Software - Infrastructure
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
FATN vs CMBM vs CALX vs CSCO vs ANET vs KO vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
Software - Application
Communication Equipment
Computer Hardware
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Banks - Diversified
FATN vs CMBM vs CALX vs CSCO vs ANET vs KO vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Communication Equipment | Software - Application | Communication Equipment | Computer Hardware | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $85M | $4M | $2.41B | $489.33B | $196.93B | $342.35B | $869.15B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $19M | $172M | $1.06B | $60.75B | $9.71B | $49.28B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $-98M | $34M | $11.96B | $3.72B | $13.70B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 87.2% | 17.1% | 57.1% | 64.3% | 63.5% | 61.7% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 18.7% | -48.1% | 3.8% | 23.4% | 42.8% | 29.3% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 20.8x | — | 21.0x | 29.0x | 43.1x | 24.3x | 14.0x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $32M | $26M | $28.09B | $0.00 | $45.49B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $19M | $143M | $8.35B | $1.96B | $10.27B | $343.34B |
FATN vs CMBM vs CALX vs CSCO vs ANET vs KO vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 25 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FatPipe, Inc. Commo… (FATN) | 100 | Infinity | +Infinity% |
| Cambium Networks Co… (CMBM) | 100 | 158.8 | +58.8% |
| Calix, Inc. (CALX) | 100 | 105.2 | +5.2% |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) | 100 | 201.2 | +101.2% |
| Arista Networks, In… (ANET) | 100 | 201.9 | +101.9% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 111.1 | +11.1% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 126.8 | +26.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FATN vs CMBM vs CALX vs CSCO vs ANET vs KO vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 7 stocks, FATN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CMBM doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
CALX is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 3.0%, current ratio 4.24x
CSCO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +90.9% vs CMBM's -64.6%
ANET carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 28.6%, EPS growth 23.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.1%
- 32.4% 10Y total return vs JPM's 433.9%
- PEG 1.06 vs KO's 2.18
- 28.6% revenue growth vs CMBM's -25.8%
- 38.3% margin vs CMBM's -57.0%
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 2.6% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (4 stocks pay no dividend)
JPM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.95, yield 1.9%
- Beta 0.95, yield 1.9%, current ratio 0.52x
- Lower P/E (14.0x vs 24.3x), PEG 1.07 vs 2.18
- Beta 0.95 vs FATN's 2.17
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.6% revenue growth vs CMBM's -25.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.0x vs 24.3x), PEG 1.07 vs 2.18 | |
| Quality / Margins | 38.3% margin vs CMBM's -57.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.95 vs FATN's 2.17 | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (4 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +90.9% vs CMBM's -64.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.7% ROA vs CMBM's -44.1%, ROIC 32.8% vs -41.3% |
FATN vs CMBM vs CALX vs CSCO vs ANET vs KO vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FATN vs CMBM vs CALX vs CSCO vs ANET vs KO vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 7 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ANET leads in 3 of 6 categories
KO leads 2 • JPM leads 1 • FATN leads 0 • CMBM leads 0 • CALX leads 0 • CSCO leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ANET leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 14594.4x FATN's $19M. ANET is the more profitable business, keeping 38.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CMBM's -57.0%. On growth, FATN holds the edge at +129.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $19M | $172M | $1.1B | $60.7B | $9.7B | $49.3B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | -$74M | $57M | $16.5B | $4.2B | $15.5B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | -$98M | $34M | $12.0B | $3.7B | $13.7B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$788,908 | -$24M | $109M | $12.6B | $5.3B | $12.6B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +87.2% | +17.1% | +57.1% | +64.3% | +63.5% | +61.7% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.7% | -48.1% | +3.8% | +23.4% | +42.8% | +29.3% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.9% | -57.0% | +3.2% | +19.7% | +38.3% | +27.8% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | -13.9% | +10.3% | +20.8% | +54.4% | +25.5% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +129.5% | +1.6% | +27.1% | +12.0% | +35.1% | +12.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +64.2% | +3.3% | +37.1% | +25.0% | +18.2% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.5x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 89% valuation discount to CALX's 143.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 1.19x vs KO's 2.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $85M | $4M | $2.4B | $489.3B | $196.9B | $342.4B | $869.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $86M | $17M | $2.3B | $509.1B | $195.0B | $377.6B | $1.47T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.40x | -0.05x | 143.38x | 48.69x | 56.87x | 26.16x | 15.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.76x | — | 20.98x | 29.04x | 43.09x | 24.33x | 13.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.40x | 2.34x | 1.19x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.70x | — | 59.20x | 34.82x | 49.63x | 25.49x | 18.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.45x | 0.02x | 2.41x | 8.64x | 21.87x | 7.14x | 3.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.38x | 0.04x | 3.06x | 10.60x | 16.13x | 10.01x | 2.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 20.85x | 36.82x | 46.31x | 64.64x | 8.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ANET leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-2 for CMBM. CALX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CSCO scores 8/9 vs CMBM's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +22.7% | -2.2% | +4.2% | +25.1% | +30.6% | +41.1% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +15.2% | -44.1% | +3.5% | +9.7% | +19.7% | +13.