Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ENPH vs GTLS vs RUN vs PLUG vs BE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ENPH
Enphase Energy, Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.80B
5Y Perf.-37.4%
GTLS
Chart Industries, Inc.

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$9.93B
5Y Perf.+428.5%
RUN
Sunrun Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.49B
5Y Perf.-12.5%
PLUG
Plug Power Inc.

Electrical Equipment & Parts

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.34B
5Y Perf.-25.9%
BE
Bloom Energy Corporation

Electrical Equipment & Parts

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$62.75B
5Y Perf.+3150.7%

ENPH vs GTLS vs RUN vs PLUG vs BE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ENPH logoENPH
GTLS logoGTLS
RUN logoRUN
PLUG logoPLUG
BE logoBE
IndustrySolarIndustrial - MachinerySolarElectrical Equipment & PartsElectrical Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$4.80B$9.93B$3.49B$4.34B$62.75B
Revenue (TTM)$1.40B$4.26B$3.17B$710M$2.45B
Net Income (TTM)$135M$40M$568M$-1.63B$6M
Gross Margin44.2%32.6%23.5%99.8%31.1%
Operating Margin6.8%8.5%-1.8%38.1%8.2%
Forward P/E18.0x16.4x15.3x123.5x
Total Debt$1.24B$3.74B$14.89B$997M$2.99B
Cash & Equiv.$474M$366M$1.24B$1M$2.45B

ENPH vs GTLS vs RUN vs PLUG vs BELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ENPH
GTLS
RUN
PLUG
BE
StockMay 20May 26Return
Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH)10062.6-37.4%
Chart Industries, I… (GTLS)100528.5+428.5%
Sunrun Inc. (RUN)10087.5-12.5%
Plug Power Inc. (PLUG)10074.1-25.9%
Bloom Energy Corpor… (BE)1003250.7+3150.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ENPH vs GTLS vs RUN vs PLUG vs BE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: RUN leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Chart Industries, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. ENPH and BE also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ENPH
Enphase Energy, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

ENPH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.69, current ratio 2.07x
  • 4.2% ROA vs PLUG's -64.3%, ROIC 6.8% vs 10.9%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
GTLS
Chart Industries, Inc.
The Income Pick

GTLS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.49, yield 0.3%
  • Beta 0.49, yield 0.3%, current ratio 1.36x
  • Beta 0.49 vs BE's 3.62, lower leverage
  • 0.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability and defensive
RUN
Sunrun Inc.
The Growth Play

RUN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 45.1%, EPS growth 113.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.4%
  • 45.1% revenue growth vs GTLS's 2.5%
  • Lower P/E (15.3x vs 123.5x)
  • 17.9% margin vs PLUG's -229.8%
Best for: growth exposure
PLUG
Plug Power Inc.
The Industrials Pick

Among these 5 stocks, PLUG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: industrials exposure
BE
Bloom Energy Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder

BE is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 9.4% 10Y total return vs ENPH's 17.9%
  • +14.1% vs ENPH's -25.7%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthRUN logoRUN45.1% revenue growth vs GTLS's 2.5%
ValueRUN logoRUNLower P/E (15.3x vs 123.5x)
Quality / MarginsRUN logoRUN17.9% margin vs PLUG's -229.8%
Stability / SafetyGTLS logoGTLSBeta 0.49 vs BE's 3.62, lower leverage
DividendsGTLS logoGTLS0.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)BE logoBE+14.1% vs ENPH's -25.7%
Efficiency (ROA)ENPH logoENPH4.2% ROA vs PLUG's -64.3%, ROIC 6.8% vs 10.9%

