ETD
Ethan Allen Interiors Inc.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Market Cap$519M
5Y Perf.+80.6%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
ETD vs MLKN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
MLKN
MillerKnoll, Inc.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Market Cap$1.11B
5Y Perf.-28.8%
ETD vs MLKN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ETD | MLKN |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $519M | $1.11B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $593M | $3.75B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $40M | $-25M |
| Gross Margin | 60.4% | 38.7% |
| Operating Margin | 7.8% | 2.0% |
| Forward P/E | 14.2x | 9.0x |
| Total Debt | $124M | $1.81B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $76M | $194M |
ETD vs MLKN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
ETD
MLKN
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ethan Allen Interio… (ETD) | 100 | 180.6 | +80.6% |
| MillerKnoll, Inc. (MLKN) | 100 | 71.2 | -28.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ETD vs MLKN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: ETD leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. MillerKnoll, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ETD
Ethan Allen Interiors Inc.
The Income Pick
ETD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.11, yield 9.6%
- 7.3% 10Y total return vs MLKN's -23.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.11, Low D/E 25.8%, current ratio 2.03x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
MLKN
MillerKnoll, Inc.
The Growth Play
MLKN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 1.1%, EPS growth -147.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.4%
- 1.1% revenue growth vs ETD's -4.9%
- Lower P/E (9.0x vs 14.2x)
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MLKN | 1.1% revenue growth vs ETD's -4.9% |
| Value | MLKN | Lower P/E (9.0x vs 14.2x) |
| Quality / Margins | ETD | 6.8% margin vs MLKN's -0.7% |
| Stability / Safety | ETD | Beta 1.11 vs MLKN's 1.69, lower leverage |
| Dividends | ETD | 9.6% yield, vs MLKN's 4.6% |
| Momentum (1Y) | MLKN | +6.9% vs ETD's -12.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ETD | 5.5% ROA vs MLKN's -0.6%, ROIC 8.7% vs 1.3% |
ETD vs MLKN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2021
FY 2025
ETD vs MLKN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLETDLAGGINGMLKN
MLKNMillerKnoll, Inc.
1leads
ETDEthan Allen Interiors…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs MLKNMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
ETD5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
MLKN4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
ETD8/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
ETD1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ETD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MLKN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.7B annually — 6.3x ETD's $593M. ETD is the more profitable business, keeping 6.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MLKN's -0.7%. On growth, MLKN holds the edge at -1.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ETDEthan Allen Inter… | MLKNMillerKnoll, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $593M | $3.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $61M | $145M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $40M | -$25M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $65M | $70M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +60.4% | +38.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.8% | +2.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | -0.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | +1.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.8% | -1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -37.8% | -75.5% |
ETD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
MLKN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ETD's 7.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MLKN's 14.3x.
| Metric | ETDEthan Allen Inter… | MLKNMillerKnoll, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $519M | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $568M | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.15x | -30.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.22x | 9.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.24x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.32x | 14.29x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.84x | 0.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.08x | 0.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.30x | 10.92x |
MLKN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ETD leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ETD delivers a 8.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-2 for MLKN. ETD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.26x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MLKN's 1.36x.
| Metric | ETDEthan Allen Inter… | MLKNMillerKnoll, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.5% | -1.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.5% | -0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.7% | +1.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.5% | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.26x | 1.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $48M | $1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $76M | $194M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $124M | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 199.47x | 0.66x |
ETD leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ETD and MLKN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ETD five years ago would be worth $9,450 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,609 for MLKN. Over the past 12 months, MLKN leads with a +6.9% total return vs ETD's -12.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MLKN at 3.6% vs ETD's -1.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ETDEthan Allen Inter… | MLKNMillerKnoll, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.0% | -9.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -12.1% | +6.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.7% | +11.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.5% | -53.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.3% | -23.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.2% | +3.6% |
Evenly matched — ETD and MLKN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ETD and MLKN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ETD is the less volatile stock with a 1.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MLKN's 1.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MLKN currently trades 70.7% from its 52-week high vs ETD's 65.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ETDEthan Allen Inter… | MLKNMillerKnoll, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.11x | 1.69x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.41 | $23.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.01 | $13.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.0% | +70.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 32.7 | 44.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 370K | 845K |
Evenly matched — ETD and MLKN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
ETD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ETD as "Hold" and MLKN as "Hold". For income investors, ETD offers the higher dividend yield at 9.57% vs MLKN's 4.58%.
| Metric | ETDEthan Allen Inter… | MLKNMillerKnoll, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.6% | +4.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.95 | $0.75 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +7.6% |
ETD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
ETD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MLKN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallEthan Allen Interiors Inc. (ETD)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
ETD vs MLKN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ETD or MLKN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MillerKnoll, Inc.
(MLKN) is the stronger pick with 1. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 9% for Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (ETD). Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (ETD) offers the better valuation at 10. 2x trailing P/E (14. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (ETD) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ETD or MLKN?
On forward P/E, MillerKnoll, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 9. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ETD or MLKN?
Over the past 5 years, Ethan Allen Interiors Inc.
(ETD) delivered a total return of -5. 5%, compared to -53. 9% for MillerKnoll, Inc. (MLKN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ETD returned +7. 3% versus MLKN's -23. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ETD or MLKN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ethan Allen Interiors Inc.
(ETD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 11β versus MillerKnoll, Inc. 's 1. 69β — meaning MLKN is approximately 52% more volatile than ETD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (ETD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 26% versus 136% for MillerKnoll, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ETD or MLKN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MillerKnoll, Inc.
(MLKN) is pulling ahead at 1. 1% versus -4. 9% for Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (ETD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. grew EPS -19. 3% year-over-year, compared to -147. 7% for MillerKnoll, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MLKN leads at -2. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ETD or MLKN?
Ethan Allen Interiors Inc.
(ETD) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 4% net margin versus -1. 0% for MillerKnoll, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ETD leads at 10. 1% versus 1. 4% for MLKN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ETD leads at 60. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ETD or MLKN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, MillerKnoll, Inc.
(MLKN) trades at 9. 0x forward P/E versus 14. 2x for Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. — 5. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — ETD or MLKN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (ETD) offers the highest yield at 9. 6%, versus 4. 6% for MillerKnoll, Inc. (MLKN).
09Is ETD or MLKN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ethan Allen Interiors Inc.
(ETD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 11), 9. 6% yield). MillerKnoll, Inc. (MLKN) carries a higher beta of 1. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ETD: +7. 3%, MLKN: -23. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ETD and MLKN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ETD is a small-cap deep-value stock; MLKN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(ETD: -4.8% · MLKN: -1.6%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.