Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FAST vs SNA vs SWK vs ITW

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FAST
Fastenal Company

Industrial - Distribution

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$50.71B
5Y Perf.+114.1%
SNA
Snap-on Incorporated

Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$19.47B
5Y Perf.+188.4%
SWK
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.60B
5Y Perf.-35.4%
ITW
Illinois Tool Works Inc.

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$73.42B
5Y Perf.+47.7%

FAST vs SNA vs SWK vs ITW — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FAST logoFAST
SNA logoSNA
SWK logoSWK
ITW logoITW
IndustryIndustrial - DistributionManufacturing - Tools & AccessoriesManufacturing - Tools & AccessoriesIndustrial - Machinery
Market Cap$50.71B$19.47B$12.60B$73.42B
Revenue (TTM)$8.20B$5.12B$15.23B$16.22B
Net Income (TTM)$1.26B$1.02B$371M$3.13B
Gross Margin45.0%51.3%30.0%44.1%
Operating Margin20.2%24.7%7.8%26.4%
Forward P/E35.7x19.6x17.8x22.6x
Total Debt$442M$1.33B$5.86B$8.97B
Cash & Equiv.$277M$1.62B$280M$851M

FAST vs SNA vs SWK vs ITWLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FAST
SNA
SWK
ITW
StockMay 20May 26Return
Fastenal Company (FAST)100214.1+114.1%
Snap-on Incorporated (SNA)100288.4+188.4%
Stanley Black & Dec… (SWK)10064.6-35.4%
Illinois Tool Works… (ITW)100147.7+47.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FAST vs SNA vs SWK vs ITW

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FAST and SWK are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. SNA also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FAST
Fastenal Company
The Growth Play

FAST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 8.7%, EPS growth 9.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.5%
  • 336.4% 10Y total return vs ITW's 188.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 11.2%, current ratio 4.85x
  • Beta 0.65, yield 2.0%, current ratio 4.85x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
SNA
Snap-on Incorporated
The Value Pick

SNA is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 1.80 vs FAST's 4.59
  • 20.0% margin vs SWK's 2.4%
Best for: valuation efficiency
SWK
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
The Income Pick

SWK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 1.83, yield 4.1%
  • Lower P/E (17.8x vs 22.6x)
  • 4.1% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs SNA's 2.3%
  • +36.4% vs ITW's +7.4%
Best for: income & stability
ITW
Illinois Tool Works Inc.
The Income Angle

ITW lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: industrials exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFAST logoFAST8.7% revenue growth vs SWK's -1.5%
ValueSWK logoSWKLower P/E (17.8x vs 22.6x)
Quality / MarginsSNA logoSNA20.0% margin vs SWK's 2.4%
Stability / SafetyFAST logoFASTBeta 0.65 vs SWK's 1.83, lower leverage
DividendsSWK logoSWK4.1% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs SNA's 2.3%
Momentum (1Y)SWK logoSWK+36.4% vs ITW's +7.4%
Efficiency (ROA)FAST logoFAST24.9% ROA vs SWK's 1.7%, ROIC 31.2% vs 5.8%

FAST vs SNA vs SWK vs ITW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FASTFastenal Company
FY 2015
UNITED STATES
88.9%$3.4B
CANADA
5.8%$223M
Other Countries
5.3%$205M
SNASnap-on Incorporated
FY 2025
Tools Group
38.1%$2.0B
Repair Systems And Information Group
36.4%$1.9B
Commercial And Industrial Group
28.3%$1.5B
Financial Services
8.0%$413M
Product And Services, Excluding Financial Services
-10.8%$-556,300,000
SWKStanley Black & Decker, Inc.
FY 2024
Industrial Segment
100.0%$2.1B
ITWIllinois Tool Works Inc.
FY 2025
Automotive OEM Segment
20.5%$3.3B
Test and Measurement and Electronics Segment
17.6%$2.8B
Food Equipment Segment
16.8%$2.7B
Welding Segment
11.8%$1.9B
Construction Products Segment
11.3%$1.8B
Specialty Products Segment
11.1%$1.8B
Polymers and Fluids Segment
11.0%$1.8B

FAST vs SNA vs SWK vs ITW — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFASTLAGGINGITW

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SNA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

ITW is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.2B annually — 3.2x SNA's $5.1B. SNA is the more profitable business, keeping 20.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SWK's 2.4%. On growth, FAST holds the edge at +11.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFAST logoFASTFastenal CompanySNA logoSNASnap-on Incorpora…SWK logoSWKStanley Black & D…ITW logoITWIllinois Tool Wor…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$8.2B$5.1B$15.2B$16.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$1.8B$1.4B$1.7B$4.6B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1.3B$1.0B$371M$3.1B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$1.1B$1.1B$726M$2.2B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+45.0%+51.3%+30.0%+44.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+20.2%+24.7%+7.8%+26.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+15.3%+20.0%+2.4%+19.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+12.8%+21.0%+4.8%+13.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.1%-2.9%+2.7%+4.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+13.0%+4.0%-35.0%+11.8%
SNA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SWK leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 19.5x trailing earnings, SNA trades at a 52% valuation discount to FAST's 40.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SNA offers better value at 1.79x vs FAST's 5.22x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricFAST logoFASTFastenal CompanySNA logoSNASnap-on Incorpora…SWK logoSWKStanley Black & D…ITW logoITWIllinois Tool Wor…
Market CapShares × price$50.7B$19.5B$12.6B$73.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$50.9B$19.2B$18.2B$81.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS40.52x19.49x30.59x24.29x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.35.66x19.57x17.83x22.56x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate5.22x1.79x2.53x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple30.73x13.44x11.80x17.70x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue6.18x3.78x0.83x4.58x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share12.88x3.33x1.36x23.08x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF48.27x19.36x18.32x27.12x
SWK leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FAST leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

