Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
EXOZ vs GEVO vs LNZA vs MCRB vs CODX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
Waste Management
Biotechnology
Medical - Devices
EXOZ vs GEVO vs LNZA vs MCRB vs CODX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Chemicals - Specialty | Waste Management | Biotechnology | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $84M | $493M | $53M | $74M | $2M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $174M | $40M | $1M | $622K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $-11M | $-76M | $-47M | $-47M |
| Gross Margin | — | 23.4% | 29.0% | 16.0% | 64.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | -4.6% | -265.8% | -76.4% | -50.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 12.1x | — |
| Total Debt | $1M | $168M | $82M | $83M | $1M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $1M | $43M | $46M | $12M |
EXOZ vs GEVO vs LNZA vs MCRB vs CODX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| eXoZymes, Inc. (EXOZ) | 100 | 76.3 | -23.7% |
| Gevo, Inc. (GEVO) | 100 | 110.9 | +10.9% |
| LanzaTech Global, I… (LNZA) | 100 | 19.9 | -80.1% |
| Seres Therapeutics,… (MCRB) | 100 | 38.2 | -61.8% |
| Co-Diagnostics, Inc. (CODX) | 100 | 284.0 | +184.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EXOZ vs GEVO vs LNZA vs MCRB vs CODX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EXOZ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.04
- 15.6% 10Y total return vs CODX's -66.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.04, Low D/E 13.3%, current ratio 8.12x
- Beta 1.04, current ratio 8.12x
GEVO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 8.5%, EPS growth 58.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 415.1%
- 8.5% revenue growth vs MCRB's -153.7%
- -1.7% ROA vs CODX's -109.6%, ROIC -2.8% vs -73.9%
LNZA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, MCRB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CODX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +451.4% vs EXOZ's -9.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.5% revenue growth vs MCRB's -153.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.6% margin vs CODX's -75.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.04 vs MCRB's 1.69, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +451.4% vs EXOZ's -9.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.7% ROA vs CODX's -109.6%, ROIC -2.8% vs -73.9% |
EXOZ vs GEVO vs LNZA vs MCRB vs CODX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
EXOZ vs GEVO vs LNZA vs MCRB vs CODX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GEVO leads in 2 of 6 categories
EXOZ leads 0 • LNZA leads 0 • MCRB leads 0 • CODX leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GEVO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GEVO and EXOZ operate at a comparable scale, with $174M and $0 in trailing revenue. GEVO is the more profitable business, keeping -6.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CODX's -75.3%. On growth, CODX holds the edge at +76.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $174M | $40M | $1M | $622,489 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9M | $18M | -$102M | -$83M | -$30M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | -$11M | -$76M | -$47M | -$47M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | -$35M | -$81M | -$42M | -$30M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +23.4% | +29.0% | +16.0% | +64.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -4.6% | -2.7% | -76.4% | -50.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -6.6% | -190.2% | -40.9% | -75.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -19.9% | -2.0% | -36.9% | -47.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +47.5% | -6.7% | — | +76.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.0% | +3.8% | +103.4% | -155.5% | -65.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — GEVO and LNZA and CODX each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $84M | $493M | $53M | $74M | $2M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $76M | $659M | $91M | $112M | -$8M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -13.89x | -14.50x | -0.32x | 12.06x | -0.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 102.12x | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.07x | 1.06x | 94.25x | 3.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.80x | 1.01x | 3.33x | 1.55x | 0.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 85.97x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GEVO leads this category, winning 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GEVO delivers a -2.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-2 for LNZA. CODX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LNZA's 6.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MCRB scores 7/9 vs CODX's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -155.2% | -2.4% | -2.2% | -127.3% | -125.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -108.0% | -1.7% | -58.8% | -34.5% | -109.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.7% | -2.8% | -147.7% | -90.3% | -73.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -92.4% | -3.1% | -60.8% | -86.4% | -80.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 0.36x | 6.09x | 1.88x | 0.