EML vs ASTE vs CMI vs TEX

For growth investors, Astec Industries, Inc.

(ASTE) is the stronger pick with 8. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 7% for The Eastern Company (EML). Terex Corporation (TEX) offers the better valuation at 19. 2x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Terex Corporation (TEX) is the cheapest at 19.

2x versus Cummins Inc. at 32. 2x. On forward P/E, The Eastern Company is actually cheaper at 11. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Terex Corporation wins at 0. 14x versus Cummins Inc. 's 2. 01x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Cummins Inc.

(CMI) delivered a total return of +179. 2%, compared to -27. 4% for The Eastern Company (EML). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CMI returned +530. 6% versus ASTE's +3. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Eastern Company (EML) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

66β versus Terex Corporation's 2. 09β — meaning TEX is approximately 218% more volatile than EML relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Eastern Company (EML) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 43% versus 134% for Terex Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Astec Industries, Inc.

(ASTE) is pulling ahead at 8. 1% versus -8. 7% for The Eastern Company (EML). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Astec Industries, Inc. grew EPS 784. 2% year-over-year, compared to -32. 9% for Terex Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TEX leads at 7. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Cummins Inc.

(CMI) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 4% net margin versus 2. 1% for The Eastern Company — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CMI leads at 11. 5% versus 4. 1% for EML. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASTE leads at 26. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Terex Corporation (TEX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 14x versus Cummins Inc. 's 2. 01x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Eastern Company (EML) trades at 11. 0x forward P/E versus 22. 7x for Cummins Inc. — 11. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TEX: 27. 5% to $81. 33.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

The Eastern Company (EML) offers the highest yield at 2. 0%, versus 1. 0% for Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE).

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Eastern Company (EML) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

66), 2. 0% yield). Terex Corporation (TEX) carries a higher beta of 2. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EML: +61. 1%, TEX: +225. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.