FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
Construction
Market Cap$4.68B
5Y Perf.-25.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
FBIN vs JELD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
JELD
JELD-WEN Holding, Inc.
Construction
Market Cap$146M
5Y Perf.-87.6%
FBIN vs JELD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | FBIN | JELD |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction | Construction |
| Market Cap | $4.68B | $146M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.36B | $3.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $195M | $-508M |
| Gross Margin | 45.6% | 15.7% |
| Operating Margin | 10.6% | -8.6% |
| Forward P/E | 11.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $2.54B | $1.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $264M | $136M |
FBIN vs JELD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
FBIN
JELD
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fortune Brands Inno… (FBIN) | 100 | 75.0 | -25.0% |
| JELD-WEN Holding, I… (JELD) | 100 | 12.4 | -87.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FBIN vs JELD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: FBIN leads in 6 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
The Income Pick
FBIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.61, yield 2.5%
- Rev growth -3.2%, EPS growth -34.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.9%
- -2.4% 10Y total return vs JELD's -93.5%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
JELD
JELD-WEN Holding, Inc.
The Specific-Use Pick
In this particular matchup, JELD is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
Best for: industrials exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FBIN | -3.2% revenue growth vs JELD's -14.9% |
| Quality / Margins | FBIN | 5.8% margin vs JELD's -16.1% |
| Stability / Safety | FBIN | Beta 1.61 vs JELD's 2.74, lower leverage |
| Dividends | FBIN | 2.5% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | FBIN | -16.8% vs JELD's -58.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FBIN | 3.0% ROA vs JELD's -22.8%, ROIC 8.1% vs -1.9% |
FBIN vs JELD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
Segment breakdown not available.
FBIN vs JELD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLFBINLAGGINGJELD
JELDJELD-WEN Holding, Inc.
1leads
FBINFortune Brands Innova…
5leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs JELDMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
FBIN4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
JELD3/4
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
FBIN7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
FBIN6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
FBIN2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
FBIN1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FBIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FBIN and JELD operate at a comparable scale, with $3.4B and $3.2B in trailing revenue. FBIN is the more profitable business, keeping 5.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JELD's -16.1%. On growth, JELD holds the edge at -6.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FBINFortune Brands In… | JELDJELD-WEN Holding,… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.4B | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $482M | -$158M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $195M | -$508M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $420M | -$126M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.6% | +15.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.6% | -8.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | -16.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.5% | -4.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -106.4% | -6.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.0% | +59.8% |
FBIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
JELD leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, FBIN's 10.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JELD's 20.8x.
| Metric | FBINFortune Brands In… | JELDJELD-WEN Holding,… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.7B | $146M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.0B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.82x | -0.23x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.50x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.77x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.08x | 20.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.05x | 0.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.98x | 1.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.77x | — |
JELD leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FBIN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FBIN delivers a 8.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-3 for JELD. FBIN carries lower financial leverage with a 1.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JELD's 15.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FBIN scores 7/9 vs JELD's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | FBINFortune Brands In… | JELDJELD-WEN Holding,… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.3% | -2.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.0% | -22.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.1% | -1.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.9% | -2.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.07x | 15.81x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.3B | $1.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $264M | $136M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.5B | $1.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.72x | -4.11x |
FBIN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FBIN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FBIN five years ago would be worth $4,599 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $547 for JELD. Over the past 12 months, FBIN leads with a -16.8% total return vs JELD's -58.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FBIN at -13.9% vs JELD's -48.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FBINFortune Brands In… | JELDJELD-WEN Holding,… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -22.8% | -31.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -16.8% | -58.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.3% | -86.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.0% | -94.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.4% | -93.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.9% | -48.8% |
FBIN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FBIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FBIN is the less volatile stock with a 1.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JELD's 2.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FBIN currently trades 60.3% from its 52-week high vs JELD's 24.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FBINFortune Brands In… | JELDJELD-WEN Holding,… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.61x | 2.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $64.84 | $6.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $36.07 | $0.93 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.3% | +24.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.8 | 64.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.6M | 2.0M |
FBIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
FBIN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FBIN as "Hold" and JELD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 64.5% upside for JELD (target: $3) vs 53.1% for FBIN (target: $60). FBIN is the only dividend payer here at 2.55% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | FBINFortune Brands In… | JELDJELD-WEN Holding,… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $59.83 | $2.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 27 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.00 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.3% | 0.0% |
FBIN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
FBIN leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JELD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Best OverallFortune Brands Innovations,… (FBIN)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
FBIN vs JELD: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FBIN or JELD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
(FBIN) is the stronger pick with -3. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 9% for JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. (JELD). Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) a "Hold" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FBIN or JELD?
Over the past 5 years, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
(FBIN) delivered a total return of -54. 0%, compared to -94. 5% for JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. (JELD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FBIN returned -2. 4% versus JELD's -93. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FBIN or JELD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
(FBIN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 61β versus JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. 's 2. 74β — meaning JELD is approximately 71% more volatile than FBIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 107% versus 16% for JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — FBIN or JELD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
(FBIN) is pulling ahead at -3. 2% versus -14. 9% for JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. (JELD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. grew EPS -34. 1% year-over-year, compared to -226. 6% for JELD-WEN Holding, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FBIN leads at -1. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FBIN or JELD?
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
(FBIN) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 7% net margin versus -19. 3% for JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FBIN leads at 11. 6% versus -1. 3% for JELD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FBIN leads at 44. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is FBIN or JELD more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JELD: 64.
5% to $2. 78.
07Which pays a better dividend — FBIN or JELD?
In this comparison, FBIN (2.
5% yield) pays a dividend. JELD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is FBIN or JELD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
(FBIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2. 5% yield). JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. (JELD) carries a higher beta of 2. 74 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FBIN: -2. 4%, JELD: -93. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FBIN and JELD?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FBIN is a small-cap deep-value stock; JELD is a small-cap quality compounder stock. FBIN pays a dividend while JELD does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(FBIN: -106.4% · JELD: -6.9%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.