Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

EXOZ vs GEVO vs LNZA vs MCRB vs CODX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
EXOZ
eXoZymes, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$84M
5Y Perf.-23.7%
GEVO
Gevo, Inc.

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$493M
5Y Perf.+10.9%
LNZA
LanzaTech Global, Inc.

Waste Management

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$53M
5Y Perf.-80.1%
MCRB
Seres Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$74M
5Y Perf.-61.8%
CODX
Co-Diagnostics, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2M
5Y Perf.+184.0%

EXOZ vs GEVO vs LNZA vs MCRB vs CODX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
EXOZ logoEXOZ
GEVO logoGEVO
LNZA logoLNZA
MCRB logoMCRB
CODX logoCODX
IndustryBiotechnologyChemicals - SpecialtyWaste ManagementBiotechnologyMedical - Devices
Market Cap$84M$493M$53M$74M$2M
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$174M$40M$1M$622K
Net Income (TTM)$-8M$-11M$-76M$-47M$-47M
Gross Margin23.4%29.0%16.0%64.3%
Operating Margin-4.6%-265.8%-76.4%-50.3%
Forward P/E12.1x
Total Debt$1M$168M$82M$83M$1M
Cash & Equiv.$10M$1M$43M$46M$12M

EXOZ vs GEVO vs LNZA vs MCRB vs CODXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

EXOZ
GEVO
LNZA
MCRB
CODX
StockNov 24May 26Return
eXoZymes, Inc. (EXOZ)10076.3-23.7%
Gevo, Inc. (GEVO)100110.9+10.9%
LanzaTech Global, I… (LNZA)10019.9-80.1%
Seres Therapeutics,… (MCRB)10038.2-61.8%
Co-Diagnostics, Inc. (CODX)100284.0+184.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: EXOZ vs GEVO vs LNZA vs MCRB vs CODX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: EXOZ and GEVO are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Gevo, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and operational efficiency and capital deployment. CODX also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
EXOZ
eXoZymes, Inc.
The Income Pick

EXOZ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • beta 1.04
  • 15.6% 10Y total return vs CODX's -66.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.04, Low D/E 13.3%, current ratio 8.12x
  • Beta 1.04, current ratio 8.12x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
GEVO
Gevo, Inc.
The Growth Play

GEVO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 8.5%, EPS growth 58.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 415.1%
  • 8.5% revenue growth vs MCRB's -153.7%
  • -1.7% ROA vs CODX's -109.6%, ROIC -2.8% vs -73.9%
Best for: growth exposure
LNZA
LanzaTech Global, Inc.
The Industrials Pick

LNZA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: industrials exposure
MCRB
Seres Therapeutics, Inc.
The Value Angle

Among these 5 stocks, MCRB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
CODX
Co-Diagnostics, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

CODX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +451.4% vs EXOZ's -9.1%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGEVO logoGEVO8.5% revenue growth vs MCRB's -153.7%
Quality / MarginsEXOZ logoEXOZ0.6% margin vs CODX's -75.3%
Stability / SafetyEXOZ logoEXOZBeta 1.04 vs MCRB's 1.69, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CODX logoCODX+451.4% vs EXOZ's -9.1%
Efficiency (ROA)GEVO logoGEVO-1.7% ROA vs CODX's -109.6%, ROIC -2.8% vs -73.9%

EXOZ vs GEVO vs LNZA vs MCRB vs CODX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

EXOZeXoZymes, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

GEVOGevo, Inc.
FY 2025
Ethanol
95.6%$105M
Hydrocarbon
4.4%$5M
LNZALanzaTech Global, Inc.
FY 2024
Engineering and Other Services
47.4%$20M
License and Service
27.1%$11M
Research And Development
25.4%$11M
MCRBSeres Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2019
License And Service
100.0%$27M
CODXCo-Diagnostics, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
67.2%$418,205
Grant
32.8%$204,284

EXOZ vs GEVO vs LNZA vs MCRB vs CODX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLGEVOLAGGINGCODX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

GEVO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

GEVO and EXOZ operate at a comparable scale, with $174M and $0 in trailing revenue. GEVO is the more profitable business, keeping -6.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CODX's -75.3%. On growth, CODX holds the edge at +76.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricEXOZ logoEXOZeXoZymes, Inc.GEVO logoGEVOGevo, Inc.LNZA logoLNZALanzaTech Global,…MCRB logoMCRBSeres Therapeutic…CODX logoCODXCo-Diagnostics, I…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$174M$40M$1M$622,489
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$9M$18M-$102M-$83M-$30M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$8M-$11M-$76M-$47M-$47M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$11M-$35M-$81M-$42M-$30M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+23.4%+29.0%+16.0%+64.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-4.6%-2.7%-76.4%-50.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-6.6%-190.2%-40.9%-75.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-19.9%-2.0%-36.9%-47.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+47.5%-6.7%+76.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-35.0%+3.8%+103.4%-155.5%-65.2%
GEVO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — GEVO and LNZA and CODX each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricEXOZ logoEXOZeXoZymes, Inc.GEVO logoGEVOGevo, Inc.LNZA logoLNZALanzaTech Global,…MCRB logoMCRBSeres Therapeutic…CODX logoCODXCo-Diagnostics, I…
Market CapShares × price$84M$493M$53M$74M$2M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$76M$659M$91M$112M-$8M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-13.89x-14.50x-0.32x12.06x-0.05x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple102.12x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.07x1.06x94.25x3.46x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share7.80x1.01x3.33x1.55x0.12x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF85.97x
Evenly matched — GEVO and LNZA and CODX each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

GEVO leads this category, winning 4 of 8 comparable metrics.

