REIT - Specialty
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
EQIX vs CCI vs AMT vs DLR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Specialty
REIT - Specialty
REIT - Office
EQIX vs CCI vs AMT vs DLR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Office |
| Market Cap | $107.26B | $39.38B | $83.94B | $68.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9.46B | $4.21B | $10.82B | $6.19B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.42B | $1.06B | $2.88B | $1.31B |
| Gross Margin | 51.3% | 65.7% | 73.4% | 40.0% |
| Operating Margin | 20.8% | 48.0% | 44.2% | 13.7% |
| Forward P/E | 64.2x | 43.5x | 27.5x | 98.7x |
| Total Debt | $22.73B | $29.57B | $44.96B | $24.18B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.73B | $269M | $1.47B | $3.45B |
EQIX vs CCI vs AMT vs DLR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equinix, Inc. (EQIX) | 100 | 155.9 | +55.9% |
| Crown Castle Inc. (CCI) | 100 | 52.4 | -47.6% |
| American Tower Corp… (AMT) | 100 | 69.8 | -30.2% |
| Digital Realty Trus… (DLR) | 100 | 139.1 | +39.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EQIX vs CCI vs AMT vs DLR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EQIX has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 259.0% 10Y total return vs DLR's 165.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.42, current ratio 1.32x
- PEG 2.39 vs AMT's 3.77
- Lower P/E (64.2x vs 98.7x), PEG 2.39 vs 3.40
CCI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.26, yield 5.3%
- Beta 0.26, yield 5.3%, current ratio 0.26x
- Beta 0.26 vs DLR's 0.77
- 5.3% yield, vs AMT's 3.7%
AMT is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.
- 26.6% margin vs EQIX's 15.0%
- 4.5% ROA vs DLR's 2.7%, ROIC 6.9% vs 1.2%
DLR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.0%, EPS growth 122.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.2%
- 10.0% FFO/revenue growth vs CCI's -35.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.0% FFO/revenue growth vs CCI's -35.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (64.2x vs 98.7x), PEG 2.39 vs 3.40 | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.6% margin vs EQIX's 15.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.26 vs DLR's 0.77 | |
| Dividends | 5.3% yield, vs AMT's 3.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.4% vs AMT's -16.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.5% ROA vs DLR's 2.7%, ROIC 6.9% vs 1.2% |
EQIX vs CCI vs AMT vs DLR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EQIX vs CCI vs AMT vs DLR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMT leads in 2 of 6 categories
CCI leads 1 • EQIX leads 1 • DLR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CCI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.8B annually — 2.6x CCI's $4.2B. AMT is the more profitable business, keeping 26.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EQIX's 15.0%. On growth, DLR holds the edge at +19.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9.5B | $4.2B | $10.8B | $6.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.1B | $2.7B | $6.9B | $2.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.4B | $1.1B | $2.9B | $1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $888M | $2.7B | $3.8B | $233M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +51.3% | +65.7% | +73.4% | +40.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.8% | +48.0% | +44.2% | +13.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.0% | +25.1% | +26.6% | +21.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.4% | +64.7% | +34.9% | +3.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.8% | -4.8% | +6.8% | +19.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.0% | +132.1% | +76.9% | -51.0% |
Valuation Metrics
AMT leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 33.4x trailing earnings, AMT trades at a 62% valuation discount to CCI's 88.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DLR offers better value at 1.92x vs AMT's 4.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $107.3B | $39.4B | $83.9B | $68.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $128.3B | $68.7B | $127.4B | $89.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 79.04x | 88.47x | 33.42x | 55.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 64.21x | 43.54x | 27.49x | 98.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.94x | — | 4.58x | 1.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 32.77x | 24.81x | 18.36x | 34.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 11.58x | 9.23x | 7.88x | 11.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.53x | — | 8.16x | 2.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 13.70x | 22.18x | 28.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMT delivers a 27.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $5 for DLR. DLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.97x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMT's 4.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMT scores 7/9 vs CCI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.0% | — | +27.4% | +5.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.6% | +3.4% | +4.5% | +2.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.3% | +5.5% | +6.9% | +1.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.4% | +7.2% | +8.6% | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.60x | — | 4.34x | 0.97x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $21.0B | $29.3B | $43.5B | $20.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.7B | $269M | $1.5B | $3.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $22.7B | $29.6B | $45.0B | $24.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.53x | 2.17x | 3.99x | 3.87x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EQIX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EQIX five years ago would be worth $16,651 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,561 for CCI. Over the past 12 months, EQIX leads with a +26.4% total return vs AMT's -16.