Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ENPH vs SEDG vs FSLR vs ARRY vs SHLS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ENPH
Enphase Energy, Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.67B
5Y Perf.-80.5%
SEDG
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$2.35B
5Y Perf.-86.6%
FSLR
First Solar, Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$23.06B
5Y Perf.+116.4%
ARRY
Array Technologies, Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.25B
5Y Perf.-79.9%
SHLS
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.32B
5Y Perf.-76.9%

ENPH vs SEDG vs FSLR vs ARRY vs SHLS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ENPH logoENPH
SEDG logoSEDG
FSLR logoFSLR
ARRY logoARRY
SHLS logoSHLS
IndustrySolarSolarSolarSolarSolar
Market Cap$4.67B$2.35B$23.06B$1.25B$1.32B
Revenue (TTM)$1.40B$1.28B$5.42B$1.21B$536M
Net Income (TTM)$135M$-364M$1.67B$-67M$34M
Gross Margin44.2%18.2%41.7%22.4%33.5%
Operating Margin6.8%-18.6%33.0%4.5%11.2%
Forward P/E17.6x610.9x12.0x11.7x19.4x
Total Debt$1.24B$423M$499M$766M$175M
Cash & Equiv.$474M$540M$2.80B$244M$7M

ENPH vs SEDG vs FSLR vs ARRY vs SHLSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ENPH
SEDG
FSLR
ARRY
SHLS
StockJan 21May 26Return
Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH)10019.5-80.5%
SolarEdge Technolog… (SEDG)10013.4-86.6%
First Solar, Inc. (FSLR)100216.4+116.4%
Array Technologies,… (ARRY)10020.1-79.9%
Shoals Technologies… (SHLS)10023.1-76.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ENPH vs SEDG vs FSLR vs ARRY vs SHLS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FSLR leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Array Technologies, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. SEDG also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ENPH
Enphase Energy, Inc.
The Energy Pick

ENPH lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: energy exposure
SEDG
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

SEDG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +161.4% vs ENPH's -18.9%
Best for: momentum
FSLR
First Solar, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

FSLR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 324.1% 10Y total return vs ENPH's 17.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.39, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 2.67x
  • PEG 0.39 vs ENPH's 2.79
  • Beta 1.39, current ratio 2.67x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
ARRY
Array Technologies, Inc.
The Growth Play

ARRY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 40.2%, EPS growth 62.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.8%
  • 40.2% revenue growth vs ENPH's 10.7%
  • Lower P/E (11.7x vs 19.4x)
Best for: growth exposure
SHLS
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
The Income Pick

SHLS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 2.08
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthARRY logoARRY40.2% revenue growth vs ENPH's 10.7%
ValueARRY logoARRYLower P/E (11.7x vs 19.4x)
Quality / MarginsFSLR logoFSLR30.7% margin vs SEDG's -28.6%
Stability / SafetyFSLR logoFSLRBeta 1.39 vs ARRY's 2.32, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)SEDG logoSEDG+161.4% vs ENPH's -18.9%
Efficiency (ROA)FSLR logoFSLR12.6% ROA vs SEDG's -15.9%, ROIC 17.6% vs -29.5%

ENPH vs SEDG vs FSLR vs ARRY vs SHLS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ENPHEnphase Energy, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$1.5B
SEDGSolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
FY 2025
Optimizers
54.5%$490M
Inverters
37.1%$334M
Other Products
5.9%$53M
Energy Storage Systems
1.8%$16M
Communication
0.7%$6M
FSLRFirst Solar, Inc.
FY 2025
Solar Module
100.0%$15.0B
ARRYArray Technologies, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

SHLSShoals Technologies Group, Inc.
FY 2025
System Solutions
78.7%$374M
Components
21.3%$101M

ENPH vs SEDG vs FSLR vs ARRY vs SHLS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFSLRLAGGINGSEDG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FSLR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

FSLR is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.4B annually — 10.1x SHLS's $536M. FSLR is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SEDG's -28.6%. On growth, SHLS holds the edge at +74.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricENPH logoENPHEnphase Energy, I…SEDG logoSEDGSolarEdge Technol…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.ARRY logoARRYArray Technologie…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.4B$1.3B$5.4B$1.2B$536M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$171M-$225M$2.2B$95M$73M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$135M-$364M$1.7B-$67M$34M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$145M$78M$1.7B$58M-$77M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+44.2%+18.2%+41.7%+22.4%+33.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+6.8%-18.6%+33.0%+4.5%+11.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+9.6%-28.6%+30.7%-5.6%+6.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+10.4%+6.1%+30.8%+4.8%-14.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-20.6%+41.5%+23.6%-26.1%+74.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-127.3%+100.0%+65.1%-7.0%
FSLR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ARRY leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 15.1x trailing earnings, FSLR trades at a 61% valuation discount to SHLS's 39.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FSLR offers better value at 0.49x vs ENPH's 4.36x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricENPH logoENPHEnphase Energy, I…SEDG logoSEDGSolarEdge Technol…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.ARRY logoARRYArray Technologie…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…
Market CapShares × price$4.7B$2.3B$23.1B$1.3B$1.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$5.4B$2.2B$20.8B$1.8B$1.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS27.50x-5.60x15.10x-11.23x39.20x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.17.61x610.92x12.04x11.75x19.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate4.36x0.49x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple22.19x9.38x13.50x22.83x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.17x1.98x4.42x0.98x2.77x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.40x5.40x2.42x4.80x2.20x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF48.75x29.06x19.42x15.72x
ARRY leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FSLR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