GEVO delivers a -2.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-2 for LNZA. CODX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LNZA's 6.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MCRB scores 7/9 vs CODX's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricEXOZ logoEXOZeXoZymes, Inc.GEVO logoGEVOGevo, Inc.LNZA logoLNZALanzaTech Global,…MCRB logoMCRBSeres Therapeutic…CODX logoCODXCo-Diagnostics, I…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-155.2%-2.4%-2.2%-127.3%-125.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-108.0%-1.7%-58.8%-34.5%-109.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-2.7%-2.8%-147.7%-90.3%-73.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-92.4%-3.1%-60.8%-86.4%-80.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–934371
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.13x0.36x6.09x1.88x0.06x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$8M$166M$38M$37M-$11M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$10M$1M$43M$46M$12M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1M$168M$82M$83M$1M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-0.04x
GEVO leads this category, winning 4 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — EXOZ and GEVO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in EXOZ five years ago would be worth $11,561 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $186 for MCRB. Over the past 12 months, CODX leads with a +451.4% total return vs EXOZ's -9.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GEVO at 18.2% vs LNZA's -59.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricEXOZ logoEXOZeXoZymes, Inc.GEVO logoGEVOGevo, Inc.LNZA logoLNZALanzaTech Global,…MCRB logoMCRBSeres Therapeutic…CODX logoCODXCo-Diagnostics, I…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-9.0%-1.5%+61.8%-49.0%-65.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-9.1%+88.0%-5.2%-6.9%+451.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+15.6%+65.0%-93.4%-93.1%+39.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+15.6%-65.2%-97.7%-98.1%-76.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+15.6%-98.6%-97.7%-98.5%-66.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+5.0%+18.2%-59.7%-58.9%+11.8%
Evenly matched — EXOZ and GEVO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — EXOZ and GEVO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

EXOZ is the less volatile stock with a 1.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MCRB's 1.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GEVO currently trades 68.4% from its 52-week high vs MCRB's 25.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricEXOZ logoEXOZeXoZymes, Inc.GEVO logoGEVOGevo, Inc.LNZA logoLNZALanzaTech Global,…MCRB logoMCRBSeres Therapeutic…CODX logoCODXCo-Diagnostics, I…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.92x1.64x1.65x1.73x1.17x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$18.40$2.97$71.19$29.98$6.35
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$7.08$1.01$7.88$6.53$0.18
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+54.3%+68.4%+31.8%+25.8%+30.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10048.353.546.146.441.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded5K4.5M49K50K1.5M
Evenly matched — EXOZ and GEVO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: GEVO as "Buy", LNZA as "Hold", MCRB as "Buy", CODX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 210.9% upside for CODX (target: $6) vs -83.8% for MCRB (target: $1).

MetricEXOZ logoEXOZeXoZymes, Inc.GEVO logoGEVOGevo, Inc.LNZA logoLNZALanzaTech Global,…MCRB logoMCRBSeres Therapeutic…CODX logoCODXCo-Diagnostics, I…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$3.50$5.50$1.25$6.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts144185
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.1%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

GEVO leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.

Best OverallGevo, Inc. (GEVO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

EXOZ vs GEVO vs LNZA vs MCRB vs CODX: Key Questions Answered

8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is EXOZ or GEVO or LNZA or MCRB or CODX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Gevo, Inc.

(GEVO) is the stronger pick with 849. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -84. 1% for Co-Diagnostics, Inc. (CODX). Seres Therapeutics, Inc. (MCRB) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gevo, Inc. (GEVO) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — EXOZ or GEVO or LNZA or MCRB or CODX?

Over the past 5 years, eXoZymes, Inc.

(EXOZ) delivered a total return of +15. 6%, compared to -98. 1% for Seres Therapeutics, Inc. (MCRB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXOZ returned +11. 2% versus GEVO's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — EXOZ or GEVO or LNZA or MCRB or CODX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), eXoZymes, Inc.

(EXOZ) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 92β versus Seres Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 73β — meaning MCRB is approximately 87% more volatile than EXOZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Co-Diagnostics, Inc. (CODX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 6% for LanzaTech Global, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — EXOZ or GEVO or LNZA or MCRB or CODX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gevo, Inc.

(GEVO) is pulling ahead at 849. 3% versus -84. 1% for Co-Diagnostics, Inc. (CODX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Seres Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 103. 4% year-over-year, compared to -188. 0% for eXoZymes, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GEVO leads at 415. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — EXOZ or GEVO or LNZA or MCRB or CODX?

Seres Therapeutics, Inc.

(MCRB) is the more profitable company, earning 721. 9% net margin versus -75. 3% for Co-Diagnostics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 721. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EXOZ leads at 0. 0% versus -119. 1% for MCRB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CODX leads at 64. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Which pays a better dividend — EXOZ or GEVO or LNZA or MCRB or CODX?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

07

Is EXOZ or GEVO or LNZA or MCRB or CODX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, eXoZymes, Inc.

(EXOZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 92)). Seres Therapeutics, Inc. (MCRB) carries a higher beta of 1. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXOZ: +11. 2%, MCRB: -98. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

08

What are the main differences between EXOZ and GEVO and LNZA and MCRB and CODX?

These companies operate in different sectors (EXOZ (Healthcare) and GEVO (Basic Materials) and LNZA (Industrials) and MCRB (Healthcare) and CODX (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: EXOZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GEVO is a small-cap high-growth stock; LNZA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MCRB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CODX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

EXOZ

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GEVO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 23%
  • Gross Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LNZA

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MCRB

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CODX

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 38%
  • Gross Margin > 38%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.