Oil & Gas Energy
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
EXEEZ vs RRC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
EXEEZ vs RRC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Energy | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | — | $9.78B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $14.15B | $3.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3.23B | $903M |
| Gross Margin | 63.1% | 42.2% |
| Operating Margin | 30.2% | 30.6% |
| Forward P/E | 12.6x | 9.7x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $1.27B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $616M | $204K |
EXEEZ vs RRC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 24 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expand Energy Corpo… (EXEEZ) | 100 | 148.8 | +48.8% |
| Range Resources Cor… (RRC) | 100 | 123.0 | +23.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EXEEZ vs RRC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EXEEZ is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 100.0%
- Rev growth 184.9%, EPS growth 266.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -5.0%
- 65.1% 10Y total return vs RRC's 14.2%
RRC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (9.7x vs 12.6x)
- 28.4% margin vs EXEEZ's 22.8%
- +3.6% vs EXEEZ's -10.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 184.9% revenue growth vs RRC's 27.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 12.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.4% margin vs EXEEZ's 22.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs RRC's 0.16 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs RRC's 0.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +3.6% vs EXEEZ's -10.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.4% ROA vs EXEEZ's 11.4%, ROIC 11.4% vs 9.1% |
EXEEZ vs RRC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EXEEZ vs RRC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — EXEEZ and RRC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EXEEZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.2B annually — 4.5x RRC's $3.2B. RRC is the more profitable business, keeping 28.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EXEEZ's 22.8%. On growth, EXEEZ holds the edge at +37.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $14.2B | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7.3B | $1.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3.2B | $903M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.0B | $1.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.1% | +42.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.2% | +30.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.8% | +28.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.2% | +40.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +37.0% | +22.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.8% | +2.6% |
Valuation Metrics
EXEEZ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.6x trailing earnings, EXEEZ trades at a 17% valuation discount to RRC's 15.1x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | — | $9.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | — | $11.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.59x | 15.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.94x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 2.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 16.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RRC leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RRC delivers a 20.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $17 for EXEEZ. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RRC scores 9/9 vs EXEEZ's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.4% | +20.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.4% | +12.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.1% | +11.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.9% | +13.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$616M | $1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $616M | $204,000 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 24.66x | 12.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — EXEEZ and RRC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RRC five years ago would be worth $32,784 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,513 for EXEEZ. Over the past 12 months, RRC leads with a +3.6% total return vs EXEEZ's -10.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EXEEZ at 18.2% vs RRC's 15.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.7% | +17.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -10.4% | +3.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.1% | +55.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.1% | +227.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.1% | +14.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.2% | +15.8% |
Risk & Volatility
EXEEZ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EXEEZ is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RRC's 0.16 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.12x | 0.16x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $107.96 | $48.31 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $94.69 | $32.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.3% | +85.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 28.8 | 44.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 3.3M |
Analyst Outlook
EXEEZ leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, EXEEZ offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs RRC's 0.86%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 62 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.18 | $0.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | — | +2.4% |
EXEEZ leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). RRC leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
EXEEZ vs RRC: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EXEEZ or RRC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Expand Energy Corporation (EXEEZ) is the stronger pick with 184.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 27. 6% for Range Resources Corporation (RRC). Expand Energy Corporation (EXEEZ) offers the better valuation at 12. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Range Resources Corporation (RRC) a "Hold" — based on 62 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EXEEZ or RRC?
On trailing P/E, Expand Energy Corporation (EXEEZ) is the cheapest at 12.
6x versus Range Resources Corporation at 15. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EXEEZ or RRC?
Over the past 5 years, Range Resources Corporation (RRC) delivered a total return of +227.
8%, compared to +65. 1% for Expand Energy Corporation (EXEEZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXEEZ returned +65. 1% versus RRC's +14. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EXEEZ or RRC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Expand Energy Corporation (EXEEZ) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
12β versus Range Resources Corporation's 0. 16β — meaning RRC is approximately 31% more volatile than EXEEZ relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — EXEEZ or RRC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Expand Energy Corporation (EXEEZ) is pulling ahead at 184.
9% versus 27. 6% for Range Resources Corporation (RRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Expand Energy Corporation grew EPS 266. 4% year-over-year, compared to 151. 4% for Range Resources Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, EXEEZ leads at -5. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EXEEZ or RRC?
Range Resources Corporation (RRC) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
0% net margin versus 15. 0% for Expand Energy Corporation — meaning it keeps 22. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RRC leads at 27. 9% versus 20. 4% for EXEEZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EXEEZ leads at 80. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — EXEEZ or RRC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Expand Energy Corporation (EXEEZ) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 0. 9% for Range Resources Corporation (RRC).
08Is EXEEZ or RRC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Expand Energy Corporation (EXEEZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
12), 100. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXEEZ: +65. 1%, RRC: +14. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between EXEEZ and RRC?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.