ITW delivers a 97.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $97 in annual profit, vs $4 for SWK. FAST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ITW's 2.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FAST scores 7/9 vs ITW's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFAST logoFASTFastenal CompanySNA logoSNASnap-on Incorpora…SWK logoSWKStanley Black & D…ITW logoITWIllinois Tool Wor…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+31.9%+17.4%+4.1%+97.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+24.9%+12.2%+1.7%+19.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+31.2%+18.1%+5.8%+29.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+39.7%+18.4%+7.0%+38.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–97665
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.11x0.22x0.65x2.78x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$165M-$298M$5.6B$8.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$277M$1.6B$280M$851M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$442M$1.3B$5.9B$9.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense259.39x27.12x2.07x14.53x
FAST leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FAST leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FAST five years ago would be worth $17,893 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,402 for SWK. Over the past 12 months, SWK leads with a +36.4% total return vs ITW's +7.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FAST at 19.9% vs SWK's 2.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFAST logoFASTFastenal CompanySNA logoSNASnap-on Incorpora…SWK logoSWKStanley Black & D…ITW logoITWIllinois Tool Wor…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+10.4%+7.3%+7.1%+2.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+13.7%+20.9%+36.4%+7.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+72.4%+53.2%+7.9%+19.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+78.9%+60.4%-56.0%+18.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+336.4%+168.1%-0.7%+188.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+19.9%+15.3%+2.6%+6.0%
FAST leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FAST and SNA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

FAST is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SWK's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SNA currently trades 93.3% from its 52-week high vs ITW's 84.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFAST logoFASTFastenal CompanySNA logoSNASnap-on Incorpora…SWK logoSWKStanley Black & D…ITW logoITWIllinois Tool Wor…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.65x0.76x1.83x0.68x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$50.63$400.88$93.37$303.16
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$38.97$301.82$59.54$238.82
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+87.2%+93.3%+86.8%+84.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10044.946.159.040.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded7.3M367K2.0M1.2M
Evenly matched — FAST and SNA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SWK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: FAST as "Hold", SNA as "Buy", SWK as "Hold", ITW as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 10.4% upside for SNA (target: $413) vs 5.4% for FAST (target: $47). For income investors, SWK offers the higher dividend yield at 4.06% vs FAST's 1.98%.

MetricFAST logoFASTFastenal CompanySNA logoSNASnap-on Incorpora…SWK logoSWKStanley Black & D…ITW logoITWIllinois Tool Wor…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$46.57$413.00$89.17$271.17
# AnalystsCovering analysts31173728
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.0%+2.3%+4.1%+2.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1161612
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.87$8.72$3.29$6.11
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.7%+0.1%+2.0%
SWK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

SWK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). FAST leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallFastenal Company (FAST)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FAST vs SNA vs SWK vs ITW: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FAST or SNA or SWK or ITW a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Fastenal Company (FAST) is the stronger pick with 8.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 5% for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK). Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) offers the better valuation at 19. 5x trailing P/E (19. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FAST or SNA or SWK or ITW?

On trailing P/E, Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is the cheapest at 19.

5x versus Fastenal Company at 40. 5x. On forward P/E, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Snap-on Incorporated wins at 1. 80x versus Fastenal Company's 4. 59x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FAST or SNA or SWK or ITW?

Over the past 5 years, Fastenal Company (FAST) delivered a total return of +78.

9%, compared to -56. 0% for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FAST returned +336. 4% versus SWK's -0. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FAST or SNA or SWK or ITW?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fastenal Company (FAST) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

65β versus Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. 's 1. 83β — meaning SWK is approximately 181% more volatile than FAST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fastenal Company (FAST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 3% for Illinois Tool Works Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FAST or SNA or SWK or ITW?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fastenal Company (FAST) is pulling ahead at 8.

7% versus -1. 5% for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. grew EPS 35. 9% year-over-year, compared to -10. 4% for Illinois Tool Works Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FAST leads at 5. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FAST or SNA or SWK or ITW?

Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is the more profitable company, earning 19.

7% net margin versus 2. 7% for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ITW leads at 26. 3% versus 7. 6% for SWK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SNA leads at 51. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FAST or SNA or SWK or ITW more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 80x versus Fastenal Company's 4. 59x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) trades at 17. 8x forward P/E versus 35. 7x for Fastenal Company — 17. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SNA: 10. 4% to $413. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FAST or SNA or SWK or ITW?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 2. 0% for Fastenal Company (FAST).

09

Is FAST or SNA or SWK or ITW better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Fastenal Company (FAST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

65), 2. 0% yield, +336. 4% 10Y return). Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FAST: +336. 4%, SWK: -0. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FAST and SNA and SWK and ITW?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FAST is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SNA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SWK is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; ITW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

FAST

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SNA

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 11%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SWK

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 18%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ITW

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 11%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.9%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FAST and SNA and SWK and ITW on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FAST: 11.1% · SNA: -2.9%)
Net Margin>
%
(FAST: 15.3% · SNA: 20.0%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(FAST: 40.5x · SNA: 19.5x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.