Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
EXOD vs BTBT vs COIN vs MARA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Financial - Capital Markets
EXOD vs BTBT vs COIN vs MARA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $145M | $589M | $50.96B | $4.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $122M | $164M | $7.18B | $907M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $0.00 | $137M | $801M | $-1.31B |
| Gross Margin | 60.5% | 61.9% | 74.6% | -47.7% |
| Operating Margin | -6.3% | 16.8% | 20.0% | -90.6% |
| Forward P/E | 1516.0x | 9.2x | 66.1x | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $14M | $7.83B | $3.65B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $95M | $11.29B | $547M |
EXOD vs BTBT vs COIN vs MARA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exodus Movement, In… (EXOD) | 100 | 36.1 | -63.9% |
| Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) | 100 | 25.3 | -74.7% |
| Coinbase Global, In… (COIN) | 100 | 84.8 | -15.2% |
| Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA) | 100 | 40.2 | -59.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EXOD vs BTBT vs COIN vs MARA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EXOD is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 3.23, current ratio 13.49x
BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
- NIM 0.1% vs MARA's 0.1%
- 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs EXOD's 3.4%
- Better valuation composite
COIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- -41.2% 10Y total return vs MARA's -51.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 3.17, Low D/E 52.9%, current ratio 2.34x
- 17.6% margin vs MARA's -144.6%
- -1.8% vs EXOD's -81.1%
MARA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- beta 3.11
- Beta 3.11 vs BTBT's 3.37
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs EXOD's 3.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs MARA's -144.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 3.11 vs BTBT's 3.37 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -1.8% vs EXOD's -81.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.0% ROA vs MARA's -17.1%, ROIC 6.5% vs -9.0% |
EXOD vs BTBT vs COIN vs MARA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EXOD vs BTBT vs COIN vs MARA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
COIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
BTBT leads 1 • MARA leads 1 • EXOD leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COIN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.2B annually — 59.1x EXOD's $122M. COIN is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MARA's -144.6%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $122M | $164M | $7.2B | $907M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | $166M | $202M | $627M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $0 | $137M | $801M | -$1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$26M | -$448M | $2.8B | -$312M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +60.5% | +61.9% | +74.6% | -47.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.3% | +16.8% | +20.0% | -90.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -9.3% | +17.3% | +17.6% | -144.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -21.0% | -65.3% | +33.8% | -34.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -36.2% | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -170.3% | +2.8% | -7.2% | -4.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — EXOD and BTBT each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.2x trailing earnings, BTBT trades at a 79% valuation discount to COIN's 43.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BTBT's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than COIN's 29.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $145M | $589M | $51.0B | $4.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $140M | $508M | $47.5B | $7.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -19.44x | 9.15x | 43.36x | -3.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1516.00x | — | 66.07x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.86x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.49x | 29.25x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.20x | 3.60x | 7.10x | 5.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.89x | 0.56x | 3.75x | 1.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 21.00x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-31 for MARA. BTBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MARA's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTBT scores 6/9 vs MARA's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.5% | +21.4% | +5.7% | -30.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.0% | +19.0% | +2.8% | -17.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.5% | +6.5% | +5.7% | -9.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.8% | +8.5% | +8.1% | -12.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.03x | 0.53x | 1.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | -$81M | -$3.5B | $3.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $95M | $11.3B | $547M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $14M | $7.8B | $3.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -13.44x | — | 16.97x | 4.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
COIN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in COIN five years ago would be worth $7,317 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,543 for BTBT. Over the past 12 months, COIN leads with a -1.8% total return vs EXOD's -81.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EXOD at 55.4% vs BTBT's -7.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -50.1% | -10.3% | -18.4% | +28.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -81.1% | -9.0% | -1.8% | -4.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +275.2% | -19.7% | +232.1% | +36.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.4% | -84.6% | -26.8% | -59.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.4% | -60.4% | -41.2% | -51.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +55.4% | -7.1% | +49.2% | +10.8% |
Risk & Volatility
MARA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MARA is the less volatile stock with a 3.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MARA currently trades 54.2% from its 52-week high vs EXOD's 13.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.23x | 3.37x | 3.17x | 3.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $56.00 | $4.55 | $444.65 | $23.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.89 | $1.25 | $139.36 | $6.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +13.5% | +40.2% | +43.4% | +54.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.2 | 69.1 | 53.9 | 69.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 73K | 18.5M | 10.8M | 47.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EXOD as "Buy", BTBT as "Buy", COIN as "Buy", MARA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 190.2% upside for EXOD (target: $22) vs 26.1% for COIN (target: $243). BTBT is the only dividend payer here at 0.31% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.00 | $5.00 | $243.33 | $16.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 2 | 37 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.3% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.01 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +10.4% | 0.0% | +1.6% | +1.0% |
COIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). BTBT leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
EXOD vs BTBT vs COIN vs MARA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EXOD or BTBT or COIN or MARA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 4% for Exodus Movement, Inc. (EXOD). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Exodus Movement, Inc. (EXOD) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EXOD or BTBT or COIN or MARA?
On trailing P/E, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the cheapest at 9. 2x versus Coinbase Global, Inc. at 43. 4x. On forward P/E, Coinbase Global, Inc. is actually cheaper at 66. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EXOD or BTBT or COIN or MARA?
Over the past 5 years, Coinbase Global, Inc.
(COIN) delivered a total return of -26. 8%, compared to -84. 6% for Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: COIN returned -41. 2% versus EXOD's -71. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EXOD or BTBT or COIN or MARA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
(MARA) is the lower-risk stock at 3. 11β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 37β — meaning BTBT is approximately 9% more volatile than MARA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 105% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EXOD or BTBT or COIN or MARA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus 3. 4% for Exodus Movement, Inc. (EXOD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -314. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EXOD or BTBT or COIN or MARA?
Coinbase Global, Inc.
(COIN) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 6% net margin versus -144. 6% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: COIN leads at 20. 0% versus -90. 6% for MARA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — COIN leads at 74. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EXOD or BTBT or COIN or MARA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Coinbase Global, Inc.
(COIN) trades at 66. 1x forward P/E versus 1516. 0x for Exodus Movement, Inc. — 1449. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EXOD: 190. 2% to $22. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — EXOD or BTBT or COIN or MARA?
In this comparison, BTBT (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. EXOD, COIN, MARA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is EXOD or BTBT or COIN or MARA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Coinbase Global, Inc.
(COIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Exodus Movement, Inc. (EXOD) carries a higher beta of 3. 23 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (COIN: -41. 2%, EXOD: -71. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EXOD and BTBT and COIN and MARA?
These companies operate in different sectors (EXOD (Technology) and BTBT (Financial Services) and COIN (Financial Services) and MARA (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: EXOD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; COIN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.