ELAB
PMGC Holdings Inc.
Biotechnology
Market Cap$49K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
ELAB vs AEYE vs ALKT vs HOFV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
AEYE
AudioEye, Inc.
Software - Application
Market Cap$100M
5Y Perf.+84.1%
ALKT
Alkami Technology, Inc.
Software - Application
Market Cap$1.87B
5Y Perf.-21.1%
HOFV
Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company
Entertainment
Market Cap$2M
5Y Perf.-90.4%
ELAB vs AEYE vs ALKT vs HOFV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ELAB | AEYE | ALKT | HOFV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Software - Application | Software - Application | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $49K | $100M | $1.87B | $2M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $-1M | $40M | $472M | $17M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $-3M | $-50M | $-63M |
| Gross Margin | 72.8% | 78.3% | 57.4% | 63.0% |
| Operating Margin | -75.7% | -7.9% | -9.3% | -158.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 23.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $721K | $354M | $249M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $5M | $63M | $432K |
ELAB vs AEYE vs ALKT vs HOFV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
ELAB
AEYE
ALKT
HOFV
| Stock | Nov 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PMGC Holdings Inc. (ELAB) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) | 100 | 184.1 | +84.1% |
| Alkami Technology, … (ALKT) | 100 | 78.9 | -21.1% |
| Hall of Fame Resort… (HOFV) | 100 | 9.6 | -90.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ELAB vs AEYE vs ALKT vs HOFV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: AEYE and ALKT are tied at the top with 2 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Alkami Technology, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and operational efficiency and capital deployment. ELAB also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ELAB
PMGC Holdings Inc.
The Growth Play
ELAB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 44.1%, EPS growth 86.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.4%
- 44.1% revenue growth vs HOFV's -12.1%
Best for: growth exposure
AEYE
AudioEye, Inc.
The Income Pick
AEYE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.29
- 102.2% 10Y total return vs ALKT's -59.5%
- -7.6% margin vs HOFV's -366.2%
- -27.9% vs ELAB's -99.7%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
ALKT
Alkami Technology, Inc.
The Defensive Pick
ALKT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.30, Low D/E 97.7%, current ratio 2.09x
- Beta 1.30, current ratio 2.09x
- Beta 1.30 vs ELAB's 4.01
- -5.9% ROA vs ELAB's -44.6%, ROIC -8.6% vs -82.7%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
HOFV
Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company
The Lower-Volatility Pick
HOFV lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: communication services exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ELAB | 44.1% revenue growth vs HOFV's -12.1% |
| Quality / Margins | AEYE | -7.6% margin vs HOFV's -366.2% |
| Stability / Safety | ALKT | Beta 1.30 vs ELAB's 4.01 |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | AEYE | -27.9% vs ELAB's -99.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ALKT | -5.9% ROA vs ELAB's -44.6%, ROIC -8.6% vs -82.7% |
ELAB vs AEYE vs ALKT vs HOFV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
FY 2025
Segment breakdown not available.
ELAB vs AEYE vs ALKT vs HOFV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLELABLAGGINGHOFV
Who Leads Where
AEYE leads in 1 of 6 categories
ELAB leads 1 • ALKT leads 1 • HOFV leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓HOFVHall of Fame Resort &…
0leads
ALKTAlkami Technology, In…
1leads
AEYEAudioEye, Inc.
1leads
ELABPMGC Holdings Inc.
1leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs AEYEvs ALKTMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
AEYE3/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
ELAB2/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
ALKT3/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AEYE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALKT and ELAB operate at a comparable scale, with $472M and -$1M in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -7.6% (AEYE) to -3.7% (HOFV). On growth, ALKT holds the edge at +28.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ELABPMGC Holdings Inc. | AEYEAudioEye, Inc. | ALKTAlkami Technology… | HOFVHall of Fame Reso… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | -$1M | $40M | $472M | $17M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | -$504,000 | -$12M | -$10M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | -$3M | -$50M | -$63M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $2M | $44M | -$11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.8% | +78.3% | +57.4% | +63.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -75.7% | -7.9% | -9.3% | -158.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | -7.6% | -10.6% | -3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | +5.5% | +9.4% | -64.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -45.8% | +7.9% | +28.9% | -33.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | +29.0% | -22.7% | -2.0% |
AEYE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
ELAB leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ELABPMGC Holdings Inc. | AEYEAudioEye, Inc. | ALKTAlkami Technology… | HOFVHall of Fame Reso… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $49,114 | $100M | $1.9B | $2M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$4M | $96M | $2.2B | $251M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | -32.36x | -37.89x | -0.04x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 22.99x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 2.49x | 4.20x | 0.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | 20.91x | 5.00x | 0.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 45.09x | — |
ELAB leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — AEYE and HOFV each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKT delivers a -14.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-14 in annual profit, vs $-2 for HOFV. AEYE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HOFV's 3.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ELAB scores 4/9 vs HOFV's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ELABPMGC Holdings Inc. | AEYEAudioEye, Inc. | ALKTAlkami Technology… | HOFVHall of Fame Reso… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -78.4% | -47.8% | -14.0% | -2.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -44.6% | -9.5% | -5.9% | -17.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -82.7% | -42.4% | -8.6% | -6.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -33.7% | -17.7% | -9.3% | -7.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.15x | 0.98x | 3.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | -$5M | $290M | $249M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $5M | $63M | $432,174 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $721,000 | $354M | $249M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -17.68x | -2.79x | -3.73x | -1.04x |
Evenly matched — AEYE and HOFV each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ALKT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALKT five years ago would be worth $4,510 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for ELAB. Over the past 12 months, AEYE leads with a -27.9% total return vs ELAB's -99.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALKT at 12.2% vs ELAB's -98.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ELABPMGC Holdings Inc. | AEYEAudioEye, Inc. | ALKTAlkami Technology… | HOFVHall of Fame Reso… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -98.4% | -18.7% | -23.1% | 0.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.7% | -27.9% | -37.8% | -50.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +20.6% | +41.1% | -95.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -60.2% | -54.9% | -99.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +102.2% | -59.5% | -99.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -98.7% | +6.4% | +12.2% | -63.1% |
ALKT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALKT and HOFV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOFV is the less volatile stock with a -0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ELAB's 4.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALKT currently trades 55.1% from its 52-week high vs ELAB's 0.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ELABPMGC Holdings Inc. | AEYEAudioEye, Inc. | ALKTAlkami Technology… | HOFVHall of Fame Reso… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.94x | 2.18x | 1.23x | -0.62x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1236.48 | $16.39 | $31.66 | $0.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.62 | $5.31 | $14.11 | $0.24 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.2% | +49.4% | +55.1% | +38.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.7 | 61.3 | 50.9 | 43.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10.4M | 194K | 1.9M | 0 |
Evenly matched — ALKT and HOFV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AEYE and ALKT each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ELABPMGC Holdings Inc. | AEYEAudioEye, Inc. | ALKTAlkami Technology… | HOFVHall of Fame Reso… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $22.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 12 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Evenly matched — AEYE and ALKT each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
AEYE leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). ELAB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
Best OverallPMGC Holdings Inc. (ELAB)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
ELAB vs AEYE vs ALKT vs HOFV: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ELAB or AEYE or ALKT or HOFV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PMGC Holdings Inc.
(ELAB) is the stronger pick with 44. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 1% for Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company (HOFV). Analysts rate Alkami Technology, Inc. (ALKT) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ELAB or AEYE or ALKT or HOFV?
Over the past 5 years, Alkami Technology, Inc.
(ALKT) delivered a total return of -54. 9%, compared to -100. 0% for PMGC Holdings Inc. (ELAB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AEYE returned +96. 5% versus ELAB's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ELAB or AEYE or ALKT or HOFV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company (HOFV) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
62β versus PMGC Holdings Inc. 's 3. 94β — meaning ELAB is approximately -736% more volatile than HOFV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 3% for Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ELAB or AEYE or ALKT or HOFV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PMGC Holdings Inc.
(ELAB) is pulling ahead at 44. 1% versus -12. 1% for Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company (HOFV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PMGC Holdings Inc. grew EPS 86. 0% year-over-year, compared to -12. 2% for Alkami Technology, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ELAB leads at 1340% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ELAB or AEYE or ALKT or HOFV?
AudioEye, Inc.
(AEYE) is the more profitable company, earning -7. 6% net margin versus -263. 4% for Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company — meaning it keeps -7. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AEYE leads at -7. 9% versus -139. 9% for HOFV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AEYE leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ELAB or AEYE or ALKT or HOFV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is ELAB or AEYE or ALKT or HOFV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company (HOFV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
62)). PMGC Holdings Inc. (ELAB) carries a higher beta of 3. 94 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HOFV: -99. 8%, ELAB: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ELAB and AEYE and ALKT and HOFV?
These companies operate in different sectors (ELAB (Healthcare) and AEYE (Technology) and ALKT (Technology) and HOFV (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ELAB is a small-cap high-growth stock; AEYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALKT is a small-cap high-growth stock; HOFV is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(ELAB: -45.8% · AEYE: 7.9%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.