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | $166M | $38M | $37M | -$11M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $1M | $43M | $46M | $12M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $168M | $82M | $83M | $1M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -0.04x | — | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — EXOZ and GEVO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EXOZ five years ago would be worth $11,561 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $186 for MCRB. Over the past 12 months, CODX leads with a +451.4% total return vs EXOZ's -9.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GEVO at 18.2% vs LNZA's -59.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.0% | -1.5% | +61.8% | -49.0% | -65.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -9.1% | +88.0% | -5.2% | -6.9% | +451.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.6% | +65.0% | -93.4% | -93.1% | +39.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.6% | -65.2% | -97.7% | -98.1% | -76.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.6% | -98.6% | -97.7% | -98.5% | -66.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.0% | +18.2% | -59.7% | -58.9% | +11.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EXOZ and GEVO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EXOZ is the less volatile stock with a 1.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MCRB's 1.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GEVO currently trades 68.4% from its 52-week high vs MCRB's 25.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.92x | 1.64x | 1.65x | 1.73x | 1.17x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.40 | $2.97 | $71.19 | $29.98 | $6.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.08 | $1.01 | $7.88 | $6.53 | $0.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.3% | +68.4% | +31.8% | +25.8% | +30.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.3 | 53.5 | 46.1 | 46.4 | 41.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5K | 4.5M | 49K | 50K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GEVO as "Buy", LNZA as "Hold", MCRB as "Buy", CODX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 210.9% upside for CODX (target: $6) vs -83.8% for MCRB (target: $1).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.50 | $5.50 | $1.25 | $6.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 | 4 | 18 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GEVO leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
EXOZ vs GEVO vs LNZA vs MCRB vs CODX: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EXOZ or GEVO or LNZA or MCRB or CODX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gevo, Inc.
(GEVO) is the stronger pick with 849. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -84. 1% for Co-Diagnostics, Inc. (CODX). Seres Therapeutics, Inc. (MCRB) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gevo, Inc. (GEVO) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — EXOZ or GEVO or LNZA or MCRB or CODX?
Over the past 5 years, eXoZymes, Inc.
(EXOZ) delivered a total return of +15. 6%, compared to -98. 1% for Seres Therapeutics, Inc. (MCRB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXOZ returned +11. 2% versus GEVO's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — EXOZ or GEVO or LNZA or MCRB or CODX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), eXoZymes, Inc.
(EXOZ) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 92β versus Seres Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 73β — meaning MCRB is approximately 87% more volatile than EXOZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Co-Diagnostics, Inc. (CODX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 6% for LanzaTech Global, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — EXOZ or GEVO or LNZA or MCRB or CODX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gevo, Inc.
(GEVO) is pulling ahead at 849. 3% versus -84. 1% for Co-Diagnostics, Inc. (CODX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Seres Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 103. 4% year-over-year, compared to -188. 0% for eXoZymes, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GEVO leads at 415. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — EXOZ or GEVO or LNZA or MCRB or CODX?
Seres Therapeutics, Inc.
(MCRB) is the more profitable company, earning 721. 9% net margin versus -75. 3% for Co-Diagnostics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 721. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EXOZ leads at 0. 0% versus -119. 1% for MCRB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CODX leads at 64. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — EXOZ or GEVO or LNZA or MCRB or CODX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is EXOZ or GEVO or LNZA or MCRB or CODX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, eXoZymes, Inc.
(EXOZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 92)). Seres Therapeutics, Inc. (MCRB) carries a higher beta of 1. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXOZ: +11. 2%, MCRB: -98. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between EXOZ and GEVO and LNZA and MCRB and CODX?
These companies operate in different sectors (EXOZ (Healthcare) and GEVO (Basic Materials) and LNZA (Industrials) and MCRB (Healthcare) and CODX (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: EXOZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GEVO is a small-cap high-growth stock; LNZA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MCRB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CODX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.