EONR
EON Resources Inc.
Oil & Gas Energy
Market Cap$36M
5Y Perf.-93.4%
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
EONR vs XOM vs SLB vs HAL vs BKR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
Oil & Gas Integrated
Market Cap$647.40B
5Y Perf.+79.2%
SLB
SLB N.V.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$83.69B
5Y Perf.+42.9%
HAL
Halliburton Company
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$34.48B
5Y Perf.+18.8%
BKR
Baker Hughes Company
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$64.08B
5Y Perf.+124.6%
EONR vs XOM vs SLB vs HAL vs BKR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | EONR | XOM | SLB | HAL | BKR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Energy | Oil & Gas Integrated | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $36M | $647.40B | $83.69B | $34.48B | $64.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17M | $323.90B | $35.71B | $22.17B | $27.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $28.84B | $3.35B | $1.54B | $3.12B |
| Gross Margin | 79.7% | 21.7% | 18.2% | 15.3% | 23.6% |
| Operating Margin | -31.7% | 10.5% | 15.3% | 11.3% | 25.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 15.1x | 21.2x | 17.8x | 27.0x |
| Total Debt | $43M | $43.54B | $12.31B | $8.13B | $7.14B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $10.68B | $3.04B | $2.21B | $3.71B |
EONR vs XOM vs SLB vs HAL vs BKR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
EONR
XOM
SLB
HAL
BKR
| Stock | Apr 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| EON Resources Inc. (EONR) | 100 | 6.6 | -93.4% |
| Exxon Mobil Corpora… (XOM) | 100 | 179.2 | +79.2% |
| SLB N.V. (SLB) | 100 | 142.9 | +42.9% |
| Halliburton Company (HAL) | 100 | 118.8 | +18.8% |
| Baker Hughes Company (BKR) | 100 | 224.6 | +124.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EONR vs XOM vs SLB vs HAL vs BKR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: XOM and HAL are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Halliburton Company is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. BKR and EONR also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
EONR
EON Resources Inc.
The Quality Compounder
EONR is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 15.4% margin vs HAL's 6.9%
Best for: quality
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
The Income Pick
XOM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability.
- Dividend streak 26 yrs, beta -0.20, yield 2.6%
- Lower P/E (15.1x vs 27.0x)
- 2.6% yield, 26-year raise streak, vs HAL's 1.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: income & stability
SLB
SLB N.V.
The Energy Pick
Among these 5 stocks, SLB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
Best for: energy exposure
HAL
Halliburton Company
The Defensive Pick
HAL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.48, Low D/E 77.4%, current ratio 2.04x
- Beta 0.48, yield 1.7%, current ratio 2.04x
- Beta 0.48 vs SLB's 0.83
- +97.7% vs XOM's +44.5%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
BKR
Baker Hughes Company
The Growth Play
BKR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -0.3%, EPS growth -12.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.4%
- 179.9% 10Y total return vs XOM's 108.8%
- -0.3% revenue growth vs EONR's -24.4%
- 7.3% ROA vs EONR's 2.7%, ROIC 12.7% vs -4.1%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | BKR | -0.3% revenue growth vs EONR's -24.4% |
| Value | XOM | Lower P/E (15.1x vs 27.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | EONR | 15.4% margin vs HAL's 6.9% |
| Stability / Safety | HAL | Beta 0.48 vs SLB's 0.83 |
| Dividends | XOM | 2.6% yield, 26-year raise streak, vs HAL's 1.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) |
| Momentum (1Y) | HAL | +97.7% vs XOM's +44.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | BKR | 7.3% ROA vs EONR's 2.7%, ROIC 12.7% vs -4.1% |
EONR vs XOM vs SLB vs HAL vs BKR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
EONR vs XOM vs SLB vs HAL vs BKR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLBKRLAGGINGHAL
Who Leads Where
BKR leads in 2 of 6 categories
XOM leads 1 • EONR leads 0 • SLB leads 0 • HAL leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓HALHalliburton Company
0leads
SLBSLB N.V.
0leads
EONREON Resources Inc.
0leads
XOMExxon Mobil Corporati…
1leads
BKRBaker Hughes Company
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs XOMvs EONRMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
BKR4/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
BKR3/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
XOM2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — EONR and SLB and BKR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $323.9B annually — 18708.6x EONR's $17M. EONR is the more profitable business, keeping 15.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HAL's 6.9%. On growth, SLB holds the edge at +5.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | EONREON Resources Inc. | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… | SLBSLB N.V. | HALHalliburton Compa… | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $17M | $323.9B | $35.7B | $22.2B | $27.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | $59.9B | $7.4B | $3.4B | $4.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | $28.8B | $3.4B | $1.5B | $3.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$27M | $23.6B | $4.8B | $1.7B | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +79.7% | +21.7% | +18.2% | +15.3% | +23.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -31.7% | +10.5% | +15.3% | +11.3% | +25.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.4% | +8.9% | +9.4% | +6.9% | +11.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -153.4% | +7.3% | +13.4% | +7.6% | +9.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.0% | -1.3% | +5.0% | -0.3% | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +114.9% | -11.0% | -31.2% | +129.2% | +132.5% |
Evenly matched — EONR and SLB and BKR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — EONR and XOM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.8x trailing earnings, XOM trades at a 17% valuation discount to HAL's 27.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, XOM's 11.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BKR's 14.2x.