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DLR at 30.1% vs CCI's -2.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +43.0% | +2.9% | +4.1% | +29.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +26.4% | -11.2% | -16.4% | +22.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +54.0% | -8.0% | +3.6% | +120.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.5% | -34.4% | -13.3% | +49.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +259.0% | +58.9% | +114.4% | +165.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.5% | -2.8% | +1.2% | +30.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EQIX and AMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMT is the less volatile stock with a -0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DLR's 0.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EQIX currently trades 96.4% from its 52-week high vs AMT's 76.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.42x | 0.26x | -0.04x | 0.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1128.68 | $115.76 | $234.33 | $208.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $710.52 | $75.96 | $165.08 | $146.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.4% | +78.0% | +76.9% | +96.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.7 | 57.0 | 49.2 | 56.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 559K | 2.9M | 2.9M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CCI and AMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EQIX as "Buy", CCI as "Buy", AMT as "Buy", DLR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 20.1% upside for AMT (target: $216) vs 2.7% for EQIX (target: $1117). For income investors, CCI offers the higher dividend yield at 5.27% vs EQIX's 1.74%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1117.40 | $105.40 | $216.33 | $209.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 51 | 46 | 49 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.7% | +5.3% | +3.7% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 9 | 0 | 11 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $18.92 | $4.76 | $6.73 | $4.92 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | +0.4% | 0.0% |
AMT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CCI leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
EQIX vs CCI vs AMT vs DLR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EQIX or CCI or AMT or DLR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Digital Realty Trust, Inc.
(DLR) is the stronger pick with 10. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 1% for Crown Castle Inc. (CCI). American Tower Corporation (AMT) offers the better valuation at 33. 4x trailing P/E (27. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Equinix, Inc. (EQIX) a "Buy" — based on 51 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EQIX or CCI or AMT or DLR?
On trailing P/E, American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the cheapest at 33.
4x versus Crown Castle Inc. at 88. 5x. On forward P/E, American Tower Corporation is actually cheaper at 27. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Equinix, Inc. wins at 2. 39x versus American Tower Corporation's 3. 77x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EQIX or CCI or AMT or DLR?
Over the past 5 years, Equinix, Inc.
(EQIX) delivered a total return of +66. 5%, compared to -34. 4% for Crown Castle Inc. (CCI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EQIX returned +259. 0% versus CCI's +58. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EQIX or CCI or AMT or DLR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
04β versus Digital Realty Trust, Inc. 's 0. 77β — meaning DLR is approximately -2159% more volatile than AMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Digital Realty Trust, Inc. (DLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 97% versus 4% for American Tower Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EQIX or CCI or AMT or DLR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Digital Realty Trust, Inc.
(DLR) is pulling ahead at 10. 0% versus -35. 1% for Crown Castle Inc. (CCI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Digital Realty Trust, Inc. grew EPS 122. 4% year-over-year, compared to 11. 8% for American Tower Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, DLR leads at 9. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EQIX or CCI or AMT or DLR?
American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
8% net margin versus 10. 4% for Crown Castle Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CCI leads at 48. 7% versus 10. 8% for DLR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMT leads at 73. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EQIX or CCI or AMT or DLR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Equinix, Inc. (EQIX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 39x versus American Tower Corporation's 3. 77x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, American Tower Corporation (AMT) trades at 27. 5x forward P/E versus 98. 7x for Digital Realty Trust, Inc. — 71. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMT: 20. 1% to $216. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — EQIX or CCI or AMT or DLR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Crown Castle Inc. (CCI) offers the highest yield at 5. 3%, versus 1. 7% for Equinix, Inc. (EQIX).
09Is EQIX or CCI or AMT or DLR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
04), 3. 7% yield, +114. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMT: +114. 4%, DLR: +165. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EQIX and CCI and AMT and DLR?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: EQIX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CCI is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; AMT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; DLR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.