Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ERJ vs BA vs TDG vs RTX vs LMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
ERJ vs BA vs TDG vs RTX vs LMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $12.00B | $182.12B | $70.14B | $238.07B | $118.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.26B | $92.18B | $9.11B | $90.37B | $75.11B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $315M | $2.27B | $1.97B | $7.26B | $4.79B |
| Gross Margin | 18.2% | 4.8% | 59.0% | 20.2% | 9.8% |
| Operating Margin | 9.2% | -5.9% | 46.5% | 10.4% | 9.9% |
| Forward P/E | 4.4x | 4979.1x | 32.0x | 25.5x | 17.1x |
| Total Debt | $2.60B | $54.43B | $30.03B | $39.51B | $21.70B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.56B | $10.92B | $2.81B | $7.43B | $4.12B |
ERJ vs BA vs TDG vs RTX vs LMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Jan 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Embraer S.A. (ERJ) | 100 | 1191.8 | +1091.8% |
| The Boeing Company (BA) | 100 | 148.9 | +48.9% |
| TransDigm Group Inc… (TDG) | 100 | 313.0 | +213.0% |
| RTX Corporation (RTX) | 100 | 284.3 | +184.3% |
| Lockheed Martin Cor… (LMT) | 100 | 124.5 | +24.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ERJ vs BA vs TDG vs RTX vs LMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ERJ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 21.4%, EPS growth 118.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.0%
- Lower P/E (4.4x vs 25.5x)
BA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 34.5% revenue growth vs LMT's 5.7%
TDG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and defensive.
- 6.0% 10Y total return vs ERJ's 200.2%
- Beta 0.79, yield 13.3%, current ratio 3.21x
- 21.6% margin vs BA's 2.5%
- 13.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs LMT's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
RTX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +40.8% vs TDG's -3.7%
LMT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 2.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, current ratio 1.09x
- Beta 0.12 vs BA's 0.97, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.5% revenue growth vs LMT's 5.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.4x vs 25.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.6% margin vs BA's 2.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs BA's 0.97, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 13.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs LMT's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +40.8% vs TDG's -3.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.6% ROA vs BA's 1.4%, ROIC 20.9% vs -9.5% |
ERJ vs BA vs TDG vs RTX vs LMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ERJ vs BA vs TDG vs RTX vs LMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TDG leads in 1 of 6 categories
LMT leads 1 • ERJ leads 1 • BA leads 0 • RTX leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TDG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BA is the larger business by revenue, generating $92.2B annually — 12.7x ERJ's $7.3B. TDG is the more profitable business, keeping 21.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BA's 2.5%. On growth, ERJ holds the edge at +20.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.3B | $92.2B | $9.1B | $90.4B | $75.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $893M | -$3.4B | $4.6B | $13.8B | $8.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $315M | $2.3B | $2.0B | $7.3B | $4.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $703M | -$1.0B | $1.9B | $8.4B | $5.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.2% | +4.8% | +59.0% | +20.2% | +9.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.2% | -5.9% | +46.5% | +10.4% | +9.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | +2.5% | +21.6% | +8.0% | +6.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | -1.1% | +20.6% | +9.2% | +7.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.4% | +14.0% | +13.9% | +8.7% | +0.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -33.3% | +31.3% | -13.1% | +32.5% | -11.5% |
Valuation Metrics
LMT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.8x trailing earnings, LMT trades at a 74% valuation discount to BA's 93.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ERJ's 14.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TDG's 21.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.0B | $182.1B | $70.1B | $238.1B | $118.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.0B | $225.6B | $97.4B | $270.1B | $135.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 34.08x | 93.16x | 38.72x | 35.64x | 23.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 4.42x | 4979.09x | 32.01x | 25.54x | 17.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.24x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.31x | — | 21.48x | 20.96x | 16.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.88x | 2.04x | 7.94x | 2.69x | 1.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.59x | 32.27x | — | 3.57x | 17.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 29.63x | — | 38.63x | 29.98x | 17.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — ERJ and LMT each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BA delivers a 2.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $9 for ERJ. RTX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.59x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BA's 9.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ERJ scores 8/9 vs LMT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.8% | +2.9% | — | +10.9% | +74.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.6% | +1.4% | +8.6% | +4.3% | +8.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.4% | -9.5% | +20.9% | +6.7% | +23.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.2% | -9.1% | +20.8% | +7.9% | +21.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.78x | 9.97x | — | 0.59x | 3.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.0B | $43.5B | $27.2B | $32.1B | $17.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.6B | $10.9B | $2.8B | $7.4B | $4.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.6B | $54.4B | $30.0B | $39.5B | $21.