Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ENSC vs AVDL vs COLL vs NKTR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Biotechnology
ENSC vs AVDL vs COLL vs NKTR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1M | $2.10B | $1.27B | $1.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $249M | $796M | $55M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $-278K | $75M | $-164M |
| Gross Margin | -93.4% | 94.5% | 60.7% | 99.6% |
| Operating Margin | -245.9% | 1.8% | 23.7% | -237.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 28.3x | 5.1x | — |
| Total Debt | $302K | $2M | $941M | $149M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $51M | $251M | $15M |
ENSC vs AVDL vs COLL vs NKTR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ensysce Biosciences… (ENSC) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Avadel Pharmaceutic… (AVDL) | 100 | 266.7 | +166.7% |
| Collegium Pharmaceu… (COLL) | 100 | 171.4 | +71.4% |
| Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) | 100 | 25.2 | -74.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ENSC vs AVDL vs COLL vs NKTR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ENSC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.02, yield 100.0%
- 100.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
AVDL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 5.0%, EPS growth 74.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.23, Low D/E 2.3%, current ratio 2.75x
- Beta 0.23, current ratio 2.75x
- 5.0% revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9%
COLL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 153.1% 10Y total return vs AVDL's 113.0%
- Better valuation composite
- 9.4% margin vs NKTR's -297.1%
- 4.6% ROA vs ENSC's -231.5%
NKTR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +8.2% vs ENSC's -82.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.0% revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.4% margin vs NKTR's -297.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.23 vs NKTR's 1.85, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.2% vs ENSC's -82.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.6% ROA vs ENSC's -231.5% |
ENSC vs AVDL vs COLL vs NKTR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ENSC vs AVDL vs COLL vs NKTR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
COLL leads in 2 of 6 categories
ENSC leads 2 • NKTR leads 1 • AVDL leads 1
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COLL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COLL is the larger business by revenue, generating $796M annually — 177.4x ENSC's $4M. COLL is the more profitable business, keeping 9.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NKTR's -3.0%. On growth, AVDL holds the edge at +54.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $249M | $796M | $55M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $8M | $472M | -$130M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | -$278,000 | $75M | -$164M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $35M | $330M | -$209M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -93.4% | +94.5% | +60.7% | +99.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | +1.8% | +23.7% | -2.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | -0.1% | +9.4% | -3.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -159.7% | +14.2% | +41.4% | -3.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -85.6% | +54.9% | +8.9% | -25.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.3% | +100.7% | +4.4% | -4.5% |
Valuation Metrics
ENSC leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $2.1B | $1.3B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$2M | $2.1B | $2.0B | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.08x | -42.43x | 22.73x | -8.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 28.28x | 5.09x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.27x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 4.75x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.23x | 12.44x | 1.63x | 30.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.19x | 27.88x | 5.18x | 15.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 3.89x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
COLL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
COLL delivers a 26.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-4 for ENSC. AVDL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COLL's 3.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ENSC scores 6/9 vs NKTR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.4% | -0.3% | +26.7% | -4.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.3% | -0.2% | +4.6% | -62.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -76.3% | +14.0% | -57.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.9% | -34.9% | +15.8% | -55.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 0.02x | 3.12x | 1.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | -$50M | $689M | $134M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $51M | $251M | $15M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $301,660 | $2M | $941M | $149M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -455.37x | 0.66x | 1.80x | -4.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AVDL five years ago would be worth $26,487 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for ENSC. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +818.2% total return vs ENSC's -82.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 93.3% vs ENSC's -80.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -60.6% | +0.6% | -13.6% | +92.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -82.0% | +128.5% | +45.4% | +818.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.3% | +45.8% | +67.9% | +621.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +164.9% | +71.0% | -72.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +113.0% | +153.1% | -59.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -80.7% | +13.4% | +18.9% | +93.3% |
Risk & Volatility
AVDL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AVDL is the less volatile stock with a 0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NKTR's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AVDL currently trades 91.8% from its 52-week high vs ENSC's 13.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 0.19x | 0.61x | 1.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.75 | $23.57 | $50.79 | $109.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.33 | $8.44 | $26.72 | $7.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +13.5% | +91.8% | +77.4% | +76.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.6 | 61.8 | 62.4 | 53.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.4M | 0 | 543K | 991K |
Analyst Outlook
ENSC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AVDL as "Buy", COLL as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 76.7% upside for NKTR (target: $147) vs 4.0% for AVDL (target: $23). ENSC is the only dividend payer here at 100.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $22.50 | $58.00 | $147.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 | 12 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $166.00 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.0% | 0.0% |
COLL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ENSC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
ENSC vs AVDL vs COLL vs NKTR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ENSC or AVDL or COLL or NKTR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc (AVDL) is the stronger pick with 504.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. (COLL) offers the better valuation at 22. 7x trailing P/E (5. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc (AVDL) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ENSC or AVDL or COLL or NKTR?
On forward P/E, Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 5. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ENSC or AVDL or COLL or NKTR?
Over the past 5 years, Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc (AVDL) delivered a total return of +164.
9%, compared to -100. 0% for Ensysce Biosciences, Inc. (ENSC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: COLL returned +143. 2% versus ENSC's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ENSC or AVDL or COLL or NKTR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc (AVDL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
19β versus Nektar Therapeutics's 1. 80β — meaning NKTR is approximately 861% more volatile than AVDL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc (AVDL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 3% for Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ENSC or AVDL or COLL or NKTR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc (AVDL) is pulling ahead at 504.
8% versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc grew EPS 74. 5% year-over-year, compared to -12. 1% for Nektar Therapeutics. Over a 3-year CAGR, COLL leads at 18. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ENSC or AVDL or COLL or NKTR?
Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.
(COLL) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 1% net margin versus -297. 1% for Nektar Therapeutics — meaning it keeps 8. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: COLL leads at 24. 0% versus -236. 8% for NKTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NKTR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ENSC or AVDL or COLL or NKTR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.
(COLL) trades at 5. 1x forward P/E versus 28. 3x for Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc — 23. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NKTR: 76. 7% to $147. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — ENSC or AVDL or COLL or NKTR?
In this comparison, ENSC (100.
0% yield) pays a dividend. AVDL, COLL, NKTR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ENSC or AVDL or COLL or NKTR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc (AVDL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
19), +113. 0% 10Y return). Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AVDL: +113. 0%, NKTR: -59. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ENSC and AVDL and COLL and NKTR?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ENSC is a small-cap high-growth stock; AVDL is a small-cap high-growth stock; COLL is a small-cap high-growth stock; NKTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ENSC pays a dividend while AVDL, COLL, NKTR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.