Restaurants
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FAT vs DENN vs RRGB vs ARKR vs RAVE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
Restaurants
Restaurants
Restaurants
FAT vs DENN vs RRGB vs ARKR vs RAVE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $3M | $322M | $81M | $27M | $41M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $574M | $457M | $1.21B | $162M | $13M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-226M | $10M | $-23M | $-14M | $3M |
| Gross Margin | 27.4% | 43.8% | 26.8% | 6.9% | 53.4% |
| Operating Margin | -14.1% | 8.4% | 0.2% | -0.5% | 28.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 15.0x | — | — | 15.3x |
| Total Debt | $1.47B | $408M | $514M | $86M | $576K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $23M | $2M | $20M | $11M | $3M |
FAT vs DENN vs RRGB vs ARKR vs RAVE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FAT Brands Inc. (FAT) | 100 | 8.9 | -91.1% |
| Denny's Corporation (DENN) | 100 | 57.4 | -42.6% |
| Red Robin Gourmet B… (RRGB) | 100 | 36.3 | -63.7% |
| Ark Restaurants Cor… (ARKR) | 100 | 56.6 | -43.4% |
| RAVE Restaurant Gro… (RAVE) | 100 | 327.8 | +227.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FAT vs DENN vs RRGB vs ARKR vs RAVE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FAT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.56, yield 100.0%
- Rev growth 23.4%, EPS growth -98.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 70.8%
- -14.2% 10Y total return vs RAVE's -42.0%
- 23.4% revenue growth vs ARKR's -9.7%
DENN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value and momentum.
- Better valuation composite
- +39.8% vs FAT's -94.2%
RRGB lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, ARKR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
RAVE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.60, Low D/E 4.1%, current ratio 6.61x
- Beta 0.60, current ratio 6.61x
- 23.2% margin vs FAT's -39.3%
- Beta 0.60 vs RRGB's 2.10
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.4% revenue growth vs ARKR's -9.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.2% margin vs FAT's -39.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.60 vs RRGB's 2.10 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.8% vs FAT's -94.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.8% ROA vs FAT's -18.0%, ROIC 21.6% vs -3.8% |
FAT vs DENN vs RRGB vs ARKR vs RAVE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FAT vs DENN vs RRGB vs ARKR vs RAVE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RAVE leads in 4 of 6 categories
FAT leads 0 • DENN leads 0 • RRGB leads 0 • ARKR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RAVE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RRGB is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 95.8x RAVE's $13M. RAVE is the more profitable business, keeping 23.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FAT's -39.3%. On growth, RAVE holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $574M | $457M | $1.2B | $162M | $13M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$44M | $55M | $54M | $2M | $4M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$226M | $10M | -$23M | -$14M | $3M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$75M | $2M | $6M | -$1M | $3M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.4% | +43.8% | +26.8% | +6.9% | +53.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -14.1% | +8.4% | +0.2% | -0.5% | +28.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -39.3% | +2.2% | -1.9% | -8.5% | +23.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -13.1% | +0.5% | +0.5% | -0.9% | +25.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.3% | +1.3% | -5.7% | -9.4% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -23.7% | -89.9% | +77.4% | -71.6% | +20.7% |
Valuation Metrics
RAVE leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.2x trailing earnings, DENN trades at a 0% valuation discount to RAVE's 15.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RAVE's 10.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DENN's 12.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $322M | $81M | $27M | $41M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $728M | $575M | $101M | $39M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | 15.24x | -2.80x | -2.33x | 15.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.02x | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.10x | 10.66x | — | 10.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 0.71x | 0.07x | 0.16x | 3.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | — | 0.83x | 2.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 350.62x | 13.00x | — | 12.39x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RAVE leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RAVE delivers a 19.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-42 for ARKR. RAVE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARKR's 2.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RAVE scores 8/9 vs FAT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | — | — | -41.5% | +19.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -18.0% | +2.0% | -4.1% | -10.5% | +16.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.8% | +9.7% | +0.5% | -2.6% | +21.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.0% | +11.9% | +0.7% | -3.4% | +22.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | — | 2.67x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.5B | $406M | $494M | $74M | -$2M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $23M | $2M | $20M | $11M | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $408M | $514M | $86M | $576,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.54x | 1.73x | 0.26x | -21.75x | 9.23x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RAVE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RAVE five years ago would be worth $22,045 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,032 for RRGB. Over the past 12 months, DENN leads with a +39.8% total return vs FAT's -94.