ESEA
Euroseas Ltd.
Marine Shipping
Market Cap$506M
5Y Perf.+1069.6%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
ESEA vs ZIM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
Marine Shipping
Market Cap$3.15B
5Y Perf.+116.7%
ESEA vs ZIM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ESEA | ZIM |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping |
| Market Cap | $506M | $3.15B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $228M | $6.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $137M | $479M |
| Gross Margin | 63.5% | 16.8% |
| Operating Margin | 61.6% | 12.3% |
| Forward P/E | 4.3x | 6.6x |
| Total Debt | $217M | $5.74B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $177M | $1.05B |
ESEA vs ZIM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
ESEA
ZIM
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Euroseas Ltd. (ESEA) | 100 | 1169.6 | +1069.6% |
| ZIM Integrated Ship… (ZIM) | 100 | 216.7 | +116.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ESEA vs ZIM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: ESEA leads in 7 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ESEA
Euroseas Ltd.
The Income Pick
ESEA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.28, yield 3.8%
- Rev growth 7.0%, EPS growth 21.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.28, Low D/E 46.8%, current ratio 4.89x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
The Long-Run Compounder
ZIM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 5.5% 10Y total return vs ESEA's 389.1%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ESEA | 7.0% revenue growth vs ZIM's -18.1% |
| Value | ESEA | Lower P/E (4.3x vs 6.6x) |
| Quality / Margins | ESEA | 60.1% margin vs ZIM's 6.9% |
| Stability / Safety | ESEA | Beta 1.28 vs ZIM's 1.33, lower leverage |
| Dividends | ESEA | 3.8% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs ZIM's 16.4% |
| Momentum (1Y) | ESEA | +115.9% vs ZIM's +106.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ESEA | 19.6% ROA vs ZIM's 4.3%, ROIC 19.5% vs 7.3% |
ESEA vs ZIM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2022
ESEA vs ZIM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLESEALAGGINGZIM
ZIMZIM Integrated Shippi…
1leads
ESEAEuroseas Ltd.
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs ZIMMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
ESEA5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
ZIM3/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
ESEA9/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
ESEA5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
ESEA2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ESEA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ZIM is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.9B annually — 30.3x ESEA's $228M. ESEA is the more profitable business, keeping 60.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ZIM's 6.9%. On growth, ESEA holds the edge at +7.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ESEAEuroseas Ltd. | ZIMZIM Integrated Sh… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $228M | $6.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $169M | $2.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $137M | $479M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $64M | $2.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.5% | +16.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +61.6% | +12.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +60.1% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +28.1% | +29.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.7% | -31.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +65.9% | -93.1% |
ESEA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
ZIM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.7x trailing earnings, ESEA trades at a 44% valuation discount to ZIM's 6.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ESEA's 3.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ZIM's 3.7x.
| Metric | ESEAEuroseas Ltd. | ZIMZIM Integrated Sh… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $506M | $3.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $546M | $7.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 3.67x | 6.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 4.32x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.44x | 3.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.22x | 0.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.08x | 0.78x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.90x | 1.96x |
ZIM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ESEA leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ESEA delivers a 29.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $12 for ZIM. ESEA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.47x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ZIM's 1.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ESEA scores 7/9 vs ZIM's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ESEAEuroseas Ltd. | ZIMZIM Integrated Sh… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +29.6% | +12.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +19.6% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +19.5% | +7.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.7% | +9.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.47x | 1.43x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $40M | $4.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $177M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $217M | $5.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.47x | 2.02x |
ESEA leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ESEA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ESEA five years ago would be worth $54,420 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,830 for ZIM. Over the past 12 months, ESEA leads with a +115.9% total return vs ZIM's +106.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ESEA at 73.8% vs ZIM's 26.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ESEAEuroseas Ltd. | ZIMZIM Integrated Sh… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +34.7% | +23.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +115.9% | +106.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +425.3% | +104.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +444.2% | +88.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +389.1% | +548.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +73.8% | +26.9% |
ESEA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ESEA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ESEA is the less volatile stock with a 1.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ZIM's 1.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ESEA currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs ZIM's 87.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ESEAEuroseas Ltd. | ZIMZIM Integrated Sh… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.28x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $74.70 | $29.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.76 | $12.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.8% | +87.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.5 | 61.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 86K | 1.8M |
ESEA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ESEA and ZIM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ESEA as "Buy" and ZIM as "Hold". For income investors, ZIM offers the higher dividend yield at 16.39% vs ESEA's 3.78%.
| Metric | ESEAEuroseas Ltd. | ZIMZIM Integrated Sh… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $14.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.8% | +16.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.73 | $4.28 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | 0.0% |
Evenly matched — ESEA and ZIM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
ESEA leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ZIM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallEuroseas Ltd. (ESEA)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
ESEA vs ZIM: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ESEA or ZIM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Euroseas Ltd.
(ESEA) is the stronger pick with 7. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 1% for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). Euroseas Ltd. (ESEA) offers the better valuation at 3. 7x trailing P/E (4. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Euroseas Ltd. (ESEA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ESEA or ZIM?
On trailing P/E, Euroseas Ltd.
(ESEA) is the cheapest at 3. 7x versus ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. at 6. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ESEA or ZIM?
Over the past 5 years, Euroseas Ltd.
(ESEA) delivered a total return of +444. 2%, compared to +88. 3% for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ZIM returned +548. 1% versus ESEA's +389. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ESEA or ZIM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Euroseas Ltd.
(ESEA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 28β versus ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. 's 1. 33β — meaning ZIM is approximately 4% more volatile than ESEA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Euroseas Ltd. (ESEA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 47% versus 143% for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ESEA or ZIM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Euroseas Ltd.
(ESEA) is pulling ahead at 7. 0% versus -18. 1% for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Euroseas Ltd. grew EPS 21. 7% year-over-year, compared to -77. 7% for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ESEA leads at 7. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ESEA or ZIM?
Euroseas Ltd.
(ESEA) is the more profitable company, earning 60. 1% net margin versus 6. 9% for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. — meaning it keeps 60. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ESEA leads at 57. 0% versus 12. 2% for ZIM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ESEA leads at 63. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — ESEA or ZIM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) offers the highest yield at 16. 4%, versus 3. 8% for Euroseas Ltd. (ESEA).
08Is ESEA or ZIM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
(ZIM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (16. 4% yield, +548. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ZIM: +548. 1%, ESEA: +389. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ESEA and ZIM?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(ESEA: 7.7% · ZIM: -31.5%)Net Margin>
%
(ESEA: 60.1% · ZIM: 6.9%)P/E Ratio<
x
(ESEA: 3.7x · ZIM: 6.6x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.