's -0.3%, ROIC 9.1% vs 4.5%
Among these 5 stocks, HUM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.6% revenue growth vs EHAB's 2.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.2x vs 27.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.7% margin vs EHAB's -0.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs UNH's 0.59 | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield, vs UNH's 2.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +68.0% vs ELV's -9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.3% ROA vs EHAB's -0.3%, ROIC 9.1% vs 4.5% |
EHAB vs UNH vs CVS vs ELV vs HUM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EHAB vs UNH vs CVS vs ELV vs HUM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EHAB leads in 2 of 6 categories
CVS leads 2 • ELV leads 1 • UNH leads 0 • HUM leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EHAB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UNH is the larger business by revenue, generating $449.7B annually — 422.3x EHAB's $1.1B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 2.7% (UNH) to -0.3% (EHAB). On growth, HUM holds the edge at +23.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $449.7B | $407.9B | $200.4B | $137.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $98M | $23.2B | $10.5B | $8.9B | $2.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | $12.0B | $2.9B | $5.2B | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $81M | $19.7B | $7.4B | $6.5B | $1.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.5% | +18.8% | +13.9% | +23.2% | +14.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.2% | +4.2% | +1.5% | +3.8% | +1.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.3% | +2.7% | +0.7% | +2.6% | +0.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | +4.4% | +1.8% | +3.2% | +0.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.9% | +2.0% | +6.2% | +2.6% | +23.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.9% | +0.7% | +63.1% | -16.8% | -4.6% |
Valuation Metrics
EHAB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.8x trailing earnings, ELV trades at a 76% valuation discount to CVS's 62.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ELV's 10.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HUM's 16.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $706M | $335.6B | $111.4B | $81.0B | $29.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $389.6B | $196.5B | $104.7B | $38.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -152.10x | 27.95x | 62.81x | 14.84x | 25.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.84x | 20.19x | 12.19x | 13.93x | 27.68x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 2.15x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.47x | 16.70x | 13.11x | 10.84x | 16.87x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.67x | 0.75x | 0.28x | 0.41x | 0.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.24x | 3.31x | 1.47x | 1.88x | 1.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.73x | 20.88x | 14.27x | 25.51x | 79.13x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ELV leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ELV delivers a 11.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-1 for EHAB. HUM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.73x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CVS's 1.24x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EHAB scores 6/9 vs HUM's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.6% | +11.5% | +3.9% | +11.9% | +6.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.3% | +3.9% | +1.1% | +4.3% | +2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.5% | +9.2% | +5.0% | +9.1% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.0% | +9.7% | +6.1% | +8.2% | +4.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.89x | 0.77x | 1.24x | 0.75x | 0.73x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $456M | $54.0B | $85.1B | $23.7B | $8.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $44M | $24.4B | $8.5B | $9.5B | $4.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $500M | $78.4B | $93.6B | $33.2B | $12.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.83x | 4.71x | 2.11x | 5.39x | 3.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CVS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CVS five years ago would be worth $11,700 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,512 for EHAB. Over the past 12 months, EHAB leads with a +68.0% total return vs ELV's -9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CVS at 11.0% vs HUM's -21.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +51.6% | +10.6% | +10.6% | +5.8% | -6.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +68.0% | -3.2% | +34.7% | -9.0% | -1.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.1% | -19.9% | +36.6% | -15.6% | -51.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.9% | -2.6% | +17.0% | +1.5% | -43.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.9% | +220.6% | +3.5% | +202.1% | +59.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.7% | -7.1% | +11.0% | -5.5% | -21.7% |
Risk & Volatility
CVS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CVS is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UNH's 0.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CVS currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs HUM's 78.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.44x | 0.59x | 0.05x | 0.46x | 0.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.22 | $395.52 | $88.63 | $424.24 | $315.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.47 | $234.60 | $58.35 | $273.71 | $163.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.9% | +93.5% | +98.5% | +87.9% | +78.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.6 | 75.9 | 69.3 | 75.5 | 76.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 7.9M | 7.4M | 1.9M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — UNH and CVS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EHAB as "Hold", UNH as "Buy", CVS as "Buy", ELV as "Buy", HUM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 9.0% upside for CVS (target: $95) vs -1.8% for EHAB (target: $14). For income investors, CVS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.06% vs HUM's 1.44%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.53 | $385.43 | $95.20 | $382.38 | $246.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 52 | 41 | 37 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.4% | +3.1% | +1.8% | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 25 | 0 | 15 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $8.70 | $2.67 | $6.89 | $3.56 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.7% | 0.0% | +3.2% | +0.5% |
EHAB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CVS leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
EHAB vs UNH vs CVS vs ELV vs HUM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EHAB or UNH or CVS or ELV or HUM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Elevance Health Inc.
(ELV) is the stronger pick with 12. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 4% for Enhabit, Inc. (EHAB). Elevance Health Inc. (ELV) offers the better valuation at 14. 8x trailing P/E (13. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) a "Buy" — based on 52 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EHAB or UNH or CVS or ELV or HUM?
On trailing P/E, Elevance Health Inc.
(ELV) is the cheapest at 14. 8x versus CVS Health Corporation at 62. 8x. On forward P/E, CVS Health Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EHAB or UNH or CVS or ELV or HUM?
Over the past 5 years, CVS Health Corporation (CVS) delivered a total return of +17.
0%, compared to -44. 9% for Enhabit, Inc. (EHAB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UNH returned +220. 6% versus EHAB's -44. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EHAB or UNH or CVS or ELV or HUM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CVS Health Corporation (CVS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
05β versus Humana Inc. 's 0. 61β — meaning HUM is approximately 1110% more volatile than CVS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Humana Inc. (HUM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 73% versus 124% for CVS Health Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EHAB or UNH or CVS or ELV or HUM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Elevance Health Inc.
(ELV) is pulling ahead at 12. 6% versus 2. 4% for Enhabit, Inc. (EHAB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Enhabit, Inc. grew EPS 97. 1% year-over-year, compared to -62. 0% for CVS Health Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, HUM leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EHAB or UNH or CVS or ELV or HUM?
Elevance Health Inc.
(ELV) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 8% net margin versus -0. 4% for Enhabit, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EHAB leads at 6. 0% versus 1. 1% for HUM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EHAB leads at 46. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EHAB or UNH or CVS or ELV or HUM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, CVS Health Corporation (CVS) trades at 12.
2x forward P/E versus 27. 7x for Humana Inc. — 15. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVS: 9. 0% to $95. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — EHAB or UNH or CVS or ELV or HUM?
In this comparison, CVS (3.
1% yield), UNH (2. 4% yield), ELV (1. 8% yield), HUM (1. 4% yield) pay a dividend. EHAB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is EHAB or UNH or CVS or ELV or HUM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CVS Health Corporation (CVS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
05), 3. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CVS: +3. 5%, EHAB: -44. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EHAB and UNH and CVS and ELV and HUM?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: EHAB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UNH is a large-cap quality compounder stock; CVS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; ELV is a mid-cap deep-value stock; HUM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. UNH, CVS, ELV, HUM pay a dividend while EHAB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.