REIT - Diversified
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
EPRT vs NNN vs ADC vs NTST vs PINE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
EPRT vs NNN vs ADC vs NTST vs PINE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $6.79B | $8.51B | $9.19B | $1.72B | $279M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $593M | $936M | $750M | $176M | $65M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $257M | $387M | $220M | $185K | $-415K |
| Gross Margin | 84.7% | 81.4% | 87.6% | 92.4% | -4.1% |
| Operating Margin | 65.0% | 63.3% | 48.0% | 27.7% | 28.0% |
| Forward P/E | 24.1x | 21.8x | 39.0x | 65.4x | 58.8x |
| Total Debt | $2.52B | $4.82B | $3.35B | $0.00 | $394M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $60M | $5M | $16M | $14M | $5M |
EPRT vs NNN vs ADC vs NTST vs PINE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Essential Propertie… (EPRT) | 100 | 185.0 | +85.0% |
| NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) | 100 | 126.2 | +26.2% |
| Agree Realty Corpor… (ADC) | 100 | 114.3 | +14.3% |
| NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) | 100 | 112.2 | +12.2% |
| Alpine Income Prope… (PINE) | 100 | 134.3 | +34.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EPRT vs NNN vs ADC vs NTST vs PINE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EPRT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 189.7% 10Y total return vs ADC's 137.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.01, Low D/E 59.9%, current ratio 6.13x
- PEG 1.01 vs NNN's 1.95
- Beta 0.01, yield 3.7%, current ratio 6.13x
NNN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 0.15, yield 5.3%
- Lower P/E (21.8x vs 58.8x)
- 5.3% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs NTST's 4.1%
- 4.1% ROA vs PINE's -0.1%, ROIC 4.8% vs 2.2%
Among these 5 stocks, ADC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NTST ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 30.0%, EPS growth 150.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.2%
- 30.0% FFO/revenue growth vs NNN's 6.6%
PINE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +35.5% vs EPRT's +2.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.0% FFO/revenue growth vs NNN's 6.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (21.8x vs 58.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 43.3% margin vs PINE's -0.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs PINE's 0.33, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.3% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs NTST's 4.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.5% vs EPRT's +2.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.1% ROA vs PINE's -0.1%, ROIC 4.8% vs 2.2% |
EPRT vs NNN vs ADC vs NTST vs PINE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
EPRT vs NNN vs ADC vs NTST vs PINE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PINE leads in 2 of 6 categories
NNN leads 2 • EPRT leads 0 • ADC leads 0 • NTST leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — EPRT and NTST and PINE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NNN is the larger business by revenue, generating $936M annually — 14.5x PINE's $65M. EPRT is the more profitable business, keeping 43.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PINE's -0.6%. On growth, PINE holds the edge at +29.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $593M | $936M | $750M | $176M | $65M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $548M | $867M | $638M | $133M | $45M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $257M | $387M | $220M | $185,000 | -$415,000 |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$151M | $464M | $110M | $106M | -$46M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +84.7% | +81.4% | +87.6% | +92.4% | -4.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +65.0% | +63.3% | +48.0% | +27.7% | +28.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +43.3% | +41.4% | +29.3% | +0.1% | -0.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -25.5% | +49.6% | +14.7% | +59.9% | -71.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.1% | +4.1% | +18.7% | +27.7% | +29.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.4% | -2.0% | +19.0% | +110.6% | +185.7% |
Valuation Metrics
PINE leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.6x trailing earnings, NNN trades at a 92% valuation discount to NTST's 257.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), EPRT offers better value at 1.03x vs ADC's 113.96x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.8B | $8.5B | $9.2B | $1.7B | $279M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.3B | $13.3B | $12.5B | $1.7B | $669M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.53x | 21.60x | 43.22x | 257.13x | -88.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.08x | 21.78x | 39.03x | 65.45x | 58.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.03x | 1.94x | 113.96x | 4.40x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.93x | 15.89x | 20.33x | 12.47x | 14.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 12.08x | 9.18x | 12.79x | 8.81x | 4.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.50x | 1.91x | 1.36x | 1.19x | 1.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.82x | 12.75x | 18.23x | 15.68x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NNN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NNN delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-0 for PINE. ADC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.53x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PINE's 1.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTST scores 6/9 vs PINE's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.3% | +8.8% | +3.7% | +0.0% | -0.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.8% | +4.1% | +2.3% | +0.0% | -0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.4% | +4.8% | +2.8% | +2.1% | +2.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.8% | +6.4% | +3.8% | +2.1% | +2.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.60x | 1.09x | 0.53x | — | 1.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.5B | $4.8B | $3.3B | -$14M | $390M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $60M | $5M | $16M | $14M | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.5B | $4.8B | $3.4B | $0 | $394M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.17x | 2.93x | 2.54x | — | 0.