Waste Management
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ENGS vs NRGV vs GREE vs SPRU vs RUN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Renewable Utilities
Financial - Capital Markets
Solar
Solar
ENGS vs NRGV vs GREE vs SPRU vs RUN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Waste Management | Renewable Utilities | Financial - Capital Markets | Solar | Solar |
| Market Cap | $18M | $716M | $19M | $63M | $3.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10M | $217M | $60M | $108M | $3.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1M | $-115M | $-2M | $-25M | $568M |
| Gross Margin | 22.3% | 22.1% | 79.7% | 61.3% | 23.5% |
| Operating Margin | -2.4% | -35.8% | -19.2% | 8.5% | -1.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 22.8x |
| Total Debt | $9M | $95M | $68M | $711M | $14.89B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $261K | $58M | $9M | $73M | $1.24B |
ENGS vs NRGV vs GREE vs SPRU vs RUN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Energys Group Limit… (ENGS) | 100 | 13.3 | -86.7% |
| Energy Vault Holdin… (NRGV) | 100 | 553.3 | +453.3% |
| Greenidge Generatio… (GREE) | 100 | 114.0 | +14.0% |
| Spruce Power Holdin… (SPRU) | 100 | 173.1 | +73.1% |
| Sunrun Inc. (RUN) | 100 | 200.3 | +100.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ENGS vs NRGV vs GREE vs SPRU vs RUN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ENGS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NRGV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 340.9%, EPS growth 28.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.8%
- 340.9% revenue growth vs GREE's -15.4%
- +447.1% vs ENGS's -55.0%
Among these 5 stocks, GREE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SPRU ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.33
- Lower volatility, beta 0.33, current ratio 2.29x
- Beta 0.33, current ratio 2.29x
- Beta 0.33 vs GREE's 3.33
RUN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 86.7% 10Y total return vs NRGV's -57.1%
- 17.9% margin vs NRGV's -53.0%
- 2.5% ROA vs NRGV's -40.3%, ROIC -0.5% vs -49.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 340.9% revenue growth vs GREE's -15.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.9% margin vs NRGV's -53.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.33 vs GREE's 3.33 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +447.1% vs ENGS's -55.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.5% ROA vs NRGV's -40.3%, ROIC -0.5% vs -49.5% |
ENGS vs NRGV vs GREE vs SPRU vs RUN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ENGS vs NRGV vs GREE vs SPRU vs RUN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RUN leads in 1 of 6 categories
NRGV leads 1 • ENGS leads 0 • GREE leads 0 • SPRU leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GREE and RUN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RUN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 330.7x ENGS's $10M. RUN is the more profitable business, keeping 17.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NRGV's -53.0%. On growth, NRGV holds the edge at +156.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $217M | $60M | $108M | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$72M | $4M | $36M | $541M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$115M | -$2M | -$25M | $568M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$98M | -$20M | -$25M | -$326M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.3% | +22.1% | +79.7% | +61.3% | +23.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | -35.8% | -19.2% | +8.5% | -1.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -11.6% | -53.0% | -33.2% | -23.2% | +17.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -15.3% | -45.2% | -37.7% | -23.4% | -10.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +156.4% | — | +43.7% | +43.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -42.9% | +2.3% | +98.3% | +2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ENGS and GREE and SPRU and RUN each lead in 1 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, RUN's 24.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GREE's 38.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $18M | $716M | $19M | $63M | $3.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $29M | $752M | $79M | $701M | $16.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -11.82x | -6.37x | -0.65x | -0.91x | 8.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 22.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 38.86x | — | 24.31x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.37x | 3.52x | 0.32x | 0.77x | 1.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 7.50x | — | 0.44x | 0.75x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RUN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RUN delivers a 12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-147 for NRGV. NRGV carries lower financial leverage with a 1.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SPRU's 4.87x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ENGS scores 6/9 vs SPRU's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -146.8% | — | -19.7% | +12.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -13.3% | -40.3% | -3.2% | -2.9% | +2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.3% | -49.5% | -57.2% | -5.1% | -0.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -53.7% | -23.9% | -6.1% | -0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.07x | — | 4.87x | 2.99x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8M | $36M | $59M | $638M | $13.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $260,719 | $58M | $9M | $73M | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $95M | $68M | $711M | $14.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.42x | -10.33x | 0.70x | 0.52x | -0.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NRGV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NRGV five years ago would be worth $4,233 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $82 for GREE. Over the past 12 months, NRGV leads with a +447.1% total return vs ENGS's -55.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NRGV at 34.0% vs ENGS's -36.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +47.9% | -15.3% | -25.6% | -34.3% | -29.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -55.0% | +447.1% | +29.0% | +97.7% | +86.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.7% | +140.7% | -71.0% | -35.7% | -19.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.7% | -57.7% | -99.2% | -93.0% | -69.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.7% | -57.1% | -62.9% | -95.6% | +86.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -36.8% | +34.0% | -33.8% | -13.7% | -7.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NRGV and SPRU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SPRU is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GREE's 3.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NRGV currently trades 65.2% from its 52-week high vs ENGS's 10.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.91x | 3.08x | 3.33x | 0.33x | 2.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.48 | $6.35 | $2.42 | $6.75 | $22.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.63 | $0.65 | $0.87 | $1.13 | $5.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +10.0% | +65.2% | +50.4% | +51.6% | +61.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.9 | 53.3 | 52.9 | 41.9 | 49.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 283K | 3.7M | 138K | 44K | 10.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NRGV as "Buy", RUN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.4% upside for RUN (target: $18) vs -33.6% for NRGV (target: $3).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | — | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $2.75 | — | — | $18.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 | — | — | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.3% | 0.0% |
RUN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). NRGV leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
ENGS vs NRGV vs GREE vs SPRU vs RUN: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ENGS or NRGV or GREE or SPRU or RUN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) is the stronger pick with 340. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 4% for Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. (GREE). Sunrun Inc. (RUN) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (22. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ENGS or NRGV or GREE or SPRU or RUN?
Over the past 5 years, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) delivered a total return of -57. 7%, compared to -99. 2% for Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. (GREE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RUN returned +86. 7% versus SPRU's -95. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ENGS or NRGV or GREE or SPRU or RUN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Spruce Power Holding Corporation (SPRU) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
33β versus Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. 's 3. 33β — meaning GREE is approximately 915% more volatile than SPRU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 107% versus 5% for Spruce Power Holding Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ENGS or NRGV or GREE or SPRU or RUN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) is pulling ahead at 340. 9% versus -15. 4% for Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. (GREE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sunrun Inc. grew EPS 113. 3% year-over-year, compared to -6. 7% for Spruce Power Holding Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPRU leads at 73. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ENGS or NRGV or GREE or SPRU or RUN?
Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus -85. 9% for Spruce Power Holding Corporation — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ENGS leads at -2. 4% versus -61. 4% for SPRU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GREE leads at 79. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ENGS or NRGV or GREE or SPRU or RUN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RUN: 31.
4% to $18. 14.
07Which pays a better dividend — ENGS or NRGV or GREE or SPRU or RUN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is ENGS or NRGV or GREE or SPRU or RUN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Spruce Power Holding Corporation (SPRU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
33)). Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. (GREE) carries a higher beta of 3. 33 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SPRU: -95. 6%, GREE: -62. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ENGS and NRGV and GREE and SPRU and RUN?
These companies operate in different sectors (ENGS (Industrials) and NRGV (Utilities) and GREE (Financial Services) and SPRU (Energy) and RUN (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ENGS is a small-cap high-growth stock; NRGV is a small-cap high-growth stock; GREE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPRU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RUN is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.