Luxury Goods
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ELA vs EBAY vs AMZN vs REAL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Luxury Goods
ELA vs EBAY vs AMZN vs REAL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Luxury Goods | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Luxury Goods |
| Market Cap | $604M | $48.63B | $2.92T | $3.59B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $291M | $11.60B | $742.78B | $723M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $21M | $2.04B | $90.80B | $-65M |
| Gross Margin | 21.5% | 72.0% | 50.6% | 73.3% |
| Operating Margin | 9.0% | 19.6% | 11.5% | -1.9% |
| Forward P/E | 48.0x | 17.6x | 34.8x | 222.6x |
| Total Debt | $20M | $7.38B | $152.99B | $463M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18M | $1.87B | $86.81B | $151M |
ELA vs EBAY vs AMZN vs REAL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Envela Corporation (ELA) | 100 | 685.8 | +585.8% |
| eBay Inc. (EBAY) | 100 | 236.4 | +136.4% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 223.3 | +123.3% |
| The RealReal, Inc. (REAL) | 100 | 76.4 | -23.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ELA vs EBAY vs AMZN vs REAL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ELA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 33.6%, EPS growth 115.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.94, Low D/E 29.6%, current ratio 3.50x
- 33.6% revenue growth vs EBAY's 7.9%
- +262.5% vs AMZN's +43.7%
EBAY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 1.1%
- Beta 0.73, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.10x
- Lower P/E (17.6x vs 222.6x)
- 17.6% margin vs REAL's -9.0%
AMZN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs EBAY's 369.5%
- PEG 1.24 vs ELA's 2.60
REAL lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 33.6% revenue growth vs EBAY's 7.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.6x vs 222.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs REAL's -9.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.73 vs REAL's 2.95 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 7-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +262.5% vs AMZN's +43.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.2% ROA vs REAL's -17.3% |
ELA vs EBAY vs AMZN vs REAL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ELA vs EBAY vs AMZN vs REAL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ELA leads in 2 of 6 categories
EBAY leads 1 • AMZN leads 1 • REAL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EBAY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 2551.2x ELA's $291M. EBAY is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to REAL's -9.0%. On growth, ELA holds the edge at +103.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $291M | $11.6B | $742.8B | $723M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $28M | $2.6B | $155.9B | $11M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $21M | $2.0B | $90.8B | -$65M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $21M | $1.7B | -$2.5B | $13M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.5% | +72.0% | +50.6% | +73.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | +19.6% | +11.5% | -1.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.2% | +17.6% | +12.2% | -9.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.3% | +14.5% | -0.3% | +1.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +103.9% | +19.5% | +16.6% | +18.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | +5.7% | +74.8% | -150.0% |
Valuation Metrics
AMZN leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.5x trailing earnings, EBAY trades at a 41% valuation discount to ELA's 41.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMZN offers better value at 1.35x vs ELA's 2.25x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $604M | $48.6B | $2.92T | $3.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $606M | $54.1B | $2.98T | $3.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 41.55x | 24.52x | 37.82x | -18.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 47.98x | 17.62x | 34.77x | 222.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.25x | — | 1.35x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 30.33x | 21.03x | 20.47x | 430.51x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.51x | 4.38x | 4.07x | 5.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.01x | 10.61x | 7.14x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 437.72x | 29.28x | 378.98x | 195.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ELA leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EBAY delivers a 44.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $23 for AMZN. ELA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EBAY's 1.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ELA scores 6/9 vs REAL's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +32.0% | +44.1% | +23.3% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +22.2% | +11.5% | +11.5% | -17.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +22.8% | +16.8% | +14.7% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +25.4% | +17.4% | +15.3% | -15.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.30x | 1.60x | 0.37x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $5.5B | $66.2B | $312M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18M | $1.9B | $86.8B | $151M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $20M | $7.4B | $153.0B | $463M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 66.73x | 10.52x | 39.96x | -5.83x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ELA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ELA five years ago would be worth $59,514 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,439 for REAL. Over the past 12 months, ELA leads with a +262.5% total return vs AMZN's +43.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors REAL at 108.4% vs EBAY's 33.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +94.1% | +22.6% | +19.7% | -21.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +262.5% | +54.2% | +43.7% | +75.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +255.3% | +137.4% | +156.2% | +805.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +495.1% | +86.3% | +64.8% | -45.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.4% | +369.5% | +697.8% | -57.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +52.6% | +33.4% | +36.8% | +108.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EBAY and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EBAY is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than REAL's 2.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs REAL's 71.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.96x | 0.73x | 1.50x | 2.88x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.91 | $111.38 | $278.56 | $17.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.33 | $67.87 | $185.01 | $4.70 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.4% | +95.5% | +97.3% | +71.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.9 | 63.1 | 81.1 | 66.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 125K | 5.4M | 45.5M | 3.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ELA as "Buy", EBAY as "Hold", AMZN as "Buy", REAL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 39.4% upside for REAL (target: $17) vs -48.4% for ELA (target: $12). EBAY is the only dividend payer here at 1.08% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.00 | $109.87 | $306.77 | $17.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 68 | 94 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 7 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.15 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +5.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ELA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). EBAY leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
ELA vs EBAY vs AMZN vs REAL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ELA or EBAY or AMZN or REAL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Envela Corporation (ELA) is the stronger pick with 33.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 9% for eBay Inc. (EBAY). eBay Inc. (EBAY) offers the better valuation at 24. 5x trailing P/E (17. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Envela Corporation (ELA) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ELA or EBAY or AMZN or REAL?
On trailing P/E, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the cheapest at 24. 5x versus Envela Corporation at 41. 6x. On forward P/E, eBay Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Amazon. com, Inc. wins at 1. 24x versus Envela Corporation's 2. 60x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ELA or EBAY or AMZN or REAL?
Over the past 5 years, Envela Corporation (ELA) delivered a total return of +495.
1%, compared to -45. 6% for The RealReal, Inc. (REAL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +702. 2% versus REAL's -64. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ELA or EBAY or AMZN or REAL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus The RealReal, Inc. 's 2. 88β — meaning REAL is approximately 293% more volatile than EBAY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Envela Corporation (ELA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 160% for eBay Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ELA or EBAY or AMZN or REAL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Envela Corporation (ELA) is pulling ahead at 33.
6% versus 7. 9% for eBay Inc. (EBAY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Envela Corporation grew EPS 115. 4% year-over-year, compared to 10. 2% for eBay Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMZN leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ELA or EBAY or AMZN or REAL?
eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 3% net margin versus -6. 0% for The RealReal, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EBAY leads at 20. 5% versus -3. 5% for REAL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EBAY leads at 71. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ELA or EBAY or AMZN or REAL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 24x versus Envela Corporation's 2. 60x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, eBay Inc. (EBAY) trades at 17. 6x forward P/E versus 222. 6x for The RealReal, Inc. — 205. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for REAL: 39. 4% to $17. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — ELA or EBAY or AMZN or REAL?
In this comparison, EBAY (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. ELA, AMZN, REAL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ELA or EBAY or AMZN or REAL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 1% yield, +374. 6% 10Y return). The RealReal, Inc. (REAL) carries a higher beta of 2. 88 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EBAY: +374. 6%, REAL: -64. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ELA and EBAY and AMZN and REAL?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ELA is a small-cap high-growth stock; EBAY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; REAL is a small-cap high-growth stock. EBAY pays a dividend while ELA, AMZN, REAL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.