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PINE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EPRT five years ago would be worth $14,420 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,752 for NTST. Over the past 12 months, PINE leads with a +35.5% total return vs EPRT's +2.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PINE at 13.3% vs NNN's 4.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.5% | +16.1% | +7.5% | +17.0% | +17.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.3% | +12.1% | +3.9% | +33.5% | +35.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +38.0% | +15.6% | +26.4% | +28.2% | +45.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.2% | +17.7% | +30.5% | +17.5% | +41.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +189.7% | +39.7% | +137.5% | +41.9% | +37.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.3% | +4.9% | +8.1% | +8.6% | +13.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NNN and ADC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ADC is the less volatile stock with a -0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PINE's 0.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NNN currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs EPRT's 90.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.01x | 0.15x | -0.14x | 0.05x | 0.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.73 | $46.03 | $82.08 | $21.30 | $20.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $28.95 | $38.90 | $69.56 | $15.24 | $13.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.4% | +97.1% | +93.2% | +96.6% | +93.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.5 | 55.7 | 43.2 | 52.4 | 53.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.0M | 1.4M | 1.1M | 1.2M | 175K |
Analyst Outlook
NNN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EPRT as "Buy", NNN as "Hold", ADC as "Buy", NTST as "Buy", PINE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.2% upside for EPRT (target: $37) vs 3.0% for NNN (target: $46). For income investors, NNN offers the higher dividend yield at 5.27% vs PINE's 0.18%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $36.50 | $46.06 | $83.50 | $22.03 | $20.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 29 | 32 | 18 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.7% | +5.3% | +4.0% | +4.1% | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.16 | $2.36 | $3.06 | $0.83 | $0.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% | +0.0% | +3.2% |
PINE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). NNN leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
EPRT vs NNN vs ADC vs NTST vs PINE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EPRT or NNN or ADC or NTST or PINE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is the stronger pick with 30. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 6% for NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN). NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) offers the better valuation at 21. 6x trailing P/E (21. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. (EPRT) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EPRT or NNN or ADC or NTST or PINE?
On trailing P/E, NNN REIT, Inc.
(NNN) is the cheapest at 21. 6x versus NETSTREIT Corp. at 257. 1x. On forward P/E, NNN REIT, Inc. is actually cheaper at 21. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. wins at 1. 01x versus Agree Realty Corporation's 113. 96x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EPRT or NNN or ADC or NTST or PINE?
Over the past 5 years, Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
(EPRT) delivered a total return of +44. 2%, compared to +17. 5% for NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EPRT returned +189. 7% versus PINE's +37. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EPRT or NNN or ADC or NTST or PINE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
14β versus Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. 's 0. 33β — meaning PINE is approximately -339% more volatile than ADC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 53% versus 131% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EPRT or NNN or ADC or NTST or PINE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is pulling ahead at 30. 0% versus 6. 6% for NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NETSTREIT Corp. grew EPS 150. 0% year-over-year, compared to -257. 1% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTST leads at 28. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EPRT or NNN or ADC or NTST or PINE?
Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
(EPRT) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 0% net margin versus -4. 4% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 45. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EPRT leads at 64. 5% versus 25. 7% for NTST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTST leads at 99. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EPRT or NNN or ADC or NTST or PINE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. (EPRT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 01x versus Agree Realty Corporation's 113. 96x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) trades at 21. 8x forward P/E versus 65. 4x for NETSTREIT Corp. — 43. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EPRT: 16. 2% to $36. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — EPRT or NNN or ADC or NTST or PINE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) offers the highest yield at 5. 3%, versus 0. 2% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE).
09Is EPRT or NNN or ADC or NTST or PINE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
14), 4. 0% yield, +137. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ADC: +137. 5%, PINE: +37. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EPRT and NNN and ADC and NTST and PINE?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: EPRT is a small-cap high-growth stock; NNN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ADC is a small-cap high-growth stock; NTST is a small-cap high-growth stock; PINE is a small-cap high-growth stock. EPRT, NNN, ADC, NTST pay a dividend while PINE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.