EQX vs NGD vs KGC vs EGO

For growth investors, New Gold Inc.

(NGD) is the stronger pick with 59. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 22. 1% for Equinox Gold Corp. (EQX). Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO) offers the better valuation at 13. 2x trailing P/E (7. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Equinox Gold Corp. (EQX) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO) is the cheapest at 13.

2x versus New Gold Inc. at 64. 9x. On forward P/E, New Gold Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Eldorado Gold Corporation wins at 0. 29x versus Kinross Gold Corporation's 0. 78x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, New Gold Inc.

(NGD) delivered a total return of +390. 8%, compared to +60. 5% for Equinox Gold Corp. (EQX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KGC returned +499. 1% versus EGO's +58. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

57β versus New Gold Inc. 's 0. 97β — meaning NGD is approximately 72% more volatile than EGO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 30% for Eldorado Gold Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), New Gold Inc.

(NGD) is pulling ahead at 59. 7% versus 22. 1% for Equinox Gold Corp. (EQX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: New Gold Inc. grew EPS 671. 4% year-over-year, compared to -47. 1% for Equinox Gold Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NGD leads at 34. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

New Gold Inc.

(NGD) is the more profitable company, earning 58. 1% net margin versus 12. 2% for Equinox Gold Corp. — meaning it keeps 58. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NGD leads at 44. 4% versus 23. 8% for EQX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NGD leads at 53. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 29x versus Kinross Gold Corporation's 0. 78x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, New Gold Inc. (NGD) trades at 6. 6x forward P/E versus 10. 4x for Equinox Gold Corp. — 3. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EGO: 58. 9% to $52. 67.

In this comparison, KGC (0.

4% yield) pays a dividend. EQX, NGD, EGO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

69), +499. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KGC: +499. 1%, NGD: +110. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.