ESEA
Euroseas Ltd.
Marine Shipping
Market Cap$506M
5Y Perf.+1069.6%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
ESEA vs ZIM vs MATX vs CMRE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
Marine Shipping
Market Cap$3.15B
5Y Perf.+116.7%
MATX
Matson, Inc.
Marine Shipping
Market Cap$5.48B
5Y Perf.+201.0%
CMRE
Costamare Inc.
Marine Shipping
Market Cap$2.10B
5Y Perf.+193.3%
ESEA vs ZIM vs MATX vs CMRE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ESEA | ZIM | MATX | CMRE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping |
| Market Cap | $506M | $3.15B | $5.48B | $2.10B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $228M | $6.90B | $3.32B | $1.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $137M | $479M | $429M | $365M |
| Gross Margin | 63.5% | 16.8% | 18.4% | 48.2% |
| Operating Margin | 61.6% | 12.3% | 13.6% | 39.4% |
| Forward P/E | 4.3x | 6.6x | 13.4x | 6.8x |
| Total Debt | $217M | $5.74B | $727M | $1.51B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $177M | $1.05B | $142M | $528M |
ESEA vs ZIM vs MATX vs CMRE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
ESEA
ZIM
MATX
CMRE
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Euroseas Ltd. (ESEA) | 100 | 1169.6 | +1069.6% |
| ZIM Integrated Ship… (ZIM) | 100 | 216.7 | +116.7% |
| Matson, Inc. (MATX) | 100 | 301.0 | +201.0% |
| Costamare Inc. (CMRE) | 100 | 293.3 | +193.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ESEA vs ZIM vs MATX vs CMRE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: ESEA leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Costamare Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. ZIM also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ESEA
Euroseas Ltd.
The Growth Play
ESEA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 7.0%, EPS growth 21.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.28, Low D/E 46.8%, current ratio 4.89x
- 7.0% revenue growth vs CMRE's -57.9%
- Lower P/E (4.3x vs 6.8x)
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
The Income Pick
ZIM is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 16.4% yield, vs MATX's 0.8%
Best for: dividends
MATX
Matson, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
MATX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 476.1% 10Y total return vs ESEA's 389.1%
Best for: long-term compounding
CMRE
Costamare Inc.
The Income Pick
CMRE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.25, yield 3.8%
- Beta 1.25, yield 3.8%, current ratio 1.73x
- Beta 1.25 vs MATX's 1.76
- +153.2% vs MATX's +92.4%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ESEA | 7.0% revenue growth vs CMRE's -57.9% |
| Value | ESEA | Lower P/E (4.3x vs 6.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | ESEA | 60.1% margin vs ZIM's 6.9% |
| Stability / Safety | CMRE | Beta 1.25 vs MATX's 1.76 |
| Dividends | ZIM | 16.4% yield, vs MATX's 0.8% |
| Momentum (1Y) | CMRE | +153.2% vs MATX's +92.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ESEA | 19.6% ROA vs ZIM's 4.3%, ROIC 19.5% vs 7.3% |
ESEA vs ZIM vs MATX vs CMRE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2022
FY 2025
FY 2025
ESEA vs ZIM vs MATX vs CMRE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLESEALAGGINGCMRE
Who Leads Where
ESEA leads in 3 of 6 categories
ZIM leads 0 • MATX leads 0 • CMRE leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓CMRECostamare Inc.
0leads
MATXMatson, Inc.
0leads
ZIMZIM Integrated Shippi…
0leads
ESEAEuroseas Ltd.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs ZIMvs MATXMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
ESEA4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
ESEA7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
ESEA3/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ESEA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ZIM is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.9B annually — 30.3x ESEA's $228M. ESEA is the more profitable business, keeping 60.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ZIM's 6.9%. On growth, ESEA holds the edge at +7.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ESEAEuroseas Ltd. | ZIMZIM Integrated Sh… | MATXMatson, Inc. | CMRECostamare Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $228M | $6.9B | $3.3B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $169M | $2.1B | $644M | $550M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $137M | $479M | $429M | $365M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $64M | $2.0B | $418M | $262M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.5% | +16.8% | +18.4% | +48.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +61.6% | +12.3% | +13.6% | +39.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +60.1% | +6.9% | +12.9% | +33.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +28.1% | +29.0% | +12.6% | +23.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.7% | -31.5% | -3.1% | -61.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +65.9% | -93.1% | -15.1% | +140.0% |
ESEA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ESEA and ZIM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.7x trailing earnings, ESEA trades at a 72% valuation discount to MATX's 13.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ESEA's 3.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MATX's 7.6x.