| Metric | EONREON Resources Inc. | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… | SLBSLB N.V. | HALHalliburton Compa… | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $36M | $647.4B | $83.7B | $34.5B | $64.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $76M | $680.3B | $93.0B | $40.4B | $67.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.42x | 22.80x | 23.72x | 27.53x | 24.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.14x | 21.20x | 17.76x | 26.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.35x | 12.62x | 11.90x | 14.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.78x | 2.00x | 2.34x | 1.55x | 2.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.14x | 2.47x | 3.04x | 3.30x | 3.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 287.37x | 27.42x | 17.45x | 20.62x | 25.26x |
Evenly matched — EONR and XOM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BKR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BKR delivers a 16.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $7 for EONR. XOM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EONR's 1.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BKR scores 6/9 vs XOM's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | EONREON Resources Inc. | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… | SLBSLB N.V. | HALHalliburton Compa… | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.7% | +10.7% | +13.9% | +14.6% | +16.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.7% | +6.4% | +6.5% | +6.1% | +7.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.1% | +8.6% | +12.1% | +10.2% | +12.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.2% | +8.9% | +14.3% | +11.6% | +13.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.56x | 0.16x | 0.45x | 0.77x | 0.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $40M | $32.9B | $9.3B | $5.9B | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $10.7B | $3.0B | $2.2B | $3.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $43M | $43.5B | $12.3B | $8.1B | $7.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.84x | 69.44x | 9.40x | 9.19x | 9.68x |
BKR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BKR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XOM five years ago would be worth $28,075 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $655 for EONR. Over the past 12 months, HAL leads with a +97.7% total return vs XOM's +44.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BKR at 34.2% vs EONR's -60.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | EONREON Resources Inc. | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… | SLBSLB N.V. | HALHalliburton Compa… | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +69.3% | +25.4% | +39.4% | +40.1% | +38.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +72.8% | +44.5% | +58.0% | +97.7% | +73.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.8% | +56.5% | +32.4% | +48.8% | +141.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.5% | +180.7% | +83.8% | +91.1% | +174.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.5% | +108.8% | -7.0% | +17.3% | +179.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -60.4% | +16.1% | +9.8% | +14.2% | +34.2% |
BKR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EONR and SLB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EONR is the less volatile stock with a -2.59 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SLB's 0.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SLB currently trades 97.5% from its 52-week high vs EONR's 41.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | EONREON Resources Inc. | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… | SLBSLB N.V. | HALHalliburton Compa… | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -2.59x | -0.20x | 0.83x | 0.48x | 0.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.58 | $176.41 | $57.20 | $42.46 | $70.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.27 | $101.19 | $31.64 | $19.38 | $35.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +41.6% | +86.6% | +97.5% | +97.2% | +91.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.5 | 49.8 | 57.0 | 56.7 | 52.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 27.3M | 17.7M | 15.3M | 14.5M | 8.7M |
Evenly matched — EONR and SLB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
XOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: XOM as "Hold", SLB as "Buy", HAL as "Buy", BKR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.3% upside for BKR (target: $73) vs -4.0% for HAL (target: $40). For income investors, XOM offers the higher dividend yield at 2.62% vs BKR's 1.42%.
| Metric | EONREON Resources Inc. | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… | SLBSLB N.V. | HALHalliburton Compa… | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $161.08 | $58.66 | $39.64 | $73.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 55 | 66 | 64 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.6% | +1.9% | +1.7% | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 26 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $4.00 | $1.08 | $0.69 | $0.92 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.1% | +2.9% | +2.9% | +0.6% |
XOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
BKR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). XOM leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 3 tied.
Best OverallBaker Hughes Company (BKR)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
EONR vs XOM vs SLB vs HAL vs BKR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EONR or XOM or SLB or HAL or BKR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Baker Hughes Company (BKR) is the stronger pick with -0.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 4% for EON Resources Inc. (EONR). Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) offers the better valuation at 22. 8x trailing P/E (15. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SLB N. V. (SLB) a "Buy" — based on 66 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EONR or XOM or SLB or HAL or BKR?
On trailing P/E, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the cheapest at 22.
8x versus Halliburton Company at 27. 5x. On forward P/E, Exxon Mobil Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EONR or XOM or SLB or HAL or BKR?
Over the past 5 years, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) delivered a total return of +180.
7%, compared to -93. 5% for EON Resources Inc. (EONR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BKR returned +179. 9% versus EONR's -93. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EONR or XOM or SLB or HAL or BKR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), EON Resources Inc.
(EONR) is the lower-risk stock at -2. 59β versus SLB N. V. 's 0. 83β — meaning SLB is approximately -132% more volatile than EONR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 156% for EON Resources Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EONR or XOM or SLB or HAL or BKR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Baker Hughes Company (BKR) is pulling ahead at -0.
3% versus -24. 4% for EON Resources Inc. (EONR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Baker Hughes Company grew EPS -12. 8% year-over-year, compared to -105. 2% for EON Resources Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BKR leads at 9. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EONR or XOM or SLB or HAL or BKR?
SLB N.
V. (SLB) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 4% net margin versus -44. 8% for EON Resources Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SLB leads at 15. 3% versus -19. 0% for EONR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EONR leads at 79. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EONR or XOM or SLB or HAL or BKR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) trades at 15.
1x forward P/E versus 27. 0x for Baker Hughes Company — 11. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BKR: 13. 3% to $73. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — EONR or XOM or SLB or HAL or BKR?
In this comparison, XOM (2.
6% yield), SLB (1. 9% yield), HAL (1. 7% yield), BKR (1. 4% yield) pay a dividend. EONR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is EONR or XOM or SLB or HAL or BKR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, EON Resources Inc.
(EONR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -2. 59)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EONR: -93. 5%, SLB: -7. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EONR and XOM and SLB and HAL and BKR?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
XOM, SLB, HAL, BKR pay a dividend while EONR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(EONR: -16.0% · XOM: -1.3%)Net Margin>
%
(EONR: 15.4% · XOM: 8.9%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.