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.01x | 1.89x | 2.55x | 5.58x | 6.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ERJ leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ERJ five years ago would be worth $51,265 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,811 for BA. Over the past 12 months, RTX leads with a +40.8% total return vs TDG's -3.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ERJ at 71.7% vs BA's 5.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | 0.0% | +1.4% | -8.6% | -5.2% | +3.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.9% | +24.5% | -3.7% | +40.8% | +11.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +405.9% | +17.1% | +86.7% | +93.0% | +22.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +412.7% | -1.9% | +140.2% | +120.1% | +46.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +200.2% | +94.6% | +595.3% | +234.7% | +156.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +71.7% | +5.4% | +23.1% | +24.5% | +6.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ERJ and LMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BA's 0.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ERJ currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs LMT's 74.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 0.97x | 0.79x | 0.51x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $67.44 | $254.35 | $1623.83 | $214.50 | $692.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $45.20 | $176.77 | $1123.61 | $126.03 | $410.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.0% | +90.8% | +76.5% | +82.4% | +74.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.4 | 56.9 | 56.5 | 37.3 | 28.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 525K | 6.5M | 370K | 5.3M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TDG and LMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ERJ as "Buy", BA as "Buy", TDG as "Buy", RTX as "Buy", LMT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.3% upside for TDG (target: $1618) vs -38.8% for ERJ (target: $40). For income investors, TDG offers the higher dividend yield at 13.32% vs BA's 0.19%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $40.04 | $263.67 | $1617.88 | $224.89 | $635.11 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 54 | 39 | 26 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% | +13.3% | +1.5% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 23 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.43 | $165.45 | $2.63 | $13.50 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.7% | +0.0% | +2.5% |
TDG leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). LMT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
ERJ vs BA vs TDG vs RTX vs LMT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ERJ or BA or TDG or RTX or LMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Boeing Company (BA) is the stronger pick with 34.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 7% for Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) offers the better valuation at 23. 8x trailing P/E (17. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Embraer S. A. (ERJ) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ERJ or BA or TDG or RTX or LMT?
On trailing P/E, Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) is the cheapest at 23.
8x versus The Boeing Company at 93. 2x. On forward P/E, Embraer S. A. is actually cheaper at 4. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ERJ or BA or TDG or RTX or LMT?
Over the past 5 years, Embraer S.
A. (ERJ) delivered a total return of +412. 7%, compared to -1. 9% for The Boeing Company (BA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TDG returned +595. 3% versus BA's +94. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ERJ or BA or TDG or RTX or LMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
12β versus The Boeing Company's 0. 97β — meaning BA is approximately 684% more volatile than LMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RTX Corporation (RTX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 59% versus 10% for The Boeing Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ERJ or BA or TDG or RTX or LMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Boeing Company (BA) is pulling ahead at 34.
5% versus 5. 7% for Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Embraer S. A. grew EPS 118. 2% year-over-year, compared to -3. 7% for Lockheed Martin Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TDG leads at 17. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ERJ or BA or TDG or RTX or LMT?
TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
5% net margin versus 2. 5% for The Boeing Company — meaning it keeps 23. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TDG leads at 47. 2% versus -6. 1% for BA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TDG leads at 60. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ERJ or BA or TDG or RTX or LMT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Embraer S.
A. (ERJ) trades at 4. 4x forward P/E versus 4979. 1x for The Boeing Company — 4974. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TDG: 30. 3% to $1617. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — ERJ or BA or TDG or RTX or LMT?
In this comparison, TDG (13.
3% yield), LMT (2. 6% yield), RTX (1. 5% yield), BA (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. ERJ does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ERJ or BA or TDG or RTX or LMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
12), 2. 6% yield, +156. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LMT: +156. 2%, BA: +94. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ERJ and BA and TDG and RTX and LMT?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ERJ is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BA is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TDG is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; RTX is a large-cap quality compounder stock; LMT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. TDG, RTX, LMT pay a dividend while ERJ, BA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.