Regulated Electric
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ENO vs EMP vs ETR vs EAI vs SO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Electric
Regulated Electric
Regulated Electric
Regulated Electric
ENO vs EMP vs ETR vs EAI vs SO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric |
| Market Cap | $10.18B | $9.74B | $51.29B | $9.56B | $104.20B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13.29B | $13.29B | $13.29B | $13.29B | $30.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.78B | $1.78B | $1.80B | $1.78B | $4.36B |
| Gross Margin | 67.5% | 67.5% | 43.3% | 67.5% | 43.1% |
| Operating Margin | 23.1% | 23.1% | 22.6% | 23.1% | 24.1% |
| Forward P/E | 12.6x | 5.4x | 25.4x | 5.3x | 20.1x |
| Total Debt | $3.03B | $3.03B | $30.93B | $3.03B | $65.82B |
| Cash & Equiv. | — | $156M | $46M | $5M | $1.64B |
ENO vs EMP vs ETR vs EAI vs SO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entergy New Orleans… (ENO) | 100 | 83.0 | -17.0% |
| Entergy Mississippi… (EMP) | 100 | 79.3 | -20.7% |
| Entergy Corporation (ETR) | 100 | 219.2 | +119.2% |
| Entergy Arkansas, I… (EAI) | 100 | 80.7 | -19.3% |
| The Southern Company (SO) | 100 | 160.9 | +60.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ENO vs EMP vs ETR vs EAI vs SO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ENO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 9.0%, EPS growth 59.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 135.0%
- 14.5% ROA vs EAI's 0.1%, ROIC 22.5% vs 16.2%
EMP is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.75, Low D/E 17.9%, current ratio 756.51x
- PEG 0.13 vs ETR's 10.02
ETR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.30, yield 2.1%
- 246.8% 10Y total return vs SO's 137.8%
- Beta 0.30, yield 2.1%, current ratio 0.73x
- Beta 0.30 vs EAI's 0.79
EAI is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (5.3x vs 20.1x)
SO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and quality is your priority.
- 10.6% revenue growth vs EAI's 9.0%
- 14.5% margin vs EAI's 13.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.6% revenue growth vs EAI's 9.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.3x vs 20.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.5% margin vs EAI's 13.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.30 vs EAI's 0.79 | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs SO's 2.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.0% vs SO's +3.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.5% ROA vs EAI's 0.1%, ROIC 22.5% vs 16.2% |
ENO vs EMP vs ETR vs EAI vs SO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ENO vs EMP vs ETR vs EAI vs SO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EMP leads in 1 of 6 categories
EAI leads 1 • ENO leads 1 • ETR leads 1 • SO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EMP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SO is the larger business by revenue, generating $30.2B annually — 2.3x EAI's $13.3B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 14.5% (SO) to 13.4% (EAI). On growth, ENO holds the edge at +12.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13.3B | $13.3B | $13.3B | $13.3B | $30.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5.2B | $5.2B | $5.5B | $5.2B | $13.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.8B | $1.8B | $1.8B | $1.8B | $4.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1.1B | $3.9B | -$3.0B | $3.8B | -$3.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.5% | +67.5% | +43.3% | +67.5% | +43.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.1% | +23.1% | +22.6% | +23.1% | +24.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | +13.4% | +13.6% | +13.4% | +14.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.0% | +29.1% | -22.6% | +28.5% | -12.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.0% | +12.0% | +12.0% | +12.0% | +8.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.2% | +1.2% | +1.2% | -87.6% | -0.8% |
Valuation Metrics
EAI leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.3x trailing earnings, EAI trades at a 82% valuation discount to ETR's 28.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ENO offers better value at 0.08x vs ETR's 11.30x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.2B | $9.7B | $51.3B | $9.6B | $104.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.2B | $12.6B | $82.2B | $12.6B | $168.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.63x | 5.38x | 28.65x | 5.28x | 23.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.62x | — | 25.39x | — | 20.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.08x | 0.13x | 11.30x | — | 4.03x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.50x | 2.39x | 14.70x | 2.38x | 12.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.79x | 0.75x | 3.96x | 0.74x | 3.53x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.59x | 0.56x | 2.93x | 0.55x | 2.64x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.22x | 15.51x | — | 15.22x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ENO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EAI delivers a 16.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $11 for ETR. ENO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ETR's 1.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ETR scores 6/9 vs ENO's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.9% | +11.0% | +10.6% | +16.4% | +11.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +14.5% | +0.1% | +2.5% | +0.1% | +2.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +22.5% | +12.9% | +5.0% | +16.2% | +5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +0.1% | +5.0% | +0.1% | +5.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 0.18x | 1.80x | 0.18x | 1.69x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.0B | $2.9B | $30.9B | $3.0B | $64.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | — | $156M | $46M | $5M | $1.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.0B | $3.0B | $30.9B | $3.0B | $65.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.61x | 2.61x | 2.70x | 2.61x | 2.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ETR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ETR five years ago would be worth $22,756 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,452 for EMP. Over the past 12 months, ETR leads with a +36.0% total return vs SO's +3.