Luxury Goods
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ELA vs EBAY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
ELA vs EBAY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Luxury Goods | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $604M | $48.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $291M | $11.60B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $21M | $2.04B |
| Gross Margin | 21.5% | 72.0% |
| Operating Margin | 9.0% | 19.6% |
| Forward P/E | 48.0x | 17.4x |
| Total Debt | $20M | $7.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18M | $1.87B |
ELA vs EBAY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Envela Corporation (ELA) | 100 | 648.2 | +548.2% |
| eBay Inc. (EBAY) | 100 | 233.7 | +133.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ELA vs EBAY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ELA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 33.6%, EPS growth 115.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.94, Low D/E 29.6%, current ratio 3.50x
- 33.6% revenue growth vs EBAY's 7.9%
EBAY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 1.1%
- 369.5% 10Y total return vs ELA's -5.4%
- Beta 0.73, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.10x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 33.6% revenue growth vs EBAY's 7.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.4x vs 48.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs ELA's 7.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.73 vs ELA's 0.94 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 7-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +262.5% vs EBAY's +54.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.2% ROA vs EBAY's 11.5%, ROIC 22.8% vs 16.8% |
ELA vs EBAY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ELA vs EBAY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EBAY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EBAY is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 39.9x ELA's $291M. EBAY is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ELA's 7.2%. On growth, ELA holds the edge at +103.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $291M | $11.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $28M | $2.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $21M | $2.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $21M | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.5% | +72.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | +19.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.2% | +17.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.3% | +14.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +103.9% | +19.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | +5.7% |
Valuation Metrics
EBAY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.5x trailing earnings, EBAY trades at a 41% valuation discount to ELA's 41.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EBAY's 21.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ELA's 30.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $604M | $48.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $606M | $54.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 41.55x | 24.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 47.98x | 17.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.25x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 30.33x | 21.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.51x | 4.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.01x | 10.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 437.72x | 29.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ELA leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EBAY delivers a 44.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $32 for ELA. ELA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EBAY's 1.60x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +32.0% | +44.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +22.2% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +22.8% | +16.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +25.4% | +17.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.30x | 1.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $5.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18M | $1.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $20M | $7.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 66.73x | 10.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ELA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ELA five years ago would be worth $59,514 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,633 for EBAY. Over the past 12 months, ELA leads with a +262.5% total return vs EBAY's +54.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ELA at 52.6% vs EBAY's 33.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +94.1% | +22.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +262.5% | +54.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +255.3% | +137.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +495.1% | +86.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.4% | +369.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +52.6% | +33.4% |
Risk & Volatility
EBAY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EBAY is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ELA's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.94x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.91 | $111.38 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.33 | $67.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.4% | +95.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.9 | 63.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 125K | 5.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ELA as "Buy" and EBAY as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 3.1% upside for EBAY (target: $110) vs -48.4% for ELA (target: $12). EBAY is the only dividend payer here at 1.08% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.00 | $109.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 68 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.15 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +5.1% |
EBAY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ELA leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).
ELA vs EBAY: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ELA or EBAY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Envela Corporation (ELA) is the stronger pick with 33.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 9% for eBay Inc. (EBAY). eBay Inc. (EBAY) offers the better valuation at 24. 5x trailing P/E (17. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Envela Corporation (ELA) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ELA or EBAY?
On trailing P/E, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the cheapest at 24. 5x versus Envela Corporation at 41. 6x. On forward P/E, eBay Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ELA or EBAY?
Over the past 5 years, Envela Corporation (ELA) delivered a total return of +495.
1%, compared to +86. 3% for eBay Inc. (EBAY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EBAY returned +369. 5% versus ELA's -5. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ELA or EBAY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus Envela Corporation's 0. 94β — meaning ELA is approximately 28% more volatile than EBAY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Envela Corporation (ELA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 160% for eBay Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ELA or EBAY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Envela Corporation (ELA) is pulling ahead at 33.
6% versus 7. 9% for eBay Inc. (EBAY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Envela Corporation grew EPS 115. 4% year-over-year, compared to 10. 2% for eBay Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ELA leads at 9. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ELA or EBAY?
eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 3% net margin versus 6. 1% for Envela Corporation — meaning it keeps 18. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EBAY leads at 20. 5% versus 7. 5% for ELA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EBAY leads at 71. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ELA or EBAY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) trades at 17. 4x forward P/E versus 48. 0x for Envela Corporation — 30. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EBAY: 3. 1% to $109. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — ELA or EBAY?
In this comparison, EBAY (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. ELA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ELA or EBAY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 1% yield, +369. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EBAY: +369. 5%, ELA: -5. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ELA and EBAY?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ELA is a small-cap high-growth stock; EBAY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. EBAY pays a dividend while ELA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.