Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
EML vs OSK vs PCAR vs ATI vs CMI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Agricultural - Machinery
Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Industrial - Machinery
EML vs OSK vs PCAR vs ATI vs CMI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories | Industrial - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $131M | $64.40B | $62.37B | $27.18B | $91.13B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $243M | $10.43B | $27.24B | $4.59B | $33.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $578M | $2.48B | $426M | $2.67B |
| Gross Margin | 21.7% | 16.5% | 15.1% | 22.5% | 25.4% |
| Operating Margin | 3.0% | 8.1% | 9.7% | 14.5% | 11.2% |
| Forward P/E | 11.0x | 12.4x | 20.9x | 45.1x | 22.7x |
| Total Debt | $54M | $1.54B | $0.00 | $1.95B | $8.11B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $480M | $9.25B | $417M | $2.85B |
EML vs OSK vs PCAR vs ATI vs CMI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Eastern Company (EML) | 100 | 121.7 | +21.7% |
| Oshkosh Corporation (OSK) | 100 | 188.6 | +88.6% |
| PACCAR Inc (PCAR) | 100 | 237.5 | +137.5% |
| ATI Inc. (ATI) | 100 | 1947.8 | +1847.8% |
| Cummins Inc. (CMI) | 100 | 380.7 | +280.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EML vs OSK vs PCAR vs ATI vs CMI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EML is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 43.2%, current ratio 3.59x
- Beta 0.66, yield 2.0%, current ratio 3.59x
- Lower P/E (11.0x vs 22.7x)
- Beta 0.66 vs CMI's 1.64, lower leverage
OSK is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.76 vs CMI's 2.01
PCAR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.00, yield 3.6%
- 3.6% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs CMI's 1.2%
ATI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 5.2%, EPS growth 11.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.1%
- 13.9% 10Y total return vs CMI's 5.3%
- 5.2% revenue growth vs PCAR's -15.5%
- 9.3% margin vs EML's 1.6%
Among these 5 stocks, CMI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.2% revenue growth vs PCAR's -15.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.0x vs 22.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.3% margin vs EML's 1.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs CMI's 1.64, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs CMI's 1.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +135.9% vs EML's -6.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.4% ROA vs EML's 1.7%, ROIC 14.5% vs 4.5% |
EML vs OSK vs PCAR vs ATI vs CMI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EML vs OSK vs PCAR vs ATI vs CMI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ATI leads in 2 of 6 categories
EML leads 1 • OSK leads 0 • PCAR leads 0 • CMI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ATI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CMI is the larger business by revenue, generating $33.9B annually — 139.6x EML's $243M. ATI is the more profitable business, keeping 9.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EML's 1.6%. On growth, CMI holds the edge at +2.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $243M | $10.4B | $27.2B | $4.6B | $33.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12M | $1.1B | $3.3B | $837M | $4.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $578M | $2.5B | $426M | $2.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | $849M | $3.4B | $552M | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.7% | +16.5% | +15.1% | +22.5% | +25.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | +8.1% | +9.7% | +14.5% | +11.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | +5.5% | +9.1% | +9.3% | +7.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | +8.1% | +12.5% | +12.0% | +7.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.7% | +0.2% | -16.2% | +0.6% | +2.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -65.6% | -60.5% | +19.8% | +26.9% | -21.0% |
Valuation Metrics
EML leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.5x trailing earnings, OSK trades at a 81% valuation discount to ATI's 69.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), OSK offers better value at 0.83x vs CMI's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $131M | $64.4B | $62.4B | $27.2B | $91.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $178M | $65.5B | $53.1B | $28.7B | $96.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.89x | 13.48x | 26.28x | 69.64x | 32.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.98x | 12.36x | 20.88x | 45.14x | 22.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.83x | 2.08x | — | 2.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.88x | 55.99x | 14.02x | 35.35x | 19.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.53x | 6.18x | 2.19x | 5.92x | 2.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.06x | 11.14x | 3.24x | 14.68x | 6.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.79x | 104.21x | 20.59x | 81.45x | 38.19x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — PCAR and ATI each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ATI delivers a 22.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $3 for EML. OSK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ATI's 1.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ATI scores 8/9 vs PCAR's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.1% | +12.9% | +17.2% | +22.7% | +20.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +5.8% | +6.6% | +8.4% | +7.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.5% | +13.5% | +12.2% | +14.5% | +16.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | +13.7% | +8.9% | +15.6% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.43x | 0.34x | — | 1.02x | 0.61x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $46M | $1.1B | -$9.3B | $1.5B | $5.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $480M | $9.3B | $417M | $2.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $54M | $1.5B | $0 | $1.9B | $8.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.90x | 7.20x | 129.28x | 6.78x | 12.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ATI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ATI five years ago would be worth $84,316 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,258 for EML. Over the past 12 months, ATI leads with a +135.9% total return vs EML's -6.