ENPH vs GTLS vs RUN vs PLUG vs BE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ENPHEnphase Energy, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$1.5B
GTLSChart Industries, Inc.
FY 2025
Repair, Service And Leasing Segment
30.6%$1.3B
Heat Transfer Systems Segment
29.0%$1.2B
Specialty Products Segment
25.8%$1.1B
Cryo Tank Solutions Segment
14.6%$624M
RUNSunrun Inc.
FY 2025
Service
30.8%$1.8B
Customer Agreements
28.9%$1.7B
Product
19.2%$1.1B
Energy Systems
14.9%$878M
Manufactured Product, Other
4.4%$260M
Incentives
1.9%$111M
PLUGPlug Power Inc.
FY 2025
Sale Of Electrolyzers
26.5%$188M
Fuel Delivered To Customers
18.8%$133M
Power Purchase Agreements
15.2%$108M
Sale of cryogenic equipment
13.5%$96M
Services Performed On Fuel Cell Systems And Related Infrastructure
13.3%$94M
Sales Of Fuel Cell Systems
7.6%$54M
Sale Of Hydrogen Infrastructure
3.8%$27M
Other (2)
1.4%$10M
BEBloom Energy Corporation
FY 2025
Product
75.6%$1.5B
Service
11.3%$228M
Installation
10.2%$206M
Electricity
3.0%$60M

ENPH vs GTLS vs RUN vs PLUG vs BE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLGTLSLAGGINGPLUG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — PLUG and BE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

GTLS is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.3B annually — 6.0x PLUG's $710M. RUN is the more profitable business, keeping 17.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PLUG's -2.3%. On growth, BE holds the edge at +130.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricENPH logoENPHEnphase Energy, I…GTLS logoGTLSChart Industries,…RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.PLUG logoPLUGPlug Power Inc.BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.4B$4.3B$3.2B$710M$2.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$171M$644M$541M-$1.5B$240M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$135M$40M$568M-$1.6B$6M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$145M$203M-$751M-$2M$233M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+44.2%+32.6%+23.5%+99.8%+31.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+6.8%+8.5%-1.8%+38.1%+8.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+9.6%+0.9%+17.9%-2.3%+0.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+10.4%+4.8%-23.6%-0.3%+9.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-20.6%-2.5%+43.2%+17.6%+130.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-127.3%-36.1%+2.1%+95.9%+3.3%
Evenly matched — PLUG and BE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

RUN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 8.5x trailing earnings, RUN trades at a 99% valuation discount to GTLS's 628.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GTLS's 14.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BE's 513.0x.

MetricENPH logoENPHEnphase Energy, I…GTLS logoGTLSChart Industries,…RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.PLUG logoPLUGPlug Power Inc.BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…
Market CapShares × price$4.8B$9.9B$3.5B$4.3B$62.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$5.6B$13.3B$17.1B$5.3B$63.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS28.26x628.58x8.54x-705.49x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.18.04x16.40x15.26x123.47x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate4.48x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple22.72x14.33x24.67x513.03x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.26x2.33x1.18x6.12x31.00x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.52x2.79x0.80x79.14x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF50.09x48.96x1097.28x
RUN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ENPH leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

ENPH delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-124 for PLUG. GTLS carries lower financial leverage with a 1.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLUG's 19.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ENPH scores 6/9 vs BE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricENPH logoENPHEnphase Energy, I…GTLS logoGTLSChart Industries,…RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.PLUG logoPLUGPlug Power Inc.BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+13.3%+1.2%+12.4%-124.4%+0.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.2%+0.4%+2.5%-64.3%+0.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.8%+7.4%-0.5%+10.9%+4.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.8%+8.6%-0.6%+18.6%+2.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965654
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.14x1.11x2.99x19.75x3.77x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$769M$3.4B$13.6B$996M$538M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$474M$366M$1.2B$1M$2.5B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.2B$3.7B$14.9B$997M$3.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense47.60x1.08x-0.02x-36.18x1.05x
ENPH leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BE five years ago would be worth $129,930 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,555 for PLUG. Over the past 12 months, BE leads with a +1414.1% total return vs ENPH's -25.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BE at 148.8% vs ENPH's -39.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricENPH logoENPHEnphase Energy, I…GTLS logoGTLSChart Industries,…RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.PLUG logoPLUGPlug Power Inc.BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+8.0%+0.6%-24.8%+39.9%+164.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-25.7%+31.8%+71.9%+266.9%+1414.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-77.7%+62.7%-15.0%-66.4%+1440.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-69.1%+40.6%-64.2%-84.5%+1199.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1788.6%+772.7%+97.7%+61.7%+944.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-39.3%+17.6%-5.3%-30.5%+148.8%
BE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

GTLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

GTLS is the less volatile stock with a 0.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BE's 3.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GTLS currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs RUN's 65.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricENPH logoENPHEnphase Energy, I…GTLS logoGTLSChart Industries,…RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.PLUG logoPLUGPlug Power Inc.BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.69x0.49x2.81x2.55x3.62x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$54.43$208.51$22.44$4.58$302.99
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$25.78$140.50$5.38$0.69$16.47
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+67.0%+99.5%+65.1%+68.1%+86.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10051.143.855.756.260.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded5.8M1.6M10.3M75.2M10.2M
GTLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

GTLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: ENPH as "Hold", GTLS as "Buy", RUN as "Buy", PLUG as "Buy", BE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.3% upside for PLUG (target: $4) vs -28.1% for BE (target: $188). GTLS is the only dividend payer here at 0.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricENPH logoENPHEnphase Energy, I…GTLS logoGTLSChart Industries,…RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.PLUG logoPLUGPlug Power Inc.BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$42.41$193.81$18.25$3.91$187.56
# AnalystsCovering analysts5537373831
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.3%+0.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises110
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.60$0.00
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.7%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
GTLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

GTLS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook). RUN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallChart Industries, Inc. (GTLS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ENPH vs GTLS vs RUN vs PLUG vs BE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ENPH or GTLS or RUN or PLUG or BE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) is the stronger pick with 45. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 5% for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS). Sunrun Inc. (RUN) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (15. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ENPH or GTLS or RUN or PLUG or BE?

On trailing P/E, Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) is the cheapest at 8. 5x versus Chart Industries, Inc. at 628. 6x. On forward P/E, Sunrun Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 3x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ENPH or GTLS or RUN or PLUG or BE?

Over the past 5 years, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) delivered a total return of +1199%, compared to -84.

5% for Plug Power Inc. (PLUG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENPH returned +1789% versus PLUG's +61. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ENPH or GTLS or RUN or PLUG or BE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chart Industries, Inc.

(GTLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 49β versus Bloom Energy Corporation's 3. 62β — meaning BE is approximately 635% more volatile than GTLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 111% versus 20% for Plug Power Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ENPH or GTLS or RUN or PLUG or BE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) is pulling ahead at 45. 1% versus 2. 5% for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sunrun Inc. grew EPS 113. 3% year-over-year, compared to -184. 6% for Bloom Energy Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, GTLS leads at 38. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ENPH or GTLS or RUN or PLUG or BE?

Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus -229. 8% for Plug Power Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLUG leads at 38. 1% versus -4. 3% for RUN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLUG leads at 99. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ENPH or GTLS or RUN or PLUG or BE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) trades at 15. 3x forward P/E versus 123. 5x for Bloom Energy Corporation — 108. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PLUG: 25. 3% to $3. 91.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ENPH or GTLS or RUN or PLUG or BE?

In this comparison, GTLS (0.

3% yield) pays a dividend. ENPH, RUN, PLUG, BE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is ENPH or GTLS or RUN or PLUG or BE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Chart Industries, Inc.

(GTLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 49), +772. 7% 10Y return). Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) carries a higher beta of 2. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTLS: +772. 7%, PLUG: +61. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ENPH and GTLS and RUN and PLUG and BE?

These companies operate in different sectors (ENPH (Energy) and GTLS (Industrials) and RUN (Energy) and PLUG (Industrials) and BE (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ENPH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GTLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RUN is a small-cap high-growth stock; PLUG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BE is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ENPH

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GTLS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RUN

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 21%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PLUG

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Gross Margin > 59%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BE

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 65%
  • Gross Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ENPH and GTLS and RUN and PLUG and BE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ENPH: -20.6% · GTLS: -2.5%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(ENPH: 28.3x · GTLS: 628.6x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.