| Metric | ESEAEuroseas Ltd. | ZIMZIM Integrated Sh… | MATXMatson, Inc. | CMRECostamare Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $506M | $3.1B | $5.5B | $2.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $546M | $7.8B | $6.1B | $3.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 3.67x | 6.56x | 12.98x | 6.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 4.32x | — | 13.40x | 6.81x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.51x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.44x | 3.68x | 7.61x | 5.11x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.22x | 0.46x | 1.64x | 2.39x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.08x | 0.78x | 2.03x | 0.97x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.90x | 1.96x | 35.63x | 4.44x |
Evenly matched — ESEA and ZIM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ESEA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ESEA delivers a 29.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $12 for ZIM. MATX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.26x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ZIM's 1.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ESEA scores 7/9 vs ZIM's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ESEAEuroseas Ltd. | ZIMZIM Integrated Sh… | MATXMatson, Inc. | CMRECostamare Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +29.6% | +12.0% | +15.9% | +16.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +19.6% | +4.3% | +9.3% | +8.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +19.5% | +7.3% | +10.8% | +9.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.7% | +9.6% | +11.3% | +11.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.47x | 1.43x | 0.26x | 0.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $40M | $4.7B | $585M | $987M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $177M | $1.1B | $142M | $528M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $217M | $5.7B | $727M | $1.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.47x | 2.02x | 127.63x | 5.21x |
ESEA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ESEA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ESEA five years ago would be worth $54,420 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,830 for ZIM. Over the past 12 months, CMRE leads with a +153.2% total return vs MATX's +92.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ESEA at 73.8% vs ZIM's 26.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ESEAEuroseas Ltd. | ZIMZIM Integrated Sh… | MATXMatson, Inc. | CMRECostamare Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +34.7% | +23.2% | +46.1% | +12.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +115.9% | +106.6% | +92.4% | +153.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +425.3% | +104.5% | +177.5% | +197.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +444.2% | +88.3% | +181.0% | +146.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +389.1% | +548.1% | +476.1% | +242.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +73.8% | +26.9% | +40.5% | +43.9% |
ESEA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ESEA and CMRE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CMRE is the less volatile stock with a 1.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MATX's 1.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ESEA currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs ZIM's 87.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ESEAEuroseas Ltd. | ZIMZIM Integrated Sh… | MATXMatson, Inc. | CMRECostamare Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.28x | 1.33x | 1.76x | 1.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $74.70 | $29.97 | $189.28 | $18.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.76 | $12.33 | $86.97 | $6.63 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.8% | +87.1% | +95.1% | +96.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.5 | 61.3 | 64.1 | 55.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 86K | 1.8M | 274K | 388K |
Evenly matched — ESEA and CMRE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ZIM and MATX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ESEA as "Buy", ZIM as "Hold", MATX as "Buy", CMRE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 5.5% upside for MATX (target: $190) vs -43.3% for ZIM (target: $15). For income investors, ZIM offers the higher dividend yield at 16.39% vs MATX's 0.80%.
| Metric | ESEAEuroseas Ltd. | ZIMZIM Integrated Sh… | MATXMatson, Inc. | CMRECostamare Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $14.80 | $190.00 | $12.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 6 | 11 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.8% | +16.4% | +0.8% | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 0 | 12 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.73 | $4.28 | $1.44 | $0.66 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | 0.0% | +5.5% | 0.0% |
Evenly matched — ZIM and MATX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
ESEA leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
Best OverallEuroseas Ltd. (ESEA)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
ESEA vs ZIM vs MATX vs CMRE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ESEA or ZIM or MATX or CMRE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Euroseas Ltd.
(ESEA) is the stronger pick with 7. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -57. 9% for Costamare Inc. (CMRE). Euroseas Ltd. (ESEA) offers the better valuation at 3. 7x trailing P/E (4. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Euroseas Ltd. (ESEA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ESEA or ZIM or MATX or CMRE?
On trailing P/E, Euroseas Ltd.
(ESEA) is the cheapest at 3. 7x versus Matson, Inc. at 13. 0x. On forward P/E, Euroseas Ltd. is actually cheaper at 4. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ESEA or ZIM or MATX or CMRE?
Over the past 5 years, Euroseas Ltd.
(ESEA) delivered a total return of +444. 2%, compared to +88. 3% for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ZIM returned +548. 1% versus CMRE's +242. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ESEA or ZIM or MATX or CMRE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Costamare Inc.
(CMRE) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 25β versus Matson, Inc. 's 1. 76β — meaning MATX is approximately 40% more volatile than CMRE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Matson, Inc. (MATX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 26% versus 143% for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ESEA or ZIM or MATX or CMRE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Euroseas Ltd.
(ESEA) is pulling ahead at 7. 0% versus -57. 9% for Costamare Inc. (CMRE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Euroseas Ltd. grew EPS 21. 7% year-over-year, compared to -77. 7% for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ESEA leads at 7. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ESEA or ZIM or MATX or CMRE?
Euroseas Ltd.
(ESEA) is the more profitable company, earning 60. 1% net margin versus 6. 9% for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. — meaning it keeps 60. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ESEA leads at 57. 0% versus 12. 2% for ZIM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ESEA leads at 63. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ESEA or ZIM or MATX or CMRE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Euroseas Ltd.
(ESEA) trades at 4. 3x forward P/E versus 13. 4x for Matson, Inc. — 9. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MATX: 5. 5% to $190. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ESEA or ZIM or MATX or CMRE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) offers the highest yield at 16. 4%, versus 0. 8% for Matson, Inc. (MATX).
09Is ESEA or ZIM or MATX or CMRE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
(ZIM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (16. 4% yield, +548. 1% 10Y return). Matson, Inc. (MATX) carries a higher beta of 1. 76 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ZIM: +548. 1%, MATX: +476. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ESEA and ZIM and MATX and CMRE?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(ESEA: 7.7% · ZIM: -31.5%)Net Margin>
%
(ESEA: 60.1% · ZIM: 6.9%)P/E Ratio<
x
(ESEA: 3.7x · ZIM: 6.6x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.