Construction Materials
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
EXP vs AWI vs MLM vs TREX vs VMC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Construction
Construction Materials
Construction
Construction Materials
EXP vs AWI vs MLM vs TREX vs VMC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction Materials | Construction | Construction Materials | Construction | Construction Materials |
| Market Cap | $6.99B | $7.09B | $37.12B | $4.25B | $38.37B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.30B | $1.65B | $6.55B | $1.17B | $8.05B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $447M | $306M | $2.53B | $190M | $1.12B |
| Gross Margin | 29.0% | 40.3% | 29.6% | 39.2% | 27.6% |
| Operating Margin | 25.4% | 27.5% | 22.7% | 22.0% | 20.6% |
| Forward P/E | 16.8x | 20.0x | 31.5x | 24.4x | 32.2x |
| Total Debt | $1.28B | $532M | $5.32B | $229M | $5.41B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $113M | $67M | $4M | $183M |
EXP vs AWI vs MLM vs TREX vs VMC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP) | 100 | 325.1 | +225.1% |
| Armstrong World Ind… (AWI) | 100 | 220.5 | +120.5% |
| Martin Marietta Mat… (MLM) | 100 | 320.4 | +220.4% |
| Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) | 100 | 66.5 | -33.5% |
| Vulcan Materials Co… (VMC) | 100 | 273.0 | +173.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EXP vs AWI vs MLM vs TREX vs VMC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EXP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.32 vs TREX's 7.30
- Lower P/E (16.8x vs 32.2x), PEG 0.32 vs 2.46
AWI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.1%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.5%
- 308.7% 10Y total return vs MLM's 259.4%
- 12.1% revenue growth vs EXP's 0.1%
- 0.8% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs VMC's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
MLM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 53.0%, current ratio 3.57x
- 38.7% margin vs VMC's 13.9%
- +15.7% vs TREX's -31.3%
Among these 5 stocks, TREX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
VMC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.80, yield 0.7%
- Beta 0.80, yield 0.7%, current ratio 2.69x
- Beta 0.80 vs TREX's 1.47
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.1% revenue growth vs EXP's 0.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.8x vs 32.2x), PEG 0.32 vs 2.46 | |
| Quality / Margins | 38.7% margin vs VMC's 13.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs TREX's 1.47 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs VMC's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +15.7% vs TREX's -31.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.0% ROA vs VMC's 6.6%, ROIC 24.9% vs 8.8% |
EXP vs AWI vs MLM vs TREX vs VMC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
EXP vs AWI vs MLM vs TREX vs VMC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AWI leads in 2 of 6 categories
MLM leads 1 • EXP leads 1 • VMC leads 1 • TREX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MLM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VMC is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.1B annually — 6.9x TREX's $1.2B. MLM is the more profitable business, keeping 38.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VMC's 13.9%. On growth, VMC holds the edge at +7.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.3B | $1.6B | $6.6B | $1.2B | $8.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $748M | $603M | $2.1B | $321M | $2.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $447M | $306M | $2.5B | $190M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $244M | $247M | $1.0B | $147M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.0% | +40.3% | +29.6% | +39.2% | +27.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.4% | +27.5% | +22.7% | +22.0% | +20.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +18.6% | +38.7% | +16.2% | +13.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.6% | +15.0% | +15.8% | +12.5% | +13.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | +7.1% | +0.7% | -3.9% | +7.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.7% | -1.9% | +12.2% | -77.8% | +29.9% |
Valuation Metrics
EXP leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.8x trailing earnings, EXP trades at a 57% valuation discount to VMC's 36.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), EXP offers better value at 0.30x vs TREX's 6.70x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.0B | $7.1B | $37.1B | $4.2B | $38.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.2B | $7.5B | $42.4B | $4.5B | $43.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.76x | 23.48x | 32.74x | 22.42x | 36.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.81x | 20.01x | 31.51x | 24.41x | 32.17x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.30x | — | 3.19x | 6.70x | 2.78x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.88x | 17.34x | 19.63x | 13.94x | 18.71x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.09x | 4.38x | 5.67x | 3.62x | 4.84x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.01x | 8.05x | 3.71x | 4.13x | 4.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.79x | 28.83x | 37.96x | 31.59x | 33.80x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AWI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AWI delivers a 34.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $35 in annual profit, vs $13 for VMC. TREX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EXP's 0.88x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AWI scores 9/9 vs EXP's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +29.1% | +34.8% | +25.1% | +19.2% | +13.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.1% | +16.0% | +13.3% | +12.4% | +6.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.6% | +24.9% | +7.6% | +16.4% | +8.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +20.9% | +26.5% | +8.7% | +23.2% | +10.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.88x | 0.59x | 0.53x | 0.22x | 0.63x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.3B | $419M | $5.3B | $225M | $5.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $113M | $67M | $4M | $183M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $532M | $5.3B | $229M | $5.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.77x | 13.31x | 6.44x | 3394.21x | 4.13x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AWI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MLM five years ago would be worth $16,903 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,755 for TREX. Over the past 12 months, MLM leads with a +15.7% total return vs TREX's -31.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AWI at 36.4% vs TREX's -10.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.8% | -15.4% | -2.9% | +11.4% | +1.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -5.4% | +11.6% | +15.7% | -31.3% | +11.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.6% | +153.5% | +57.6% | -29.1% | +56.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +53.8% | +67.1% | +69.0% | -62.4% | +59.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +201.7% | +308.7% | +259.4% | +247.6% | +171.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.2% | +36.4% | +16.4% | -10.8% | +16.0% |
