Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Expand Energy Corporation (EXE) vs EQT Corporation (EQT) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | EXE | 187.2% revenue growth vs EQT's 65.5% |
| Value | EXE | Lower P/E (12.0x vs 12.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | EQT | 23.6% net margin vs EXE's 15.0% |
| Stability / Safety | EXE | Beta 0.49 vs EQT's 0.68 |
| Dividends | EXE | 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs EQT's 1.0% |
| Momentum (1Y) | EQT | +28.8% vs EXE's +11.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | EXE | 6.4% ROA vs EQT's 4.9%, ROIC 7.4% vs 7.7% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Expand Energy Corporation is an independent oil and gas exploration and production company focused on unconventional natural gas resources in the United States. It generates revenue primarily from natural gas sales — with additional contributions from oil and natural gas liquids — through its extensive portfolio of approximately 5,000 wells across key shale plays like the Marcellus and Haynesville formations. The company's competitive advantage lies in its large-scale, low-cost position in premier natural gas basins and its operational expertise in unconventional resource development.
EQT Corporation is America's largest natural gas producer, focused on developing and operating natural gas assets primarily in the Appalachian Basin. It generates revenue through the sale of natural gas (~85% of revenue) and natural gas liquids (~15%), with production concentrated in the prolific Marcellus and Utica shale formations. The company's competitive advantage stems from its massive, low-cost reserve base—it holds the largest natural gas position in the U.S.—and its operational scale in the most productive gas region.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
EQT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Total Returns). EXE leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
EXE and EQT operate at a comparable scale, with $12.1B and $8.6B in trailing revenue. EQT is the more profitable business, keeping 23.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EXE's 15.0%. On growth, EXE holds the edge at +63.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | EXEExpand Energy Cor… | EQTEQT Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12.1B | $8.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5.3B | $5.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.8B | $2.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.8B | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +80.4% | +97.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.8% | +36.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.0% | +23.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.2% | +32.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +63.7% | +2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.3% | +56.5% |
Valuation Metrics
At 14.3x trailing earnings, EXE trades at a 12% valuation discount to EQT's 16.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EXE's 5.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EQT's 7.5x.
| Metric | EXEExpand Energy Cor… | EQTEQT Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $25.7B | $38.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $25.1B | $46.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.26x | 16.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.05x | 12.92x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.00x | 7.51x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.12x | 4.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 1.37x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.98x | 13.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EXE delivers a 9.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $7 for EQT.
| Metric | EXEExpand Energy Cor… | EQTEQT Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.8% | +7.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.4% | +4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.4% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.1% | +9.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$616M | $7.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $616M | $111M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $7.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.91x | 7.50x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in EQT five years ago would be worth $34,713 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $28,500 for EXE. Over the past 12 months, EQT leads with a +28.8% total return vs EXE's +11.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EQT at 24.0% vs EXE's 13.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | EXEExpand Energy Cor… | EQTEQT Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.7% | +15.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +11.8% | +28.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.3% | +90.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +185.0% | +247.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +197.4% | +112.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.0% | +24.0% |
Risk & Volatility
EXE is the less volatile stock with a 0.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EQT's 0.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EQT currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs EXE's 85.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | EXEExpand Energy Cor… | EQTEQT Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.49x | 0.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $126.62 | $62.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $91.02 | $43.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.2% | +98.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.9 | 60.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.9M | 8.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates EXE as "Buy" and EQT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.7% upside for EXE (target: $138) vs -33.1% for EQT (target: $41). For income investors, EXE offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs EQT's 1.04%.
| Metric | EXEExpand Energy Cor… | EQTEQT Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $137.80 | $41.11 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3182.59 | $0.64 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Feb 21 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expand Energy Corpo… (EXE) | 100 | 249.86 | +149.9% |
| EQT Corporation (EQT) | 100 | 296.91 | +196.9% |
EQT Corporation (EQT) returned +247% over 5 years vs Expand Energy Corpo… (EXE)'s +185%. A $10,000 investment in EQT 5 years ago would be worth $34,713 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expand Energy Corpo… (EXE) | $7.9B | $12.1B | +54.0% |
| EQT Corporation (EQT) | $1.9B | $8.6B | +365.4% |
Expand Energy Corporation's revenue grew from $7.9B (2016) to $12.1B (2025) — a 4.9% CAGR. EQT Corporation's revenue grew from $1.9B (2016) to $8.6B (2025) — a 18.6% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expand Energy Corpo… (EXE) | -55.8% | 15.0% | +126.9% |
| EQT Corporation (EQT) | -24.4% | 26.9% | +210.3% |
Expand Energy Corporation's net margin went from -56% (2016) to 15% (2025). EQT Corporation's net margin went from -24% (2016) to 27% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 6 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expand Energy Corpo… (EXE) | 1.2 | 14.6 | +1116.7% |
| EQT Corporation (EQT) | 3.9 | 14.1 | +261.5% |
Expand Energy Corporation has traded in a 1x–15x P/E range over 4 years; current trailing P/E is ~14x. EQT Corporation has traded in a 4x–113x P/E range over 5 years; current trailing P/E is ~16x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expand Energy Corpo… (EXE) | -1,278 | 7.57 | +100.6% |
| EQT Corporation (EQT) | -2.71 | 3.8 | +240.2% |
Expand Energy Corporation's EPS grew from $-1278.00 (2016) to $7.57 (2025). EQT Corporation's EPS grew from $-2.71 (2016) to $3.80 (2025).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Expand Energy Corporation generated $2B FCF in 2025 (+75% vs 2021). EQT Corporation generated $3B FCF in 2025 (+367% vs 2021).
EXE vs EQT: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EXE or EQT a better buy right now?
Expand Energy Corporation (EXE) offers the better valuation at 14.3x trailing P/E (12.0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Expand Energy Corporation (EXE) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EXE or EQT?
On trailing P/E, Expand Energy Corporation (EXE) is the cheapest at 14.3x versus EQT Corporation at 16.2x. On forward P/E, Expand Energy Corporation is actually cheaper at 12.0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EXE or EQT?
Over the past 5 years, EQT Corporation (EQT) delivered a total return of +247.1%, compared to +185.0% for Expand Energy Corporation (EXE). A $10,000 investment in EQT five years ago would be worth approximately $35K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXE returned +197.4% versus EQT's +112.1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EXE or EQT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Expand Energy Corporation (EXE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.49β versus EQT Corporation's 0.68β — meaning EQT is approximately 39% more volatile than EXE relative to the S&P 500.
05Which has better profit margins — EXE or EQT?
EQT Corporation (EQT) is the more profitable company, earning 26.9% net margin versus 15.0% for Expand Energy Corporation — meaning it keeps 26.9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EQT leads at 40.8% versus 16.8% for EXE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EQT leads at 97.4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is EXE or EQT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Expand Energy Corporation (EXE) trades at 12.0x forward P/E versus 12.9x for EQT Corporation — 0.9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EXE: 27.7% to $137.80.
07Which pays a better dividend — EXE or EQT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. Expand Energy Corporation (EXE) offers the highest yield at 100.0%, versus 1.0% for EQT Corporation (EQT).
08Is EXE or EQT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Expand Energy Corporation (EXE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.49), 100.0% yield, +197.4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXE: +197.4%, EQT: +112.1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between EXE and EQT?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.