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RAVE at 24.7% vs RRGB's -33.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -52.3% | +0.6% | -11.4% | +12.0% | -8.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -94.2% | +39.8% | +34.9% | -37.3% | +16.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.9% | -41.3% | -70.5% | -52.4% | +94.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.5% | -64.9% | -89.7% | -55.9% | +120.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.2% | -42.9% | -94.4% | -36.1% | -42.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.8% | -16.3% | -33.4% | -21.9% | +24.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DENN and ARKR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ARKR is the less volatile stock with a -0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RRGB's 2.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DENN currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs FAT's 4.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.56x | 0.65x | 2.10x | -0.42x | 0.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.45 | $6.26 | $7.89 | $12.60 | $3.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.06 | $3.36 | $2.46 | $5.98 | $2.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +4.7% | +99.8% | +46.5% | +58.7% | +77.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 32.2 | 66.9 | 51.6 | 53.4 | 51.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 85K | 0 | 384K | 5K | 55K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DENN as "Buy", RRGB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 90.7% upside for RRGB (target: $7) vs -4.0% for DENN (target: $6). FAT is the only dividend payer here at 100.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $6.00 | $7.00 | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 21 | 38 | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.56 | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.9% |
RAVE leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
FAT vs DENN vs RRGB vs ARKR vs RAVE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FAT or DENN or RRGB or ARKR or RAVE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, FAT Brands Inc.
(FAT) is the stronger pick with 23. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 7% for Ark Restaurants Corp. (ARKR). Denny's Corporation (DENN) offers the better valuation at 15. 2x trailing P/E (15. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Denny's Corporation (DENN) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FAT or DENN or RRGB or ARKR or RAVE?
On trailing P/E, Denny's Corporation (DENN) is the cheapest at 15.
2x versus RAVE Restaurant Group, Inc. at 15. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FAT or DENN or RRGB or ARKR or RAVE?
Over the past 5 years, RAVE Restaurant Group, Inc.
(RAVE) delivered a total return of +120. 5%, compared to -89. 7% for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. (RRGB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FAT returned -14. 2% versus RRGB's -94. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FAT or DENN or RRGB or ARKR or RAVE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ark Restaurants Corp.
(ARKR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 42β versus Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. 's 2. 10β — meaning RRGB is approximately -599% more volatile than ARKR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RAVE Restaurant Group, Inc. (RAVE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 3% for Ark Restaurants Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FAT or DENN or RRGB or ARKR or RAVE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), FAT Brands Inc.
(FAT) is pulling ahead at 23. 4% versus -9. 7% for Ark Restaurants Corp. (ARKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. grew EPS 73. 4% year-over-year, compared to -194. 4% for Ark Restaurants Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FAT leads at 70. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FAT or DENN or RRGB or ARKR or RAVE?
RAVE Restaurant Group, Inc.
(RAVE) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 4% net margin versus -32. 0% for FAT Brands Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RAVE leads at 27. 1% versus -8. 8% for FAT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DENN leads at 73. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FAT or DENN or RRGB or ARKR or RAVE more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RRGB: 90.
7% to $7. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FAT or DENN or RRGB or ARKR or RAVE?
In this comparison, FAT (100.
0% yield) pays a dividend. DENN, RRGB, ARKR, RAVE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FAT or DENN or RRGB or ARKR or RAVE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ark Restaurants Corp.
(ARKR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 42)). Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. (RRGB) carries a higher beta of 2. 10 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARKR: -36. 1%, RRGB: -94. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FAT and DENN and RRGB and ARKR and RAVE?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FAT is a small-cap high-growth stock; DENN is a small-cap deep-value stock; RRGB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARKR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RAVE is a small-cap deep-value stock. FAT pays a dividend while DENN, RRGB, ARKR, RAVE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.