FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
Construction
Market Cap$4.80B
5Y Perf.-23.4%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
FBIN vs MAS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
MAS
Masco Corporation
Construction
Market Cap$14.51B
5Y Perf.+54.2%
FBIN vs MAS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | FBIN | MAS |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction | Construction |
| Market Cap | $4.80B | $14.51B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.49B | $7.68B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $328M | $837M |
| Gross Margin | 45.1% | 35.4% |
| Operating Margin | 12.8% | 16.8% |
| Forward P/E | 11.8x | 16.9x |
| Total Debt | $2.83B | $3.44B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $381M | $647M |
FBIN vs MAS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
FBIN
MAS
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fortune Brands Inno… (FBIN) | 100 | 76.6 | -23.4% |
| Masco Corporation (MAS) | 100 | 154.2 | +54.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FBIN vs MAS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: MAS leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
The Growth Play
FBIN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth -0.4%, EPS growth 18.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.4%
- PEG 2.83 vs MAS's 3.40
- -0.4% revenue growth vs MAS's -3.4%
Best for: growth exposure and valuation efficiency
MAS
Masco Corporation
The Income Pick
MAS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.28, yield 1.7%
- 152.3% 10Y total return vs FBIN's 0.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.28, current ratio 1.81x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FBIN | -0.4% revenue growth vs MAS's -3.4% |
| Value | FBIN | Lower P/E (11.8x vs 16.9x), PEG 2.83 vs 3.40 |
| Quality / Margins | MAS | 10.9% margin vs FBIN's 7.3% |
| Stability / Safety | MAS | Beta 1.28 vs FBIN's 1.61 |
| Dividends | FBIN | 2.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs MAS's 1.7% |
| Momentum (1Y) | MAS | +20.9% vs FBIN's -22.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MAS | 15.9% ROA vs FBIN's 5.0%, ROIC 35.4% vs 11.5% |
FBIN vs MAS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2025
FBIN vs MAS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLMASLAGGINGFBIN
FBINFortune Brands Innova…
1leads
MASMasco Corporation
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FBINMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
MAS5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
FBIN7/7
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
MAS5/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
MAS6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
MAS2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAS is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.7B annually — 1.7x FBIN's $4.5B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 10.9% (MAS) to 7.3% (FBIN). On growth, MAS holds the edge at +6.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FBINFortune Brands In… | MASMasco Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.5B | $7.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $771M | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $328M | $837M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $455M | $943M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.1% | +35.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.8% | +16.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.3% | +10.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.1% | +12.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.5% | +6.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -45.9% | +20.7% |
MAS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
FBIN leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.6x trailing earnings, FBIN trades at a 43% valuation discount to MAS's 18.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FBIN offers better value at 2.57x vs MAS's 3.76x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | FBINFortune Brands In… | MASMasco Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.8B | $14.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.2B | $17.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.65x | 18.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.75x | 16.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.57x | 3.76x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.78x | 12.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.04x | 1.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.07x | 201.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.11x | 16.76x |
FBIN leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MAS leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MAS delivers a 8.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $14 for FBIN. FBIN carries lower financial leverage with a 1.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAS's 45.81x.
| Metric | FBINFortune Brands In… | MASMasco Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.8% | +8.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.0% | +15.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.5% | +35.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.3% | +35.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.17x | 45.81x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.4B | $2.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $381M | $647M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.8B | $3.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.58x | 12.60x |
MAS leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MAS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MAS five years ago would be worth $11,754 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,770 for FBIN. Over the past 12 months, MAS leads with a +20.9% total return vs FBIN's -22.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MAS at 11.9% vs FBIN's -13.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FBINFortune Brands In… | MASMasco Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -21.1% | +12.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -22.5% | +20.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.0% | +40.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.3% | +17.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.5% | +152.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.4% | +11.9% |
MAS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MAS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MAS is the less volatile stock with a 1.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FBIN's 1.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MAS currently trades 90.9% from its 52-week high vs FBIN's 61.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FBINFortune Brands In… | MASMasco Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.61x | 1.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $64.84 | $79.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $36.07 | $58.16 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.6% | +90.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.8 | 56.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.6M | 2.7M |
MAS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FBIN and MAS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FBIN as "Hold" and MAS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.8% upside for FBIN (target: $60) vs 14.5% for MAS (target: $82). For income investors, FBIN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.38% vs MAS's 1.73%.
| Metric | FBINFortune Brands In… | MASMasco Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $59.83 | $82.36 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 27 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.4% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.95 | $1.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.0% | +3.9% |
Evenly matched — FBIN and MAS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
MAS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FBIN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallMasco Corporation (MAS)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
FBIN vs MAS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FBIN or MAS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
(FBIN) is the stronger pick with -0. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 4% for Masco Corporation (MAS). Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) offers the better valuation at 10. 6x trailing P/E (11. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Masco Corporation (MAS) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FBIN or MAS?
On trailing P/E, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
(FBIN) is the cheapest at 10. 6x versus Masco Corporation at 18. 6x. On forward P/E, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. wins at 2. 83x versus Masco Corporation's 3. 40x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FBIN or MAS?
Over the past 5 years, Masco Corporation (MAS) delivered a total return of +17.
5%, compared to -52. 3% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MAS returned +152. 3% versus FBIN's +0. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FBIN or MAS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Masco Corporation (MAS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
28β versus Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. 's 1. 61β — meaning FBIN is approximately 25% more volatile than MAS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 117% versus 46% for Masco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FBIN or MAS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
(FBIN) is pulling ahead at -0. 4% versus -3. 4% for Masco Corporation (MAS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. grew EPS 18. 3% year-over-year, compared to 2. 7% for Masco Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FBIN leads at -1. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FBIN or MAS?
Masco Corporation (MAS) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
7% net margin versus 10. 2% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MAS leads at 16. 8% versus 16. 0% for FBIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FBIN leads at 44. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FBIN or MAS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 83x versus Masco Corporation's 3. 40x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) trades at 11. 8x forward P/E versus 16. 9x for Masco Corporation — 5. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FBIN: 49. 8% to $59. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — FBIN or MAS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) offers the highest yield at 2. 4%, versus 1. 7% for Masco Corporation (MAS).
09Is FBIN or MAS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Masco Corporation (MAS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
28), 1. 7% yield, +152. 3% 10Y return). Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) carries a higher beta of 1. 61 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MAS: +152. 3%, FBIN: +0. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FBIN and MAS?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FBIN is a small-cap deep-value stock; MAS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(FBIN: -0.5% · MAS: 6.5%)Net Margin>
%
(FBIN: 7.3% · MAS: 10.9%)P/E Ratio<
x
(FBIN: 10.6x · MAS: 18.6x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.