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ETR at 30.6% vs EAI's 1.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.5% | +4.0% | +20.7% | +1.3% | +6.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.3% | +7.3% | +36.0% | +4.4% | +3.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.0% | +6.3% | +122.9% | +5.0% | +35.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.0% | +4.5% | +127.6% | +4.8% | +60.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.1% | +30.6% | +246.8% | -57.1% | +137.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.9% | +2.1% | +30.6% | +1.7% | +10.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ETR and SO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SO is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EAI's 0.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ETR currently trades 94.6% from its 52-week high vs ENO's 88.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.75x | 0.76x | 0.26x | 0.79x | -0.16x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.95 | $22.50 | $118.44 | $22.22 | $100.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.00 | $5.90 | $79.40 | $5.72 | $83.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.3% | +93.6% | +94.6% | +93.0% | +91.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.6 | 66.4 | 49.3 | 63.5 | 43.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6K | 21K | 2.8M | 24K | 4.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ETR and SO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ETR as "Buy", SO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 7.8% upside for SO (target: $100) vs 4.2% for ETR (target: $117). For income investors, SO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.94% vs ETR's 2.13%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $116.77 | — | $99.62 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 31 | — | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.1% | — | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.39 | — | $2.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
EMP leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). EAI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
ENO vs EMP vs ETR vs EAI vs SO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ENO or EMP or ETR or EAI or SO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Southern Company (SO) is the stronger pick with 10.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 0% for Entergy Arkansas, Inc. 1M BD 4. 875%66 (EAI). Entergy Arkansas, Inc. 1M BD 4. 875%66 (EAI) offers the better valuation at 5. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Entergy Corporation (ETR) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ENO or EMP or ETR or EAI or SO?
On trailing P/E, Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
1M BD 4. 875%66 (EAI) is the cheapest at 5. 3x versus Entergy Corporation at 28. 7x. On forward P/E, Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5. 50% Series due April 1, 2066 is actually cheaper at 12. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5. 50% Series due April 1, 2066 wins at 0. 17x versus Entergy Corporation's 10. 02x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ENO or EMP or ETR or EAI or SO?
Over the past 5 years, Entergy Corporation (ETR) delivered a total return of +127.
6%, compared to +4. 5% for Entergy Mississippi, Inc. 1M BD 66 (EMP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ETR returned +245. 7% versus EAI's -57. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ENO or EMP or ETR or EAI or SO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Southern Company (SO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
16β versus Entergy Arkansas, Inc. 1M BD 4. 875%66's 0. 79β — meaning EAI is approximately -595% more volatile than SO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5. 50% Series due April 1, 2066 (ENO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 180% for Entergy Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ENO or EMP or ETR or EAI or SO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Southern Company (SO) is pulling ahead at 10.
6% versus 9. 0% for Entergy Arkansas, Inc. 1M BD 4. 875%66 (EAI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5. 50% Series due April 1, 2066 grew EPS 59. 6% year-over-year, compared to -80. 0% for Entergy Arkansas, Inc. 1M BD 4. 875%66. Over a 3-year CAGR, ENO leads at 135. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ENO or EMP or ETR or EAI or SO?
The Southern Company (SO) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
7% net margin versus 13. 6% for Entergy Arkansas, Inc. 1M BD 4. 875%66 — meaning it keeps 14. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ENO leads at 24. 7% versus 23. 6% for ETR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ENO leads at 66. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ENO or EMP or ETR or EAI or SO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5. 50% Series due April 1, 2066 (ENO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 17x versus Entergy Corporation's 10. 02x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Entergy New Orleans, LLC First Mortgage Bonds, 5. 50% Series due April 1, 2066 (ENO) trades at 12. 6x forward P/E versus 25. 4x for Entergy Corporation — 12. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SO: 7. 8% to $99. 62.
08Which pays a better dividend — ENO or EMP or ETR or EAI or SO?
In this comparison, SO (2.
9% yield), ETR (2. 1% yield) pay a dividend. ENO, EMP, EAI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ENO or EMP or ETR or EAI or SO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Southern Company (SO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
16), 2. 9% yield, +136. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SO: +136. 5%, EAI: -57. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ENO and EMP and ETR and EAI and SO?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ENO is a mid-cap deep-value stock; EMP is a small-cap deep-value stock; ETR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EAI is a small-cap deep-value stock; SO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. ETR, SO pay a dividend while ENO, EMP, EAI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.