Risk & Volatility
VMC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VMC is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TREX's 1.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VMC currently trades 89.3% from its 52-week high vs TREX's 58.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.29x | 0.82x | 0.87x | 1.47x | 0.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $243.64 | $206.08 | $710.97 | $68.78 | $331.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $171.99 | $148.06 | $530.86 | $29.77 | $252.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.1% | +80.7% | +86.6% | +58.0% | +89.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.5 | 37.8 | 46.5 | 41.3 | 52.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 405K | 509K | 492K | 1.8M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AWI and VMC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EXP as "Buy", AWI as "Buy", MLM as "Buy", TREX as "Hold", VMC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 18.8% upside for AWI (target: $198) vs 3.3% for EXP (target: $224). For income investors, AWI offers the higher dividend yield at 0.76% vs EXP's 0.46%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $224.17 | $197.50 | $695.30 | $44.50 | $327.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 26 | 40 | 31 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.5% | +0.8% | +0.5% | — | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 8 | 11 | 2 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.00 | $1.27 | $3.26 | — | $1.97 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.4% | +1.8% | +1.2% | +1.3% | +1.1% |
AWI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). MLM leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
EXP vs AWI vs MLM vs TREX vs VMC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EXP or AWI or MLM or TREX or VMC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the stronger pick with 12. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 1% for Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP). Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E (16. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EXP or AWI or MLM or TREX or VMC?
On trailing P/E, Eagle Materials Inc.
(EXP) is the cheapest at 15. 8x versus Vulcan Materials Company at 36. 4x. On forward P/E, Eagle Materials Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Eagle Materials Inc. wins at 0. 32x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 30x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EXP or AWI or MLM or TREX or VMC?
Over the past 5 years, Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
(MLM) delivered a total return of +69. 0%, compared to -62. 4% for Trex Company, Inc. (TREX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AWI returned +308. 7% versus VMC's +171. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EXP or AWI or MLM or TREX or VMC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Vulcan Materials Company (VMC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
80β versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 1. 47β — meaning TREX is approximately 84% more volatile than VMC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 88% for Eagle Materials Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EXP or AWI or MLM or TREX or VMC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is pulling ahead at 12. 1% versus 0. 1% for Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vulcan Materials Company grew EPS 18. 5% year-over-year, compared to -42. 0% for Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AWI leads at 9. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EXP or AWI or MLM or TREX or VMC?
Eagle Materials Inc.
(EXP) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 5% net margin versus 13. 6% for Vulcan Materials Company — meaning it keeps 20. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AWI leads at 26. 6% versus 20. 1% for VMC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AWI leads at 40. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EXP or AWI or MLM or TREX or VMC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 32x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 30x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP) trades at 16. 8x forward P/E versus 32. 2x for Vulcan Materials Company — 15. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AWI: 18. 8% to $197. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — EXP or AWI or MLM or TREX or VMC?
In this comparison, AWI (0.
8% yield), VMC (0. 7% yield), MLM (0. 5% yield), EXP (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. TREX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is EXP or AWI or MLM or TREX or VMC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 0. 8% yield, +308. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AWI: +308. 7%, TREX: +247. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EXP and AWI and MLM and TREX and VMC?
These companies operate in different sectors (EXP (Basic Materials) and AWI (Industrials) and MLM (Basic Materials) and TREX (Industrials) and VMC (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: EXP is a small-cap deep-value stock; AWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MLM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TREX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VMC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. AWI, MLM, VMC pay a dividend while EXP, TREX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.