FSLR delivers a 18.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-80 for SEDG. FSLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARRY's 2.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SEDG scores 7/9 vs SHLS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricENPH logoENPHEnphase Energy, I…SEDG logoSEDGSolarEdge Technol…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.ARRY logoARRYArray Technologie…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+13.3%-79.6%+18.0%-20.6%+5.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.2%-15.9%+12.6%-4.4%+3.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.8%-29.5%+17.6%+9.0%+5.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.8%-19.2%+15.9%+8.2%+7.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–967755
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.14x0.99x0.05x2.94x0.29x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$769M-$116M-$2.3B$522M$168M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$474M$540M$2.8B$244M$7M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.2B$423M$499M$766M$175M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense47.60x-2.80x53.51x-2.42x5.91x
FSLR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FSLR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FSLR five years ago would be worth $28,755 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,752 for SEDG. Over the past 12 months, SEDG leads with a +161.4% total return vs ENPH's -18.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FSLR at 6.5% vs SEDG's -49.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricENPH logoENPHEnphase Energy, I…SEDG logoSEDGSolarEdge Technol…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.ARRY logoARRYArray Technologie…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+5.1%+23.1%-21.8%-15.3%-13.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-18.9%+161.4%+65.3%+62.7%+66.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-78.3%-86.8%+20.9%-56.1%-60.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-71.2%-82.5%+187.6%-67.7%-72.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1737.8%+70.9%+324.1%-77.5%-74.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-39.9%-49.0%+6.5%-24.0%-26.5%
FSLR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

FSLR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

FSLR is the less volatile stock with a 1.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARRY's 2.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FSLR currently trades 75.0% from its 52-week high vs ENPH's 65.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricENPH logoENPHEnphase Energy, I…SEDG logoSEDGSolarEdge Technol…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.ARRY logoARRYArray Technologie…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.70x2.03x1.39x2.32x2.08x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$54.43$53.75$285.99$12.23$11.36
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$25.78$13.73$125.80$4.92$3.81
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+65.2%+71.8%+75.0%+67.0%+69.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10052.145.764.356.463.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded5.9M3.6M2.1M6.0M5.1M
FSLR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SHLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: ENPH as "Hold", SEDG as "Hold", FSLR as "Buy", ARRY as "Buy", SHLS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.4% upside for SHLS (target: $10) vs -9.1% for SEDG (target: $35).

MetricENPH logoENPHEnphase Energy, I…SEDG logoSEDGSolarEdge Technol…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.ARRY logoARRYArray Technologie…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$43.48$35.09$264.13$9.17$9.83
# AnalystsCovering analysts5548732823
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises13
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.8%0.0%+0.1%0.0%+0.0%
SHLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

FSLR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ARRY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).

Best OverallFirst Solar, Inc. (FSLR)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ENPH vs SEDG vs FSLR vs ARRY vs SHLS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ENPH or SEDG or FSLR or ARRY or SHLS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Array Technologies, Inc.

(ARRY) is the stronger pick with 40. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 7% for Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH). First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) offers the better valuation at 15. 1x trailing P/E (12. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) a "Buy" — based on 73 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ENPH or SEDG or FSLR or ARRY or SHLS?

On trailing P/E, First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) is the cheapest at 15. 1x versus Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. at 39. 2x. On forward P/E, Array Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First Solar, Inc. wins at 0. 39x versus Enphase Energy, Inc. 's 2. 79x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ENPH or SEDG or FSLR or ARRY or SHLS?

Over the past 5 years, First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) delivered a total return of +187. 6%, compared to -82. 5% for SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. (SEDG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENPH returned +1738% versus ARRY's -77. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ENPH or SEDG or FSLR or ARRY or SHLS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 39β versus Array Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 32β — meaning ARRY is approximately 67% more volatile than FSLR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 3% for Array Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ENPH or SEDG or FSLR or ARRY or SHLS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Array Technologies, Inc.

(ARRY) is pulling ahead at 40. 2% versus 10. 7% for Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 78. 2% year-over-year, compared to 18. 2% for First Solar, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FSLR leads at 25. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ENPH or SEDG or FSLR or ARRY or SHLS?

First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 3% net margin versus -34. 2% for SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FSLR leads at 32. 3% versus -24. 1% for SEDG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ENPH leads at 46. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ENPH or SEDG or FSLR or ARRY or SHLS more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 39x versus Enphase Energy, Inc. 's 2. 79x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Array Technologies, Inc. (ARRY) trades at 11. 7x forward P/E versus 610. 9x for SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. — 599. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHLS: 25. 4% to $9. 83.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ENPH or SEDG or FSLR or ARRY or SHLS?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is ENPH or SEDG or FSLR or ARRY or SHLS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Enphase Energy, Inc.

(ENPH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1738% 10Y return). Array Technologies, Inc. (ARRY) carries a higher beta of 2. 32 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ENPH: +1738%, ARRY: -77. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ENPH and SEDG and FSLR and ARRY and SHLS?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ENPH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SEDG is a small-cap high-growth stock; FSLR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ARRY is a small-cap high-growth stock; SHLS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ENPH

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SEDG

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 20%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FSLR

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ARRY

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SHLS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 37%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ENPH and SEDG and FSLR and ARRY and SHLS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ENPH: -20.6% · SEDG: 41.5%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.