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ATI at 71.1% vs EML's 10.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.9% | +3.0% | +6.8% | +66.5% | +27.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -6.1% | +23.3% | +29.5% | +135.9% | +105.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.5% | +68.0% | +67.0% | +401.0% | +196.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.4% | +12.7% | +121.7% | +743.2% | +179.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.1% | +230.6% | +293.1% | +1394.1% | +530.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.7% | +18.9% | +18.6% | +71.1% | +43.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EML and ATI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EML is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMI's 1.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ATI currently trades 97.5% from its 52-week high vs OSK's 74.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.66x | 1.46x | 1.00x | 1.64x | 1.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.77 | $180.49 | $131.88 | $203.59 | $718.08 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.61 | $106.37 | $90.05 | $70.42 | $307.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.2% | +74.8% | +89.9% | +97.5% | +91.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.9 | 50.7 | 54.6 | 75.0 | 49.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 16K | 676K | 2.7M | 1.7M | 759K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PCAR and CMI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OSK as "Buy", PCAR as "Hold", ATI as "Buy", CMI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.8% upside for OSK (target: $171) vs -11.8% for ATI (target: $175). For income investors, PCAR offers the higher dividend yield at 3.63% vs OSK's 0.26%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $171.20 | $127.40 | $175.00 | $727.91 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 37 | 45 | 29 | 51 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +0.3% | +3.6% | +0.0% | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 12 | 5 | 0 | 20 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.44 | $0.35 | $4.30 | $0.09 | $7.61 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.8% | +0.4% | +0.1% | +1.7% | 0.0% |
ATI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). EML leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
EML vs OSK vs PCAR vs ATI vs CMI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EML or OSK or PCAR or ATI or CMI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ATI Inc.
(ATI) is the stronger pick with 5. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 5% for PACCAR Inc (PCAR). Oshkosh Corporation (OSK) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (12. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Oshkosh Corporation (OSK) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EML or OSK or PCAR or ATI or CMI?
On trailing P/E, Oshkosh Corporation (OSK) is the cheapest at 13.
5x versus ATI Inc. at 69. 6x. On forward P/E, The Eastern Company is actually cheaper at 11. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Oshkosh Corporation wins at 0. 76x versus Cummins Inc. 's 2. 01x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EML or OSK or PCAR or ATI or CMI?
Over the past 5 years, ATI Inc.
(ATI) delivered a total return of +743. 2%, compared to -27. 4% for The Eastern Company (EML). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ATI returned +1394% versus EML's +61. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EML or OSK or PCAR or ATI or CMI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Eastern Company (EML) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
66β versus Cummins Inc. 's 1. 64β — meaning CMI is approximately 150% more volatile than EML relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Oshkosh Corporation (OSK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 102% for ATI Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EML or OSK or PCAR or ATI or CMI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ATI Inc.
(ATI) is pulling ahead at 5. 2% versus -15. 5% for PACCAR Inc (PCAR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Eastern Company grew EPS 161. 3% year-over-year, compared to -42. 9% for PACCAR Inc. Over a 3-year CAGR, OSK leads at 8. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EML or OSK or PCAR or ATI or CMI?
ATI Inc.
(ATI) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 8% net margin versus 2. 1% for The Eastern Company — meaning it keeps 8. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ATI leads at 13. 8% versus 4. 1% for EML. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CMI leads at 25. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EML or OSK or PCAR or ATI or CMI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Oshkosh Corporation (OSK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 76x versus Cummins Inc. 's 2. 01x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Eastern Company (EML) trades at 11. 0x forward P/E versus 45. 1x for ATI Inc. — 34. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OSK: 26. 8% to $171. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — EML or OSK or PCAR or ATI or CMI?
In this comparison, PCAR (3.
6% yield), EML (2. 0% yield), CMI (1. 2% yield), OSK (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. ATI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is EML or OSK or PCAR or ATI or CMI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Eastern Company (EML) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
66), 2. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EML: +61. 1%, OSK: +230. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EML and OSK and PCAR and ATI and CMI?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: EML is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OSK is a mid-cap deep-value stock; PCAR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; ATI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CMI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. EML, PCAR, CMI pay a dividend while OSK, ATI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.