Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ENSC vs PCRX vs PRGO vs PAHC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
ENSC vs PCRX vs PRGO vs PAHC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic |
| Market Cap | $1M | $930M | $1.61B | $1.75B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $735M | $4.18B | $1.46B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $9M | $-1.82B | $92M |
| Gross Margin | -93.4% | 60.2% | 34.2% | 31.9% |
| Operating Margin | -245.9% | 3.4% | -4.1% | 11.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 8.1x | 5.5x | 13.1x |
| Total Debt | $302K | $454M | $3.97B | $762M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $159M | $532M | $68M |
ENSC vs PCRX vs PRGO vs PAHC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ensysce Biosciences… (ENSC) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Pacira BioSciences,… (PCRX) | 100 | 52.7 | -47.3% |
| Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) | 100 | 21.4 | -78.6% |
| Phibro Animal Healt… (PAHC) | 100 | 152.7 | +52.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ENSC vs PCRX vs PRGO vs PAHC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ENSC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.02, yield 100.0%
- Rev growth 133.5%, EPS growth 2.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.8%
- 133.5% revenue growth vs PRGO's -2.8%
- 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PRGO's 9.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
PCRX is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 65.6%, current ratio 4.54x
- Beta 0.47, current ratio 4.54x
- Beta 0.47 vs PAHC's 1.38, lower leverage
PRGO is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (5.5x vs 13.1x)
PAHC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 128.6% 10Y total return vs PCRX's -51.2%
- 6.3% margin vs ENSC's -244.5%
- +125.1% vs ENSC's -82.0%
- 6.7% ROA vs ENSC's -231.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 133.5% revenue growth vs PRGO's -2.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.5x vs 13.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.3% margin vs ENSC's -244.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs PAHC's 1.38, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PRGO's 9.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +125.1% vs ENSC's -82.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.7% ROA vs ENSC's -231.5% |
ENSC vs PCRX vs PRGO vs PAHC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ENSC vs PCRX vs PRGO vs PAHC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PAHC leads in 3 of 6 categories
PRGO leads 1 • PCRX leads 1 • ENSC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PAHC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRGO is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.2B annually — 931.0x ENSC's $4M. PAHC is the more profitable business, keeping 6.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ENSC's -2.4%. On growth, PAHC holds the edge at +20.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $735M | $4.2B | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $95M | $58M | $220M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | $9M | -$1.8B | $92M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $133M | $108M | $47M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -93.4% | +60.2% | +34.2% | +31.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | +3.4% | -4.1% | +11.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | +1.3% | -43.5% | +6.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -159.7% | +18.1% | +2.6% | +3.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -85.6% | +5.0% | -7.2% | +20.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.3% | -30.0% | -56.4% | +7.4% |
Valuation Metrics
PRGO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 36.3x trailing earnings, PAHC trades at a 75% valuation discount to PCRX's 147.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRGO's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PAHC's 15.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $930M | $1.6B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$2M | $1.2B | $5.1B | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.08x | 147.75x | -1.14x | 36.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.13x | 5.53x | 13.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 4.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.86x | 7.42x | 15.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.23x | 1.28x | 0.38x | 1.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.19x | 1.54x | 0.55x | 6.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 6.80x | 11.12x | 41.82x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PAHC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PAHC delivers a 30.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-4 for ENSC. ENSC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PAHC's 2.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PCRX scores 9/9 vs PRGO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.4% | +1.3% | -50.7% | +30.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.3% | +0.7% | -19.8% | +6.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +2.3% | +3.7% | +9.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.9% | +2.8% | +4.3% | +12.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 0.66x | 1.35x | 2.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $296M | $3.4B | $694M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $159M | $532M | $68M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $301,660 | $454M | $4.0B | $762M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -455.37x | 2.37x | -7.20x | 3.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PAHC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PAHC five years ago would be worth $16,597 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for ENSC. Over the past 12 months, PAHC leads with a +125.1% total return vs ENSC's -82.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PAHC at 45.9% vs ENSC's -80.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -60.6% | -3.4% | -13.5% | +16.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -82.0% | -6.1% | -51.2% | +125.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.3% | -44.1% | -58.1% | +210.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -62.6% | -60.1% | +66.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -51.2% | -77.7% | +128.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -80.7% | -17.6% | -25.2% | +45.9% |
