Diversified Utilities
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ELPC vs GEV vs NEE vs SO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Renewable Utilities
Regulated Electric
Regulated Electric
ELPC vs GEV vs NEE vs SO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Diversified Utilities | Renewable Utilities | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric |
| Market Cap | $2.29B | $281.02B | $194.60B | $104.20B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $27.27B | $39.38B | $27.93B | $30.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.72B | $9.38B | $8.18B | $4.36B |
| Gross Margin | 25.5% | 19.9% | 47.8% | 43.1% |
| Operating Margin | 19.0% | 3.9% | 29.5% | 24.1% |
| Forward P/E | 3.1x | 37.6x | 23.1x | 20.2x |
| Total Debt | $20.31B | $0.00 | $95.62B | $65.82B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.13B | $8.85B | $2.81B | $1.64B |
ELPC vs GEV vs NEE vs SO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Companhia Paranaens… (ELPC) | 100 | 183.1 | +83.1% |
| GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) | 100 | 764.7 | +664.7% |
| NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) | 100 | 146.0 | +46.0% |
| The Southern Company (SO) | 100 | 128.8 | +28.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ELPC vs GEV vs NEE vs SO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ELPC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.91, yield 21.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.91, Low D/E 87.9%, current ratio 0.98x
- PEG 0.12 vs SO's 3.45
- Beta 0.91, yield 21.8%, current ratio 0.98x
GEV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs NEE's 266.0%
- +157.4% vs SO's +3.6%
- 15.2% ROA vs SO's 2.8%, ROIC 27.9% vs 5.3%
NEE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 11.0%, EPS growth -2.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.4%
- 29.3% margin vs ELPC's 10.0%
- Beta 0.21 vs GEV's 1.76
SO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.0% revenue growth vs GEV's 8.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.1x vs 20.2x), PEG 0.12 vs 3.45 | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.3% margin vs ELPC's 10.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs GEV's 1.76 | |
| Dividends | 21.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs NEE's 2.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +157.4% vs SO's +3.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.2% ROA vs SO's 2.8%, ROIC 27.9% vs 5.3% |
ELPC vs GEV vs NEE vs SO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ELPC vs GEV vs NEE vs SO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GEV leads in 2 of 6 categories
NEE leads 1 • ELPC leads 1 • SO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NEE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GEV and ELPC operate at a comparable scale, with $39.4B and $27.3B in trailing revenue. NEE is the more profitable business, keeping 29.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ELPC's 10.0%. On growth, ELPC holds the edge at +17.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $27.3B | $39.4B | $27.9B | $30.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6.7B | $2.2B | $15.5B | $13.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.7B | $9.4B | $8.2B | $4.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $354M | $3.6B | -$3.8B | -$3.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.5% | +19.9% | +47.8% | +43.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.0% | +3.9% | +29.5% | +24.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.0% | +23.8% | +29.3% | +14.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +9.2% | -13.6% | -12.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.7% | +16.1% | +7.3% | +8.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.3% | +18.2% | +160.0% | -0.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ELPC leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.3x trailing earnings, ELPC trades at a 93% valuation discount to GEV's 59.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ELPC offers better value at 0.16x vs SO's 4.03x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $281.0B | $194.6B | $104.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.8B | $272.2B | $287.4B | $168.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 4.28x | 59.12x | 28.36x | 23.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 3.13x | 37.62x | 23.07x | 20.21x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.16x | — | 1.64x | 4.03x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.78x | 121.45x | 18.73x | 12.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.44x | 7.38x | 7.08x | 3.53x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.49x | 23.47x | 2.93x | 2.64x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.10x | 75.73x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GEV leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GEV delivers a 79.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $80 in annual profit, vs $11 for ELPC. ELPC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.88x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SO's 1.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GEV scores 6/9 vs SO's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.1% | +79.7% | +12.7% | +11.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.4% | +15.2% | +3.9% | +2.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.5% | +27.9% | +4.1% | +5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.4% | +6.6% | +4.7% | +5.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.88x | — | 1.44x | 1.69x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $17.2B | -$8.8B | $92.8B | $64.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.1B | $8.8B | $2.8B | $1.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $20.3B | $0 | $95.6B | $65.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.80x | — | 1.99x | 2.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GEV leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GEV five years ago would be worth $79,830 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,819 for NEE. Over the past 12 months, GEV leads with a +157.4% total return vs SO's +3.