Regulated Electric
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
EXC vs GEV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Renewable Utilities
EXC vs GEV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Electric | Renewable Utilities |
| Market Cap | $46.05B | $300.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $24.79B | $39.38B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.78B | $9.38B |
| Gross Margin | 29.5% | 19.9% |
| Operating Margin | 21.0% | 3.9% |
| Forward P/E | 15.8x | 40.3x |
| Total Debt | $50.55B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.15B | $8.85B |
EXC vs GEV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exelon Corporation (EXC) | 100 | 119.8 | +19.8% |
| GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) | 100 | 818.3 | +718.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EXC vs GEV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EXC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta -0.14, yield 3.5%
- Beta -0.14, yield 3.5%, current ratio 0.92x
- Lower P/E (15.8x vs 40.3x)
GEV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 8.9%, EPS growth 217.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.7%
- 7.5% 10Y total return vs EXC's 124.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.76, current ratio 0.98x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.9% revenue growth vs EXC's 5.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.8x vs 40.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.8% margin vs EXC's 11.2% | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs GEV's 0.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +179.3% vs EXC's +0.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.2% ROA vs EXC's 3.3%, ROIC 27.9% vs 5.1% |
EXC vs GEV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EXC vs GEV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GEV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GEV is the larger business by revenue, generating $39.4B annually — 1.6x EXC's $24.8B. GEV is the more profitable business, keeping 23.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EXC's 11.2%. On growth, GEV holds the edge at +16.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $24.8B | $39.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8.9B | $2.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.8B | $9.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2.2B | $3.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.5% | +19.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.0% | +3.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +23.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.7% | +9.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.9% | +16.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
EXC leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.4x trailing earnings, EXC trades at a 74% valuation discount to GEV's 63.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EXC's 10.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GEV's 130.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $46.1B | $300.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $95.5B | $291.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.43x | 63.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.78x | 40.26x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.57x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.86x | 130.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.90x | 7.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.58x | 25.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 81.03x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GEV leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GEV delivers a 79.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $80 in annual profit, vs $10 for EXC. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GEV scores 6/9 vs EXC's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.8% | +79.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.3% | +15.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.1% | +27.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.0% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.76x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $49.4B | -$8.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.2B | $8.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $50.6B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.42x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GEV leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GEV five years ago would be worth $85,407 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,447 for EXC. Over the past 12 months, GEV leads with a +179.3% total return vs EXC's +0.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GEV at 104.4% vs EXC's 5.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.5% | +64.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.8% | +179.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.1% | +754.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +64.5% | +754.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +124.7% | +754.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.1% | +104.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EXC and GEV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EXC is the less volatile stock with a -0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GEV's 1.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GEV currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs EXC's 88.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.14x | 1.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $50.65 | $1181.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $41.71 | $387.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.9% | +94.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.6 | 63.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8.2M | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
EXC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates EXC as "Hold" and GEV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.2% upside for EXC (target: $49) vs 0.1% for GEV (target: $1120). EXC is the only dividend payer here at 3.55% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $49.18 | $1119.95 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 35 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.5% | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.60 | $1.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.1% |
GEV leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). EXC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
EXC vs GEV: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EXC or GEV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, GE Vernova Inc.
(GEV) is the stronger pick with 8. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 3% for Exelon Corporation (EXC). Exelon Corporation (EXC) offers the better valuation at 16. 4x trailing P/E (15. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EXC or GEV?
On trailing P/E, Exelon Corporation (EXC) is the cheapest at 16.
4x versus GE Vernova Inc. at 63. 3x. On forward P/E, Exelon Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EXC or GEV?
Over the past 5 years, GE Vernova Inc.
(GEV) delivered a total return of +754. 1%, compared to +64. 5% for Exelon Corporation (EXC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GEV returned +754. 1% versus EXC's +124. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EXC or GEV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exelon Corporation (EXC) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
14β versus GE Vernova Inc. 's 1. 76β — meaning GEV is approximately -1352% more volatile than EXC relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — EXC or GEV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), GE Vernova Inc.
(GEV) is pulling ahead at 8. 9% versus 5. 3% for Exelon Corporation (EXC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GE Vernova Inc. grew EPS 217. 0% year-over-year, compared to 11. 8% for Exelon Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, GEV leads at 8. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EXC or GEV?
GE Vernova Inc.
(GEV) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 8% net margin versus 11. 4% for Exelon Corporation — meaning it keeps 12. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EXC leads at 21. 2% versus 3. 6% for GEV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EXC leads at 27. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EXC or GEV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Exelon Corporation (EXC) trades at 15.
8x forward P/E versus 40. 3x for GE Vernova Inc. — 24. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EXC: 9. 2% to $49. 18.
08Which pays a better dividend — EXC or GEV?
In this comparison, EXC (3.
5% yield) pays a dividend. GEV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is EXC or GEV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Exelon Corporation (EXC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
14), 3. 5% yield, +124. 7% 10Y return). GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) carries a higher beta of 1. 76 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXC: +124. 7%, GEV: +754. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EXC and GEV?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: EXC is a mid-cap deep-value stock; GEV is a large-cap quality compounder stock. EXC pays a dividend while GEV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.