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.9% | -41.3% | +2.1% | +13.0% | +32.8% | +15.8% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.8% | -40.1% | +2.5% | +13.7% | +30.4% | +17.3% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 0.39x | 0.03x | 0.60x | — | 1.33x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $493,351 | $13M | -$118M | $19.7B | -$2.0B | $35.2B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $19M | $143M | $8.3B | $2.0B | $10.3B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $32M | $26M | $28.1B | $0 | $45.5B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.75x | -19.20x | — | 10.61x | — | 10.70x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ANET leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ANET five years ago would be worth $70,546 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $27 for CMBM. Over the past 12 months, CSCO leads with a +90.9% total return vs CMBM's -64.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ANET at 56.8% vs CMBM's -80.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +183.3% | -91.3% | -30.4% | +64.4% | +17.1% | +15.8% | -3.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -24.3% | -64.6% | -22.7% | +90.9% | +61.6% | +13.7% | +18.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -99.2% | -27.2% | +159.6% | +285.4% | +41.5% | +131.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -99.7% | -20.1% | +143.9% | +605.5% | +59.8% | +102.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -98.7% | +434.1% | +375.2% | +3241.9% | +112.2% | +433.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | -80.4% | -10.0% | +37.4% | +56.8% | +12.3% | +32.4% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FATN's 2.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs CMBM's 1.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.17x | 1.84x | 1.00x | 1.04x | 2.09x | -0.15x | 0.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.90 | $6.80 | $71.22 | $130.37 | $179.80 | $82.66 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.31 | $0.13 | $36.83 | $63.87 | $85.58 | $65.35 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +55.9% | +1.9% | +52.3% | +95.2% | +87.0% | +96.2% | +92.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.4 | 28.8 | 31.1 | 63.0 | 48.3 | 51.4 | 59.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 779K | 935K | 21.7M | 8.8M | 12.5M | 7.1M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FATN as "Buy", CALX as "Buy", CSCO as "Buy", ANET as "Buy", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.6% upside for CALX (target: $61) vs -1.5% for CSCO (target: $122). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.56% vs CSCO's 1.30%.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $61.00 | $122.30 | $183.30 | $86.29 | $338.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | — | 21 | 73 | 52 | 48 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.3% | — | +2.6% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 15 | — | 56 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.61 | — | $2.04 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +19.1% | +3.9% | +1.5% | +0.8% | +0.2% | +4.0% |
ANET leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KO leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook).
FATN vs CMBM vs CALX vs CSCO vs ANET vs KO vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FATN or CMBM or CALX or CSCO or ANET or KO or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arista Networks, Inc.
(ANET) is the stronger pick with 28. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -25. 8% for Cambium Networks Corporation (CMBM). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (14. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock (FATN) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FATN or CMBM or CALX or CSCO or ANET or KO or JPM?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 15. 5x versus Calix, Inc. at 143. 4x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Arista Networks, Inc. wins at 1. 06x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 18x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FATN or CMBM or CALX or CSCO or ANET or KO or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, Arista Networks, Inc.
(ANET) delivered a total return of +605. 5%, compared to -99. 7% for Cambium Networks Corporation (CMBM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ANET returned +32. 4% versus CMBM's -98. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FATN or CMBM or CALX or CSCO or ANET or KO or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
15β versus FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock's 2. 17β — meaning FATN is approximately -1568% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Calix, Inc. (CALX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FATN or CMBM or CALX or CSCO or ANET or KO or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arista Networks, Inc.
(ANET) is pulling ahead at 28. 6% versus -25. 8% for Cambium Networks Corporation (CMBM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Calix, Inc. grew EPS 157. 8% year-over-year, compared to -490. 3% for Cambium Networks Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, ANET leads at 27. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FATN or CMBM or CALX or CSCO or ANET or KO or JPM?
Arista Networks, Inc.
(ANET) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 0% net margin versus -35. 2% for Cambium Networks Corporation — meaning it keeps 39. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ANET leads at 42. 8% versus -27. 6% for CMBM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FATN leads at 76. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FATN or CMBM or CALX or CSCO or ANET or KO or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 06x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 18x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 0x forward P/E versus 43. 1x for Arista Networks, Inc. — 29. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CALX: 63. 6% to $61. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FATN or CMBM or CALX or CSCO or ANET or KO or JPM?
In this comparison, KO (2.
6% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), CSCO (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. FATN, CMBM, CALX, ANET do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FATN or CMBM or CALX or CSCO or ANET or KO or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
15), 2. 6% yield, +112. 2% 10Y return). FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock (FATN) carries a higher beta of 2. 17 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FATN and CMBM and CALX and CSCO and ANET and KO and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (FATN (Technology) and CMBM (Technology) and CALX (Technology) and CSCO (Technology) and ANET (Technology) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FATN is a small-cap high-growth stock; CMBM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CALX is a small-cap high-growth stock; CSCO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; ANET is a mid-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. CSCO, KO, JPM pay a dividend while FATN, CMBM, CALX, ANET do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.