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GEV at 99.9% vs NEE's 9.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +46.3% | +54.0% | +16.1% | +6.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +75.9% | +157.4% | +42.0% | +3.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +72.7% | +698.3% | +31.0% | +35.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +72.7% | +698.3% | +38.2% | +60.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +72.7% | +698.3% | +266.0% | +137.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.0% | +99.9% | +9.4% | +10.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NEE and SO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SO is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GEV's 1.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NEE currently trades 94.5% from its 52-week high vs GEV's 88.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.91x | 1.76x | 0.21x | -0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.65 | $1181.95 | $98.75 | $100.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.32 | $387.03 | $63.88 | $83.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.3% | +88.5% | +94.5% | +91.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.4 | 66.5 | 54.3 | 43.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 405K | 2.4M | 8.7M | 4.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ELPC and NEE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GEV as "Buy", NEE as "Buy", SO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 7.8% upside for SO (target: $100) vs -15.6% for ELPC (target: $10). For income investors, ELPC offers the higher dividend yield at 21.84% vs NEE's 2.40%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.40 | $1119.95 | $98.13 | $99.62 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 28 | 36 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +21.8% | +0.1% | +2.4% | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 | 30 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $13.32 | $1.00 | $2.24 | $2.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +1.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GEV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). NEE leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
ELPC vs GEV vs NEE vs SO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ELPC or GEV or NEE or SO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Companhia Paranaense de Energia (ELPC) is the stronger pick with 13.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 9% for GE Vernova Inc. (GEV). Companhia Paranaense de Energia (ELPC) offers the better valuation at 4. 3x trailing P/E (3. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ELPC or GEV or NEE or SO?
On trailing P/E, Companhia Paranaense de Energia (ELPC) is the cheapest at 4.
3x versus GE Vernova Inc. at 59. 1x. On forward P/E, Companhia Paranaense de Energia is actually cheaper at 3. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Companhia Paranaense de Energia wins at 0. 12x versus The Southern Company's 3. 45x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ELPC or GEV or NEE or SO?
Over the past 5 years, GE Vernova Inc.
(GEV) delivered a total return of +698. 3%, compared to +38. 2% for NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GEV returned +698. 3% versus ELPC's +72. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ELPC or GEV or NEE or SO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Southern Company (SO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
15β versus GE Vernova Inc. 's 1. 76β — meaning GEV is approximately -1258% more volatile than SO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Companhia Paranaense de Energia (ELPC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 88% versus 169% for The Southern Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ELPC or GEV or NEE or SO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Companhia Paranaense de Energia (ELPC) is pulling ahead at 13.
0% versus 8. 9% for GE Vernova Inc. (GEV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GE Vernova Inc. grew EPS 217. 0% year-over-year, compared to -17. 6% for Companhia Paranaense de Energia. Over a 3-year CAGR, NEE leads at 9. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ELPC or GEV or NEE or SO?
NextEra Energy, Inc.
(NEE) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 9% net margin versus 10. 3% for Companhia Paranaense de Energia — meaning it keeps 24. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NEE leads at 30. 1% versus 3. 6% for GEV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NEE leads at 62. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ELPC or GEV or NEE or SO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Companhia Paranaense de Energia (ELPC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 12x versus The Southern Company's 3. 45x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Companhia Paranaense de Energia (ELPC) trades at 3. 1x forward P/E versus 37. 6x for GE Vernova Inc. — 34. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SO: 7. 8% to $99. 62.
08Which pays a better dividend — ELPC or GEV or NEE or SO?
In this comparison, ELPC (21.
8% yield), SO (2. 9% yield), NEE (2. 4% yield) pay a dividend. GEV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ELPC or GEV or NEE or SO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Southern Company (SO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
15), 2. 9% yield, +137. 8% 10Y return). GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) carries a higher beta of 1. 76 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SO: +137. 8%, GEV: +698. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ELPC and GEV and NEE and SO?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ELPC is a small-cap deep-value stock; GEV is a large-cap quality compounder stock; NEE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. ELPC, NEE, SO pay a dividend while GEV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.