Risk & Volatility
PCRX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PCRX is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PAHC's 1.38 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PCRX currently trades 85.5% from its 52-week high vs ENSC's 13.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 0.41x | 1.21x | 1.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.75 | $27.64 | $28.44 | $60.08 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.33 | $18.80 | $9.23 | $19.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +13.5% | +85.5% | +41.2% | +71.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.6 | 45.9 | 60.9 | 60.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.4M | 695K | 3.4M | 302K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ENSC and PRGO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PCRX as "Hold", PRGO as "Hold", PAHC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 208.9% upside for PRGO (target: $36) vs 13.5% for PAHC (target: $49). For income investors, ENSC offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs PAHC's 1.11%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $29.50 | $36.20 | $49.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 36 | 36 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | — | +9.8% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 10 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $166.00 | — | $1.15 | $0.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +16.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PAHC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRGO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ENSC vs PCRX vs PRGO vs PAHC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ENSC or PCRX or PRGO or PAHC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ensysce Biosciences, Inc.
(ENSC) is the stronger pick with 133. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 8% for Perrigo Company plc (PRGO). Phibro Animal Health Corporation (PAHC) offers the better valuation at 36. 3x trailing P/E (13. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Phibro Animal Health Corporation (PAHC) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ENSC or PCRX or PRGO or PAHC?
On trailing P/E, Phibro Animal Health Corporation (PAHC) is the cheapest at 36.
3x versus Pacira BioSciences, Inc. at 147. 8x. On forward P/E, Perrigo Company plc is actually cheaper at 5. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ENSC or PCRX or PRGO or PAHC?
Over the past 5 years, Phibro Animal Health Corporation (PAHC) delivered a total return of +66.
0%, compared to -100. 0% for Ensysce Biosciences, Inc. (ENSC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PAHC returned +113. 5% versus ENSC's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ENSC or PCRX or PRGO or PAHC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pacira BioSciences, Inc.
(PCRX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 41β versus Phibro Animal Health Corporation's 1. 35β — meaning PAHC is approximately 228% more volatile than PCRX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ensysce Biosciences, Inc. (ENSC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 3% for Phibro Animal Health Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ENSC or PCRX or PRGO or PAHC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ensysce Biosciences, Inc.
(ENSC) is pulling ahead at 133. 5% versus -2. 8% for Perrigo Company plc (PRGO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Phibro Animal Health Corporation grew EPS 1883% year-over-year, compared to -723. 2% for Perrigo Company plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, ENSC leads at 13. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ENSC or PCRX or PRGO or PAHC?
Phibro Animal Health Corporation (PAHC) is the more profitable company, earning 3.
7% net margin versus -153. 3% for Ensysce Biosciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PAHC leads at 8. 5% versus -129. 2% for ENSC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PCRX leads at 79. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ENSC or PCRX or PRGO or PAHC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) trades at 5.
5x forward P/E versus 13. 1x for Phibro Animal Health Corporation — 7. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRGO: 208. 9% to $36. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — ENSC or PCRX or PRGO or PAHC?
In this comparison, ENSC (100.
0% yield), PRGO (9. 8% yield), PAHC (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. PCRX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ENSC or PCRX or PRGO or PAHC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pacira BioSciences, Inc.
(PCRX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 41)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PCRX: -52. 2%, PRGO: -77. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ENSC and PCRX and PRGO and PAHC?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ENSC is a small-cap high-growth stock; PCRX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRGO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PAHC is a small-cap high-growth stock. ENSC, PRGO, PAHC pay a dividend while PCRX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.