FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
Construction
Market Cap$4.68B
5Y Perf.-25.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
FBIN vs ALLE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
ALLE
Allegion plc
Security & Protection Services
Market Cap$11.76B
5Y Perf.+37.2%
FBIN vs ALLE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | FBIN | ALLE |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction | Security & Protection Services |
| Market Cap | $4.68B | $11.76B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.36B | $4.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $195M | $634M |
| Gross Margin | 45.6% | 45.0% |
| Operating Margin | 10.6% | 20.6% |
| Forward P/E | 11.5x | 15.6x |
| Total Debt | $2.54B | $2.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $264M | $356M |
FBIN vs ALLE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
FBIN
ALLE
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fortune Brands Inno… (FBIN) | 100 | 75.0 | -25.0% |
| Allegion plc (ALLE) | 100 | 137.2 | +37.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FBIN vs ALLE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: ALLE leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
The Value Play
FBIN is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (11.5x vs 15.6x)
- 2.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs ALLE's 1.5%
Best for: value and dividends
ALLE
Allegion plc
The Income Pick
ALLE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.67, yield 1.5%
- Rev growth 7.8%, EPS growth 9.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.5%
- 127.3% 10Y total return vs FBIN's -2.4%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ALLE | 7.8% revenue growth vs FBIN's -3.2% |
| Value | FBIN | Lower P/E (11.5x vs 15.6x) |
| Quality / Margins | ALLE | 15.2% margin vs FBIN's 5.8% |
| Stability / Safety | ALLE | Beta 0.67 vs FBIN's 1.61 |
| Dividends | FBIN | 2.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs ALLE's 1.5% |
| Momentum (1Y) | ALLE | -1.0% vs FBIN's -16.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ALLE | 12.3% ROA vs FBIN's 3.0%, ROIC 18.1% vs 8.1% |
FBIN vs ALLE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FBIN vs ALLE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLALLELAGGINGFBIN
FBINFortune Brands Innova…
1leads
ALLEAllegion plc
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FBINMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
ALLE5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
FBIN6/7
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
ALLE7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
ALLE6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
ALLE2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALLE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALLE and FBIN operate at a comparable scale, with $4.2B and $3.4B in trailing revenue. ALLE is the more profitable business, keeping 15.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FBIN's 5.8%. On growth, ALLE holds the edge at +9.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FBINFortune Brands In… | ALLEAllegion plc |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.4B | $4.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $482M | $959M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $195M | $634M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $420M | $704M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.6% | +45.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.6% | +20.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | +15.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.5% | +16.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -106.4% | +9.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.0% | -7.0% |
ALLE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
FBIN leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.8x trailing earnings, FBIN trades at a 14% valuation discount to ALLE's 18.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ALLE offers better value at 1.08x vs FBIN's 2.77x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | FBINFortune Brands In… | ALLEAllegion plc |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.7B | $11.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.0B | $13.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.82x | 18.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.50x | 15.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.77x | 1.08x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.08x | 13.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.05x | 2.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.98x | 5.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.77x | 17.14x |
FBIN leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALLE leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALLE delivers a 32.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $8 for FBIN. FBIN carries lower financial leverage with a 1.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALLE's 1.10x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FBIN scores 7/9 vs ALLE's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | FBINFortune Brands In… | ALLEAllegion plc |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.3% | +32.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.0% | +12.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.1% | +18.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.9% | +20.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.07x | 1.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.3B | $1.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $264M | $356M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.5B | $2.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.72x | 8.61x |
ALLE leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ALLE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALLE five years ago would be worth $10,324 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,599 for FBIN. Over the past 12 months, ALLE leads with a -1.0% total return vs FBIN's -16.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALLE at 9.9% vs FBIN's -13.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FBINFortune Brands In… | ALLEAllegion plc |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -22.8% | -14.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -16.8% | -1.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.3% | +32.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.0% | +3.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.4% | +127.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.9% | +9.9% |
ALLE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALLE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALLE is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FBIN's 1.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALLE currently trades 74.7% from its 52-week high vs FBIN's 60.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FBINFortune Brands In… | ALLEAllegion plc |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.61x | 0.67x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $64.84 | $183.11 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $36.07 | $131.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.3% | +74.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.8 | 38.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.6M | 887K |
ALLE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FBIN and ALLE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FBIN as "Hold" and ALLE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 53.1% upside for FBIN (target: $60) vs 26.1% for ALLE (target: $173). For income investors, FBIN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.55% vs ALLE's 1.48%.
| Metric | FBINFortune Brands In… | ALLEAllegion plc |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $59.83 | $172.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 27 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.5% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.00 | $2.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.3% | +0.7% |
Evenly matched — FBIN and ALLE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
ALLE leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FBIN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallAllegion plc (ALLE)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
FBIN vs ALLE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FBIN or ALLE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Allegion plc (ALLE) is the stronger pick with 7.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN). Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) a "Hold" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FBIN or ALLE?
On trailing P/E, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
(FBIN) is the cheapest at 15. 8x versus Allegion plc at 18. 4x. On forward P/E, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Allegion plc wins at 0. 92x versus Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. 's 2. 77x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FBIN or ALLE?
Over the past 5 years, Allegion plc (ALLE) delivered a total return of +3.
2%, compared to -54. 0% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALLE returned +127. 3% versus FBIN's -2. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FBIN or ALLE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Allegion plc (ALLE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
67β versus Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. 's 1. 61β — meaning FBIN is approximately 141% more volatile than ALLE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 107% versus 110% for Allegion plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FBIN or ALLE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Allegion plc (ALLE) is pulling ahead at 7.
8% versus -3. 2% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Allegion plc grew EPS 9. 1% year-over-year, compared to -34. 1% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALLE leads at 7. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FBIN or ALLE?
Allegion plc (ALLE) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
8% net margin versus 6. 7% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALLE leads at 21. 1% versus 11. 6% for FBIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALLE leads at 45. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FBIN or ALLE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Allegion plc (ALLE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 92x versus Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. 's 2. 77x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) trades at 11. 5x forward P/E versus 15. 6x for Allegion plc — 4. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FBIN: 53. 1% to $59. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — FBIN or ALLE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) offers the highest yield at 2. 5%, versus 1. 5% for Allegion plc (ALLE).
09Is FBIN or ALLE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Allegion plc (ALLE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
67), 1. 5% yield, +127. 3% 10Y return). Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) carries a higher beta of 1. 61 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALLE: +127. 3%, FBIN: -2. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FBIN and ALLE?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FBIN is a small-cap deep-value stock; ALLE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(FBIN: -106.4% · ALLE: 9.7%)Net Margin>
%
(FBIN: 5.8% · ALLE: 15.2%)P/E Ratio<
x
(FBIN: 15.8x · ALLE: 18.4x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.